References
- Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Decreto-Lei n° 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal [internet]. Diário Oficial da União; 31 dez. 1940. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848.htm
- Supremo Tribunal Federal. Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental n° 54. Diário da Justiça Eletrônico n° 78/2012. http://www.stf.jus.br/portal/diarioJustica/verDiarioProcesso.asp?numDj=77&dataPublicacaoDj=20/04/2012&incidente=2226954&codCapitulo=2&numMateria=10&codMateria=4
- D Diniz, M Medeiros. Aborto no Brasil: uma pesquisa domiciliar com técnica de urna. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 15(Suppl.1): 2010; 959–966.
- A Faúndes, E Leocádio, J Andalaft. Making legal abortion accessible in Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters. 10(19): 2002; 120–127.
- WV Villela, MJO Araújo. Making legal abortion available in Brazil: partnerships in practice. Reproductive Health Matters. 8(16): 2000; 77–82.
- L Finer, JB Fine. Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback. American Journal of Public Health. 103(4): 2013; 585–589.
- RJ Cook, MA Olaya, BM Dickens. Healthcare responsibilities and conscientious objection. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 104(3): 2009; 249–252.
- Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Norma Técnica: Prevenção e tratamento dos agravos resultantes da violência sexual contra mulheres e adolescentes. 2.ed. Brasília; 2005.
- Conselho Federal de Medicina. Código de Ética Médica. Brasília; 2009. http://www.cremers.org.br/pdf/codigodeetica/codigo_etica.pdf
- D Diniz. Conscientious objection and abortion: rights and duties of public sector physicians. Revista de Saúde Pública. 45(5): 2011; 981–985.
- A Faúndes, GA Duarte, J Andalaft-Neto. Conhecimento, opinião e conduta de ginecologistas e obstetras brasileiros sobre o aborto induzido. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 26(2): 2004; 89–96.
- LA Goldman, SG García, J Díaz. Brazilian obstetrician-gynecologists and abortion: a survey of knowledge, opinions and practice. Reproductive Health. 2: 2005; 10.
- A Faúndes, GA Duarte, MH Sousa. Brazilians have different views on when abortion should be legal, but most do not agree with imprisoning women for abortion. Reproductive Health Matters. 21(42): 2013; 1–9.
- LH Harris, A Cooper, KA Rasinski. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 118(4): 2011; 905–912.
- KA Rasinski, JD Yoon, YG Kalad. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment. Journal of Medical Ethics. 37(12): 2011; 711–712.
- S Zordo. Representações e experiências sobre aborto ilegal e legal dos ginecologistas-obstetras trabalhando em dois hospitais maternidade de Salvador da Bahia. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 17(7): 2012; 1745–1754.
- M Greenberg, C Herbitter, B Gawinski. Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: the Reproductive Health Program. Family Medicine. 44(7): 2011; 493–500.
- M Donohoe. Increase in obstacles to abortion: the American perspective in 2004. Journal of American Medical Women’s Association. 60(1): 2005; 16–25.
- J Downie, C Nassar. Barriers to access to abortion through a legal lens. Health Law Journal. 15: 2007; 143–173.
- DA Grimes. Estimating of pregnancy-related mortality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991 to 1999. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 194(1): 2006; 92–94.
- M Magelssen. When should conscientious objection be accepted?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 38(1): 2012; 18–21.
- ED Amado, MCC García, KR Cristancho. Obstacles and challenges following the partial decriminalisation of abortion in Colombia. Reproductive Health Matters. 18(36): 2010; 118–126.
- FA Curlin, RE Lawrence, MH Chin. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. New England Journal of Medicine. 356: 2007; 593–600.