Rationing polices on access to in vitro

References

• J. Gunning, V. English. Human In-Vitro Fertilization. 1993. Dartmout.
   Google Scholar
• College of Health. First Report of the National Survey of the Funding and Provision of Infertility Services. 1992; College of Health: London.
   Google Scholar
• V. Stone, J. Riesel. Report of the Fifth National Survey of the funding and Provision of Infertility Services. 1997; College of Health: London.
   Google Scholar
• R. Klein, P. Day, Redmaynes A. Managing Scarcity: Priority setting and rationing in the NHS. 1996; Open University Press: Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper. A National Health Service. 1944; HMSO: London. Cmd. 650.
   Google Scholar
• G. Calabresi, P. Bobbitt. Tragic Choices. 1978; Norton and Company: New York.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Management Executive. Managing the New NHS: Functions and Responsibilities in the New NHS. 1994; NHS Executive: Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Management Executive Department of Health. Statement of Responsibilities and Accountabilities. 1995; Department of Health: London.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Executive. Promoting Clinical Effectiveness: a Framework for Action in and through the NHS. 1996; NHS Executive: Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Management Executive. Local Voices: involving the local community in purchasing decisions. 1992; NHS Executive: Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• S. Redmayne, R. Klein. Rationing in practice:the case of in vitro fertilisation. British Medical Journal. 306: 1993; 1521–1524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S.F. Gray, G. Bevan, S. Frankel. Purchasing Evidence: the corollary of evidence-based purchasing. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 19(1): 1997; 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Fourth Annual Report. 1995; Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority: London.
   Google Scholar
• A. Templeton, J.K. Morris, W. Parslow. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet. 348(9039): 1996; 1394. Nov 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA. Also reported i. Sixth Annual Report. 1997; HFEA: London.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Health Committee. 1st report (session 1994-5): Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing. HC 134-1. 1995; HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• Academy of Medical Royal Colleges British Medical Association National Association of Heath Authorities and Trusts NHS Executive. Priority Setting in the NHS: a discussion document. 1996; South East Institute article Public Health: Tunbridge Wells.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London. Setting priorities in the NHS. 1995; Royal College of Physicians of London: London.
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Assocation Health Policy and Economic Research Unit. Rationing revisited: a discussion paper. Discussion Paper No 4. 1995; Royal College of Physicians of London: London. The following give an insight into the range and breadth of the political and ethical debate on rationing in the NHS at the time the survey was conducted.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Strosberg. Rationing America’s Medical Care: the Oregon Plan and Beyond. 1992; Brookings Institution: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• D. Hadorn. Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregan. Journal of the American Medical Association. 265: 1991; 2218–2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Williams. The economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal. 291: 1985; 326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Maynard. Logic in medicine. British Medical Journal. 295: 1987; 1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Crisp. QUALYs and the mentally handicapped. Bulletin ofMedical Ethics. 1991; 13–16. Apri.
   Google Scholar
• J. Harris. QUALYfying the value of lifes. Journal ofMedical Ethics. 13: 1987; 117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Hunter. Desperately Seeking Solutions. 1997; Longman: London.
   Google Scholar
• HC Debs Vol. 174 21st June 1990, Col 1021. Section 13(5) of the Ac.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas G. Assisted Reproduction and the Welfare of the Child. Current Legal Problems. 46:53–74. The survey of clinics conducted by Douglas in 1993 revealed that the aims of those who sought to exclude single women appeared to have succeeded in practice, as clinicians offering IVF treatment tended to restrict treatment to heterosexual couples in a stable relationship. S. Millns. Making ’social judgements that go beyond the purely medical’: The reproductive revolution and access to fertility treatment services. See also. J. Bridgman, S. Millns. Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body. 1995; Dartmouth Publishing Co: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• C. Newdick. Who Should We Treat?. 1995; Clarendon Press: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Lord Donaldson. R v. Secretary of State for Social Services, ex-pare Walker. 3 BMLR 32. 1992
   Google Scholar
• R v Sheffield Health Authority, ex-pare Seale. 17 October 1994. transcrip.
   Google Scholar