References
- World Health Organization. Adolescent health. www.who.int/topics/adolescent_health/en/
- United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf
- RJ Cook. Recognizing adolescents' ‘evolving capacities’ to exercise choice in reproductive healthcare. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 70(13): 2000
- S Keanne Kives. Adolescent consent in reproductive and sexual health decision-making: should there be an arbitrary age of consent or should it be based on the ‘evolving capacities of the child’?. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 21(47): 2008
- International Council on Human Rights Policy. Sexual health and human rights in the European region. 2012. http://www.ichrp.org/files/reports/71/140_sexual_health_european_region.pdf
- T Hammarberg. Human rights and gender identity. 2009. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1476365#P36_1307
- Hastings Center. Guidelines on termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. 1987; Indiana University Press: Bloomington.
- K Mutcherson. Whose body is it anyway? An updated model of healthcare decision-making rights for adolescents. Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy. 14(251): 2004–2005; 257–285.
- G Lansdown. The evolving capacities of the child. 2005. www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/evolving-eng.pdf
- RG Hartman. Adolescent decisional autonomy: clarifying an ageless conundrum. Hastings Law Journal. 51(1265): 2000; 1268–1310.
- Código de la Infancia y la Adolescencia. 2006. http://apps.mintrabajo.gov.co/siriti/info/codigo_infancia_y_adolescencia_ley_1098_de_2006_comentado.pdf
- Código Civil de Colombia: Article 288. 1887. www.oas.org/dil/esp/Codigo_Civil_Colombia.pdf
- Constitución Política de la Republica de Colombia: Article 44. 1991. http://pdba.georgetown.edu/constitutions/colombia/col91.html
- Colombian Constitutional Court. Decision T-474. 1996. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/t%2D474%2D96.htm
- Colombian Constitutional Court. Decision T-477. 1995. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1995/t%2D477%2D95.htm
- R Hartman. Adolescent decisional autonomy for medical care: health care provider perceptions and practices. University of Chicago Law School Roundtable. 8(87): 2001; 91.
- United States Supreme Court. Belloti v. Baird. 1979. 443 USA 622:636.
- J Ehrlich. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Berkeley Women's Law Journal. 18(61): 2003; 68–69.
- H Beh, M Diamond. David Reimer's legacy: limiting parental discretion. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender. 12(5): 2005; 25–27.
- United States Supreme Court. Parham v. JR. 1979. 442 USA 582:602.
- M Goodwin, N Duke. Capacity and autonomy: a thought experiment on minors' access to assisted reproductive technology. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender. 34(503): 2011; 538–539.
- R Stenger. Exclusive or concurrent competence to make medical decisions for adolescents in the United States and United Kingdom. Journal of Law & Health. 14(209): 1999–2000; 211–214.
- GLAAD. Media reference guide. www.glaad.org/files/MediaReferenceGuide2010.pdf
- Global Action for Trans* Equality. Trans*. http://transactivists.org/trans/
- E Coleman, W Bockting, M Botzer. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. International Journal of Transgenderism. 13(165): 2011; 168–208.
- E Skougard. The best interests of transgender children. Utah Law Review. 3(1161): 2011; 1175–1177.
- Decreto No. 608: Article 2(d). 2007. http://app.idu.gov.co/boletin_alejandria/1102_080204/doc/legislacion/DE-608-07.pdf.
- E Restrepo Zea, M Dominguez Blanco, O Vileikis Pinilla. Reasignación sexual y disforia de género en Colombia: una aproximación histórica a los saberes y las prácticas relacionadas con la transexualidad. http://ensambladoencolombia.org/inicio/documentos/maelviadominguez/reasignacionsexual.pdf
- S Shield. The doctor won't see you now: rights of transgender adolescents to sex reassignment treatment. New York University Review of Law & Social Change. 31(361): 2007; 362–428.
- Supreme Court of Tennessee. Cardwell v. Bechtol. 1987. 724 S.W.2d 739:745–747.
- National Health Law Program. Abortion, judicial bypass, and recusal. www.healthlaw.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=433%3Aabortion-judicial-bypass-recusal&catid=40&Itemid=194
- Accord Alliance. Frequently asked questions. www.accordalliance.org/learn-about-dsd/faq.html
- Intersex Society of North America. What is intersex?. www.isna.org/faq/what_is_intersex
- K Karkazis, A Tamar-Mattis, A Kon. Genital surgery for disorders of sex development: implementing a shared-decision-making approach. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 23(789): 2010
- P Lee, C Houk, S Ahmed. Consensus statement of management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics. 118(e488): 2006
- K Karkazis. Fixing Sex. 2008; Duke University Press: Durham.
- J Greenburg. Health care issues affecting people with an intersex condition or DSD: sex or disability discrimination?. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 45(849): 2012
- P Martin. Moving toward an international standard in informed consent: the impact of intersexuality and the internet on the standard of care. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy. 9(137): 2002; 162–167.
- Colombian Constitutional Court. Decision T-551/99. 1999. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1999/t%2D551%2D99.htm
- Colombian Constitutional Court. Decision SU-337/99. 1999. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1999/su337%2D99.htm
- J Greenberg. International legal developments protecting the autonomy rights of sexual minorities: who should decide the appropriate treatment for an intersex child?. Ethics and Intersex. 87: 2006; 91–92.
- Colombian Constitutional Court. Decision T-1021/03. 2003. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/t%2D1021%2D03.htm
- J Greenberg, C Chase. Colombia high court restricts intersex genital mutilation. www.isna.org/node/21
- Colombian Constitutional Court. Decision T-1025/02. 2002. www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2002/T-1025-02.htm
- H Beh, M Diamond. An emerging ethical and medical dilemma: should physicians perform sex assignment surgery on infants with ambiguous genitalia?. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law. 7(1): 2000; 2–4.
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Evaluation of newborn with developmental anomalies of the external genitalia. Pediatrics. 106(138): 2000
- J Rosato. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified. Temple Law Review. 73(1): 2000
- UN Treaty Collection. http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en.
- International Planned Parenthood Federation. Sexual rights: an IPPF declaration. 2008. www.ippfwhr.org/sites/default/files/files/SexualRightsIPPFdeclaration.pdf
- International Women's Health Coalition. The human rights of children and their sexual and reproductive health. (Undated, c. 2001). http://reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/documents/pub_fac_adoles_rtsofchildren.pdf