References
- Western Cape Department of Health. Provincial policy standardized guidelines and protocols on the termination of pregnancy services. Circular H157/2010. Cape Town, 2010.
- J Harries, K Stinson, P Orner. Health care providers’ attitudes towards termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 9: 2009; 296.
- M Kawonga, K Blanchard, D Cooper. Integrating medical abortion into safe abortion services: experience from three pilot sites in South Africa. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 34: 2008; 159–164.
- D Cooper, K Dickson, K Blanchard. Medical abortion: the possibilities for introduction in the public sector in South Africa. Reproductive Health Matters. 3(26): 2005; 35–43.
- M Fjerstad. Figuring out follow-up. Mife Matters. Planned Parenthood Federation of America/Coalition of Abortion Providers. 13: 2006; 2–3.
- World Health Organization. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd ed, 2012; WHO: Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70914/1/9789241548434_eng.pdf.
- K Lynd, J Blum, NT Ngoc. Simplified medical abortion using a semi-quantitative pregnancy test for home-based follow-up. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 121: 2013; 144–148.
- W Clark, H Bracken, J Tanenhaus. Alternatives to a routine follow-up visit for early medical abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 115(2,Pt1): 2010; 264–272.
- H Bracken, B Winikoff, PA Lohr. RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion. Contraception. 2014; 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.016.
- MH Park, TH Nguyen, ATN Dang. Medical abortion practices among private providers in Vietnam. International Journal of Women’s Health. 5: 2013; 593–598.
- B Rossi, MD Creinin, LA Meyn. Ability of the clinician and patient to predict the outcome of mifepristone and misoprostol medical abortion. Contraception. 70(4): 2004; 313–317.
- HC Pymar, MD Creinin, JL Schwartz. Mifepristone followed on the same day by vaginal misoprostol for early abortion. Contraception. 64: 2001; 87–92.
- AV Jackson, I Dayananda, JM Fortin. Can women accurately assess the outcome of medical abortion based on symptoms alone?. Contraception. 85(2): 2012; 192–197.
- LK Perriera, MF Reeves, BA Chen. Feasibility of telephone follow-up after medical abortion. Contraception. 81(2): 2010; 143–149.
- ST Cameron, A Glasier, H Dewart. Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation. Contraception. 86(1): 2012; 67–73.
- L Michie, ST Cameron. Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test. Contraception. 89(5): 2014; 440–445.
- RJ Gomperts, K Jelinska, S Davies. Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe services. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 115: 2008; 1171–1178.
- RJ Gomperts, K van der Vleuten, K Jelinska. Provision of medical abortion using telemedicine in Brazil. Contraception. 89(2): 2014; 129–133.
- J Blum, T Shochet, K Lynd. Can at-home semi-quantitative pregnancy tests serve as a replacement for clinical follow-up of medical abortion?. A US study. Contraception. 86(6): 2012; 757–762.
- D Grossman, K Grindlay. Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review. Contraception. 83(6): 2011; 504–510.
- D Constant, K de Tolly, J Harries. Mobile phone messages to provide support to women during the home phase of medical abortion in South Africa: a randomised, controlled trial. Contraception. 2014; 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.009.
- K De Tolly, D Constant. Integrating mobile phones into medical abortion provision: intervention development, use, and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research: mHealth and uHealth. 2(1): 2014
- MF Reeves, CM Fox, PA Lohr. Endometrial thickness following medical abortion is not predictive of subsequent surgical intervention. Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynecology. 34: 2009; 104–109.