Using litigation to defend women prosecuted for abortion in Mexico: challenging state laws and the implications of recent court judgments

References

• Mexican Constitutional Article 20, Section A, Fraction II. https://www.scjn.gob.mx/normativa/ConstEnglish/CONSTI%20INGLES%20SEPT%202010.pdf and Article 8.2, Letter G, American Convention on Human Rights. http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.htm.
   Google Scholar
• A Sousa, R Lozano, E Gakidou. Exploring the determinants of unsafe abortion: improving the evidence base in Mexico. Health Policy and Planning. 25(4): 2010; 300–310. 10.1093/heapol/czp06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mexico City Ministry of Health. El programa de interrupción legal del embarazo en la Ciudad de México: Una isla de libertades. 2013; Mexico City Ministry of Health and National Pro-Choice Alliance in Mexico: Mexico City, 91.
   Google Scholar
• X Contreras. Experiences and opinions of health-care professionals regarding legal abortion in Mexico City: a qualitative study. Studies in Family Planning. 42(3): 2011; 186–188. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIRE. Cifras sobre la interrupción legal del embarazo en la Ciudad de México: lugar de residencia y método médico. 2014. http://www.gire.org.mx/images/stories/com/EstadistILE_web_ago2014.docx.
   Google Scholar
• M Mondragon y Kalb, A Ahued Ortega, J Morales Velázquez, C Díaz Olavarrieta, J Valencia Rodríguez, D Becker, S García. Patient characteristics and service trends following abortion legalization in Mexico City, 2007–2010. Studies in Family Planning. 42(3): 2011; 163. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G Ortiz-Barreda, C Vives-Cases. Violencia contra las mujeres: el papel del sector salud en la legislación internacional. Gaceta Sanitaria. 26(5): 2012; 483–489. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. Ruling on Unconstitutionality Claim 10/2000. 29–30 January 2002. http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID=37867.
   Google Scholar
• Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. Ruling on Unconstitutionality Claim 146/2007 and accompanying 147/2007. 28 August 2008. p. 183. http://www.equidad.scjn.gob.mx/IMG/pdf/AI_146–2007_y_acumulada_Despenalizacion_del_aborto_en_el_DF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mexican Supreme Court of Justice, Unconstitutionality Claim 11/2009, promoted by the Baja California Office for Human Rights and Citizen Protection against the Decree that reforms the Constitutional Article 7 of this state https://www.scjn.gob.mx/pleno/Documents/proyectos_resolucion/AI-11-09-BajaCalifornia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Unconstitutionality Claim 62/2009, promoted by the legislators of the 59th Legislature in San Luis Potosí against the Decree that reforms the Constitutional Article 16 of this state https://www.scjn.gob.mx/pleno/Documents/proyectos_resolucion/AI-62-09-SLP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Controversies: CC 062/2009 presented by the Municipality of Uriangato, Guanajuato http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID=110719.
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Controversies CC 104/2009; Municipality of Asunción Ixtaltepec, Oaxaca http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID=113274.
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Controversies CC 89/2009 Municipality of Arroyo Seco, Querétaro http://www2.scjn.gob.mx/ConsultaTematica/PaginasPub/DetallePub.aspx?AsuntoID=112412.
   Google Scholar
• Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. Ordinary Public Sessions of the Supreme Court, 28–29 September 2011, resolving the Unconstitutionality Claim 11/2009, https://www.scjn.gob.mx/PLENO/ver_taquigraficas/pl20110928v2.pdf and Unconstitutionality Claim 62/2009, https://www.scjn.gob.mx/PLENO/ver_taquigraficas/pl20110929v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• See GIRE. Derechos humanos de las mujeres y protección de la vida prenatal en México. 2012. http://gire.org.mx/derechos-humanos-de-las-mujeres-y-proteccion-de-la-vida-prenatal-en-mexico-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mexican Constitutional Article 1. https://www.scjn.gob.mx/normativa/ConstEnglish/CONSTI%20INGLES%20SEPT%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Artavia Murillo et al. (In Vitro Fertilization) v. Costa Rica. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 28, 2012, Series C No. 257, para. 189. http://bit.ly/17COtNC.
   Google Scholar
• The initial petition was submitted to the Commission on 19 January 2001 by Gerardo Trejos Salas. https://www.cidh.oas.org/demandas/12.361Esp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report No. 25/04, Case 12,361, Ana Victoria Sánchez Villalobos et al. Costa Rica, 11 March 2004. http://cidh.org/annualrep/2004eng/CostaRica.12361eng.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Merits Report No. 85/10, Case No. 12,361, Gretel Artavia Murillo et al. v. Costa Rica, 14 July 2010 (Merits File, Folios 7 to 37). https://www.cidh.oas.org/demandas/12.361Esp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gretel Artavia Murillo et al. (“In Vitro Fertilization”), Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 29 July 2011. https://www.cidh.oas.org/demandas/12.361Esp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Convention on Human Rights, Article 4. Pact of San José, Costa Rica, signed and ratified by the Mexican State 24 March 1981. See also Paras. 189, 223, 264, 222, and 263. http://www.oas.org/dil/esp/tratados_B-32_Convencion_Americana_sobre_Derechos_Humanos.htm.
   Google Scholar