Care and the 53rd Commission on the Status of Women: a transformative policy space?

References

• Commission on Status of Women. Short History of the Commission on the Status of Women. 2006. At: <http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/CSW60YRS/CSWbriefhistory.pdf. >. Accessed 14 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• E Lombardo, P Meir, M Verloo. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, bending and policymaking. 2009; Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Division for the Advancement of Women. Background note on the 53rd Session of the CSW. 2009; UN: New York. (On file with author).
   Google Scholar
• Addati L, Cassirer N.. Background Paper. Presented at: CSW Expert Group Meeting. Geneva, 6–9 October, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Status of Women. Report on the fifty-third session (2–13 March 2009). Economic and Social Council Official Records, E/2009/27E/CN.6/2009/15. 2009; UN: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Status of Women. 53rd Session. At: <www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/53sess.htm. >. Accessed 26 November 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Division for the Advancement of Women. UN CSW Backgrounder: the equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men, including caregiving in the context of HIV/AIDS. 2009. At: <www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw53/media/CSW53_backgrounder.pdf. >. Accessed 24 July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• UN Secretary General. Progress in mainstreaming a gender perspective in the development, implementation and evaluation of national policies and programmes, with a particular focus on the equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men, including caregiving in the context of HIV/AIDS. E/CN.6/2009/4. UN: New York, 2–13 March 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R Petchesky. Rights of the body and perversions of war: ten years past Beijing. UNESCO's International Social Science Journal. 57(2): 2005; 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• S Corrêa, S Jolly. Development's encounter with sexuality: essentialism and beyond. A Cornwall, S Corrêa, S Jolly. Development with a Body: Sexuality, Human Rights and Development. 2008; Zed Books: London, 22–42.
   Google Scholar
• A Riles. The Network Inside Out. 2000; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• D Buss, D Herman. Globalizing Family Values: The Christian Right in International Politics. 2003; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• K Bedford. Developing Partnerships: Gender, Sexuality, and the Reformed World Bank. 2009; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS/UNIFEM. Caregiving in the context of HIV/AIDS. Presented at: CSW Expert Group Meeting. Geneva, 6–9 October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel V. A. “macro” view on equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men. Presented at: CSW Expert Group Meeting. Geneva, 6–9 October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock D, Weston M.. Men and care in the context of HIV and AIDS: structure, political will and greater male involvement. Presented at: CSW Expert Group Meeting. Geneva, 6–9 October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• UN Secretary General. The equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men, including caregiving in the context of HIV/AIDS. E/CN.6/2009/2. 2009; UN: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Division for the Advancement of Women. The equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men, including caregiving in the context of HIV/AIDS: Report of the Expert Group Meeting, 6–9 October 2008. 2008; UN: New York.
   Google Scholar
• G Sen. Neolibs, neocons and gender justice: lessons from global negotiations. Occasional Paper 9. 2005; Geneva: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• International Disability Alliance. CRPD Forum: Informal session on disability and poverty with special reference to the current economic crisis. New York; 3 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• T Kröger. Care research and disability studies: nothing in common?. Critical Social Policy. 29(3): 2009; 398–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G Parker, H Clarke. Making the ends meet: do carers and disabled people have a common agenda?. Policy & Politics. 30(3): 2002; 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F Williams. In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy. 21(4): 2001; 467–493.
   Google Scholar
• C Ungerson. Give them the money: is cash a route to empowerment?. Social Policy & Administration. 31(1): 1997; 45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Oldman. Later life and the social model of disability: a comfortable partnership?. Ageing & Society. 22: 2002; 791–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K Rummery. Disabled citizens and social exclusion: the role of direct payments. Policy and Politics. 34(4): 2006; 633–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Lyon. A systems approach to direct payments: a response to ‘Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments’. Critical Social Policy. 25(2): 2005; 240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Spandler. Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments. Critical Social Policy. 24(2): 2004; 187–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic and Social Council. Women's Commission ends session, calls for shared responsibility for caregiving between men, women in context of HIV/AIDS, reducing care burden on households. 16–17 March 2009. Dept of Public Information, News and Media Division: New York.
   Google Scholar
• C Rothschild. Written out: how sexuality is used to attack women's organizing. IGLHRC/CWGL. 2000; Center for Women's Global Leadership: New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar