Cross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulations

References

• MZ Bookman, KR Bookman. Medical Tourism in Developing Countries. 2007; Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. Medical tourism: consumers in search of value. 2008; Deloitte Center for Health Solutions: Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• RD Smith, C Blouin, N Draeger. Trade in health services and the GATS: introduction and summary. C Blouin, N Draeger, D Smith. International Trade in Health Services and the GATS: Current Issues and Debates. 2006; World Bank: Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• BM Knoppers, S LeBris. Recent advances in medically assisted conception: legal, ethical and social issues. American Journal of Law and Medicine. 17: 1991; 329–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F Shenfield, J de Mouzon, G Pennings. Cross-border reproductive care in six European countries. Human Reproduction. 25(6): 2010; 1361–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Inhorn, D Birenbaum-Carmeli. Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annual Review of Anthropology. 37: 2008; 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G Pennings. Reply to: Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Human Reproduction. 20(12): 2005; 3571–3572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Whittaker, A Speier. ‘Cycling overseas’: critical perspectives on cross-border travel for medically assisted reproductive technologies. Medical Anthropology. 29(4): 2010; 363–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Petchesky. Globalisation, health sector reform, gender and reproductive health: the economic justice implications. Globalization, Health Sector Reform, Gender and Reproductive Health. 2003; Ford Foundation: New York. At: <http://www.fordfoundation.org/pdfs/library/globalization_health.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• K Nygren, D Adamson, F Zegers-Hochschild. Cross-border Fertility Care International Committee, Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies Global Survey: 2006 data and estimates. Fertility and Sterility. 94(1): 2010; e4–e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EG Hughes, D Dejean. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers. Fertility and Sterility. 1(June): 2010; e16–e19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Whittaker. Pleasure and pain: medical tourism in Asia. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice. 3(3): 2008; 271–290.
   Google Scholar
• R Robles. Womb for hire. Newsbreak. 15 June 2009 At: <www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=4726. >. Accessed 28 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Thai College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Assisted reproductive technologies, 2008. At: <www.rtcog.or.th/html/articles_details.php?id+4. >. Accessed 30 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• C Kanchanachitra, M Lindelow, T Johnston. Human resources for health in southeast Asia: shortages, distributional challenges, and international trade in health services. Lancet. 377(9767): 2011; 769–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Council of Medical Research. National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision and Regulation of ART Clinics in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, National Academy of Medical Sciences. Chapter 3: Code of Practice, Ethical Considerations and Legal Issues. 2005. At: <www.icmr.nic.in/art/Chapter_3.pdf. >. Accessed 21 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• J Boivin, L Bunting, JA Collins. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduction. 22(6): 2007; 1506–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Sorenson, P Mladovsky. Assisted Reproduction Technologies in Europe: An Overview, Research Note. European Commission Directorate-General Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Social and Demographic Analysis. 2006; London School of Economics and Political Science: London.
   Google Scholar
• M Inhorn. Right to assisted reproductive technology: overcoming infertility in low-resource countries. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 106: 2009; 172–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Whittaker. Global technologies and transnational reproduction in Thailand. Asian Studies Review. 33: 2009; 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HW Jones Jr, I Cooke, R Kempers. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance. 2010. At: <http://iffs-reproduction.org/documents/IFFS_Surveillance_2010.pdf. >. Accessed 15 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• E Vayena, HB Peterson. Assisted reproductive technologies in developing countries: are we caring yet?. Fertility and Sterility. 92(2): 2009; 413–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E Blyth, A Farrand. Reproductive tourism: a price worth paying for reproductive autonomy?. Critical Social Policy. 25(1): 2005; 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G Pennings. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Human Reproduction. 19(12): 2004; 2689–2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WS Janjaroen, S Supakankunti. International trade in health services in the millennium: the case of Thailand. N Drager, C Vieira. Trade in Health Services: Global, Regional, and Country Perspectives. 2002; PAHO: Washington DC, 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• R Chanda. Trade in health services. N Drager, C Vieira. Trade in Health Services: Global, Regional, and Country Perspectives. 2002; PAHO: Washington DC, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• RD Smith. Foreign direct investment and trade in health services: a review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine. 59: 2004; 2313–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Wibulpolprasert, P Cha-aim, S Pitayarangsarit. International service trade and its implications for human resources for health: a case study of Thailand. Human Resources for Health. 2(10): 2004. At: <www.human-resources-health.com/content/2/1/10. >.
   Google Scholar
• N Scheper-Hughes, LJD Wacquant. Commodifying Bodies. 2002; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• CL Kerian. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children?. Wisconsin Women's Law Journal. 12: 1997; 113–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L Cohen. Operability, bioavailability and exception. A Ong, SJ Collier. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. 2005; Blackwell Publishing: Malden.
   Google Scholar
• A Donchin. Reproductive tourism and the quest for global gender justice. Bioethics. 24(7): 2010; 323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Humbryd. Fair trade in international surrogacy. Developing World Bioethics. 9(3): 2009; 111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande A. Commercial surrogate mothering in India: nine months of labor? PhD thesis, Amherst: University of Massachusetts; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vora K. Selling potential: surplus fertility and biocapital in the production of transnational Indian surrogacy. Paper presented at American Anthropological Association 107th Annual Meeting. San Francisco, 19–23 November 2008.
   Google Scholar
• A Pande. Commercial surrogacy in India: manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 35(4): 2009; 969–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I Qadeer. Benefits and threats of international trade in health: a case of surrogacy in India. Global Social Policy. 10: 2010; 303–305.
   Google Scholar
• BC Heng. Regulatory safeguards needed for the traveling foreign egg donor. Human Reproduction. 22(8): 2007; 2350–2352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai police free women from surrogate baby ring. Agence France-Presse. Updated: 24 February 2011. Accessed 14 April 2011. At: <http://news.malaysia.msn.com/regional/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4666323. >.
   Google Scholar
• R Storrow. Quests for conception: fertility tourists, globalization and feminist legal theory. Hastings Legal Journal. 57: 2005; 295–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrow R. Legal aspects of cross-border reproductive care. Paper presented at Reproductive Tourism: Travelling for Conception and the Global ART Market. CRASSH, University of Cambridge, 3–5 December 2010.
   Google Scholar
• N Cortez. Patients without borders: the emerging global market for patients and the evolution of modern health care. Indiana Law Journal. 83: 2008; 71–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Whittaker. Challenges of medical travel to global regulation: a case study of cross-border reproductive care in Asia. Global Social Policy. 10(3): 2010; 396–415.
   Google Scholar
• Gurtin-Broadbent Z. Banning “reproductive tourism” – the Turkish experience. Paper presented at Cross Border Reproductive Care: Travelling for Conception and the Global ART Market. CRASSH, Cambridge University, 3–5 December 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Government of New South Wales. New South Wales Surrogacy Act 2010 No.102. At: <www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/sessionalview/sessional/act/2010-102.pdf. >. Accessed 11 March 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Queensland. Queensland Surrogacy Act 2010. Act No.2 of 2010. At: <www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2010/10AC002.pdf. >. Accessed 11 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• P Thorn, S Dill. The role of patients' organizations in cross-border reproductive care. Fertility and Sterility. 94(1): 2010; e23–e24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Fidler, N Drager, K Lee. Trade and health: managing the pursuit of health and wealth: the key challenges. Lancet. 373: 2009; 325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar