Effective social justice advocacy: a theory-of-change framework for assessing progress

References

• N Fraser. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. 1997; Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• N Fraser. Social Justice in the Knowledge Society: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. Beitrag Zum Kongress “Gut zu Wissen.” Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung. 26 October 2006. At: <http://wissensgesellschaft.org/themen/orientierung/socialjustice.pdf. >. Accessed 17 August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• S Gruskin, L Ferguson. Using indicators to determine the contribution of human rights to public health efforts: Why? What? and How?. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 87: 2009; 714–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Christie, M Alkin. The user-oriented evaluator's role in formulating a program theory: using a theory- driven approach. American Journal of Evaluation. 24: 2003; 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Mackinnon, N Amott. Mapping a change: using a theory of change to guide planning and evaluation. GrantCraft. 15: 2006. At: <www.grantcraft.org/index.cfm?pageId=808. >. Accessed 14 August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J Kingdon. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2002; Longman: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Coffman J. Advocacy evaluation trends and practice advice. Advocacy Impact Evaluation Workshop. Seattle: Gates Foundation. Marc Lindenberg Center, University of Washington, Evans School of Public Affairs; 2 December 2007.
   Google Scholar
• K Guthrie, J Louie, T David, C Foster. The challenges of assessing policy and advocacy activities: strategies for a prospective evaluation approach. 2005; California Endowment. At: <www.calendow.org/reference/publications/pdf/npolicy/51565_CEAdvocacyBook8FINAL.pdf. >. Accessed 15 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• D Leat. Theories of Social Change. International Network on Strategic Philanthropy. Paper 4. 2005; Bertelsmann Stiftung: Washington, DC. At: <www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Inst/0021E1B7-007EA7AB.0/Leat%202005%20Theories_of_change.pdf. >. Accessed 15 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• D Puttenney. Measuring social change investments. 2002; Women's Funding Network. At: <www.wfnet.org. >. Accessed 16 August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• B Klugman. Module 5: Policy. S Ravindran. Transforming Health Systems: Gender and Rights in Reproductive Health: A training curriculum for health programme managers. WHO/RHR/01.29. 2002; World Health Organization: Geneva, 299–380. At: <www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/transforming_healthsystems_gender/index.html. >. Accessed 15 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• B Klugman. Empowering women through the policy process: the making of health policy in South Africa. H Presser, G Sen. Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo. 2000; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 95–118.
   Google Scholar
• M Pastor, R Ortiz. Making change: how social movements work and how to support them. 2009; Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, University of Southern California: Los Angeles. At: <www.calendow.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Policy/General/Making%20Change%20-%20March%202009.pdf. >. Accessed 18 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• L Korwin. The Catalyst Fund Theory of Change. 2009; Korwin Consulting for the Tides Foundation: San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• J Reisman, A Gienapp, S Stachowiak. A Guide to Measuring Advocacy and Policy. 2007; Organizational Research Services: Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• C Albertyn, S Meer. Citizens or mothers? The marginalization of women's reproductive rights in the struggle for access to health care for HIV-positive pregnant women in South Africa. M Mukhopadhyay, S Meer. Gender Rights and Development: A Global Source Book, Gender Society and Development Series. 2008; Royal Tropical Institute: Amsterdam, 27–55. At: <www.kit.nl/net/KIT_Publicaties_output/ShowFile2.aspx?e=1456. >. Accessed 9 December 2010.
   Google Scholar
• B Klugman, M Stevens, K Arends. Developing women's health policy in South Africa from the grassroots. Reproductive Health Matters. 3(6): 1995; 122–131.
   Google Scholar
• G Marcus, S Budlender. A strategic evaluation of public interest litigation in South Africa. 2008; Atlantic Philanthropies: Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• D Robins. From revolution to rights in South Africa: social movements, NGOs and popular politics after apartheid. 2009; University of KwaZulu-Natal Press: Pietermaritzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Klugman B, Mokoetle K. Report on civil society's engagement with sexual and reproductive health and rights and opportunities for identifying an IPPF affiliate in South Africa. International Planned Parenthood Federation, Africa Region. 2010. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Saving mothers. Second report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in South Africa 1999–2001. 2003; Department of Health: Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• R Jewkes, H Rees, K Dickson. The impact of age on the epidemiology of incomplete abortion in South Africa after legislative change. BJOG. 112: 2005; 355–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. White Paper on Population Policy. Pretoria: Ministry for Welfare and Population Development; April 1988. Notice 1930 of 1998. Government Gazette 399(19230). 7 September 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National Contraception Policy Guidelines – Within a Reproductive Health Framework. 2001; Department of Health: Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening Programme. 2000; Department of Health: Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee on a Confidential Inquiry into Maternal Deaths in South Africa. Saving Mothers 2005–2007: Fourth Report on Confidential Inquiries into Maternal Deaths in South Africa – Expanded Executive Summary. 2007; National Department of Health: Pretoria. At: <www.doh.gov.za/docs/reports/2007/savingmothers.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• D Bradshaw, M Chopra, K Kerber. Every Death Counts. 2008; South African National Department of Health: Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• B Anderson, H Phillips. Adult mortality (age 15–64) based on death notification and data in South Africa: 1997–2004. 2005; Statistics South Africa: Pretoria. At: <www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-09-05/Report-03-09-052004.pdf. >. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• M Khan, T Pillay, J Moodley. Maternal mortality associated with tuberculosis–HIV-1 co-infection in Durban, South Africa. AIDS. 15: 2001; 1857–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Department of Health. Annual Report 2009/10. 2010:3. Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Margaret Hoffman, Professor, Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine Health Sciences Faculty, University of Cape Town. Personal communication, March 2011.
   Google Scholar
• D Devlin-Foltz. Impact evaluation tools and methods: learning to live with imprecision and like it (mostly). Advocacy Impact Evaluation Workshop. 2 December. 2007; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• C Letts, W Ryan, A Grossman. High Performance Nonprofit Organizations: Managing Upstream for Greater Impact. 1999; Wiley: New York.
   Google Scholar
• J Martineau, K Hannum. Handbook of Leadership Development Evaluation. 2007; Jossey-Bass/Center for Creative Leadership: San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• S Ospina, E Schall. Leadership (re)constructed: how lens matters. 2001; APPAM Research Conference: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• R Heifetz, D Laurie. The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review. January–February: 1997; 124–134.
   Google Scholar
• H Rees, J Katzenellenbogen, R Shabodien. The epidemiology of incomplete abortion in South Africa. South African Medical Journal. 87: 1997; 432–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Jewkes, H Brown, K Dickson-Tetteh. Prevalence of morbidity associated with abortion before and after legalisation in South Africa. BMJ. 324: 2002; 1252–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B Klugman, S Varkey. From policy development to policy implementation: the South African Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act. B Klugman, D Budlender. Advocating for Abortion Access: Eleven Country Studies. 2001; Johannesburg Initiative, Women's Health Project, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand. 251–282.
   Google Scholar
• S Friedman, S Mottiar. A moral to the tale: the Treatment Action Campaign and the politics of HIV/AIDS. 2004; Center for Civil Society, University of KwaZulu-Natal.
   Google Scholar
• A Boaz, S Fitzpatrick, B Shaw. Assessing the impact of research on policy: a review of the literature for a project on bridging research and policy through outcome evaluation. Policy Studies Institute. 2008; Kings College: London. At: <www.psi.org.uk/pdf/2008/bridgingproject_report_with_appendices.pdf. >. Accessed 20 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J Young. Impact of research on policy and practice. 2008. At: <www.capacity.org/en/content/pdf/4877. >. Accessed 15 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• S Varkey, S Fonn, M Ketlhapile. The role of advocacy in implementing the South African abortion law. Reproductive Health Matters. 8(16): 2000; 103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E Mitchell, K Trueman, M Gabriel. Building alliances from ambivalence: evaluation of abortion values clarification workshops with stakeholders in South Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 9(3): 2005; 89–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Sutton. The Policy Process: An Overview. 1999; Overseas Development Institute: London.
   Google Scholar
• J Trostle, M Bronfman, A Langer. How do researchers influence decision-makers? Case studies of Mexican policies. Health Policy and Planning. 14(2): 1999; 103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Allan, D McAdam, D Pellow. What is the role of civil society in social change? Successful Social Movements. 2010. At: <http://chrisallan.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Supporting-successful-movements3.pdf. >. Accessed 26 September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• S Jacobs, K Johnson. Media, social movements and the state: competing images of HIV/AIDS in South Africa. African Studies Quarterly. 9(4): 2007. At: <www.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v9/v9i4a8.htm. >.
   Google Scholar
• M Mbali. A long illness: towards a history of NGO, government and medical discourse around AIDS policy-making in South Africa. Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of an Honours Degree in History. December. 2001; University of Kwa-Zulu/Natal: Durban.
   Google Scholar
• M Stevens. From HIV prevention to reproductive health choices: HIV/AIDS treatment guidelines for women of reproductive age. African Journal of AIDS Research. 7(3): 2008; 353–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Eyakuze, D Jones, A Starrs. From PMTCT to a more comprehensive AIDS response for women: a much-needed shift. Developing World Bioethics. 8(1): 2008; 33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Schneider. On the fault-line: the politics of AIDS policy in contemporary South Africa. African Studies. 61: 2001; 1.
   Google Scholar
• D Fassin, H Schneider. The politics of AIDS in South Africa: beyond the controversies. BMJ. 326: 2003; 495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F Westley, B Zimmerman, M Patton. Getting to Maybe: How the World is Changed. 2007; Vintage Canada: Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• R Shaw. The Activist's Handbook: A Primer. 2001; University of California Press: Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• J Chapman. Monitoring and evaluating advocacy. PLA Notes. 43: 2002; 48–52. At: <www.planotes.org/documents/plan_04316.pdf. >. Accessed 15 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J Helzner. Guidelines on monitoring and evaluation: considerations for project design, implementation, and reporting. 2006; John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation: Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• K Newton. May the weak force be with you: the power of the mass media in modern politics. European Journal of Political Research. 45: 2006; 209–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Souter. The challenge of assessing the impact of information and communications on development. Building communication opportunities briefing. At: <www.bcoalliance.org/system/files/BCO_Synthesis_web_EN.pdf. >. Accessed 7 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• E Mitchell, K Trueman, M Gabriel. Building alliances from ambivalence: evaluation of abortion values clarification workshops with stakeholders in South Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 9(3): 2005; 89–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Jewkes, M Nduna, J Levin. Evaluation of Stepping Stones: a gender transformation HIV prevention intervention. Policy Brief. March. 2007; Medical Research Council: Pretoria. At: <www.mrc.ac.za/policybriefs/steppingstones.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• W Onyango-Ouma, R Laisser, M Mblilma. An evaluation of Health Workers for Change in seven settings: a useful management and health system development tool. Health Policy and Planning. 16(Suppl.1): 2001; 24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E Mitchell, K Trueman, M Gabriel. Accelerating the pace of progress in South Africa: an evaluation of the impact of values clarification workshops on termination of pregnancy access in Limpopo Province. 2004; Ipas: Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• M Grindle, J Thomas. Public Choices and Policy Change. 1991; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar