Reversing the downward trend in men's share of contraceptive use

References

• United Nations. Programme of Action International Conference on Population and Development. Cairo 1994
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Ninth revision, World Contraceptive Use Data Sheets. 1987, 1994, 1998; United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York. Estimates are based on most recently available country data, from an increasing number of countries over time. It is therefore not possible to obtain exact percentages of contraceptive use that requires male cooperation. In less developed countries, use of male methods fell from 29 per cent of total contraceptive use as reported in 1987 to 25 per cent in 1994 and 20 per cent in 1998. In more developed regions, use of male methods fell from 60 per cent of total use in 1987 to 54 per cent in 1998, largely due to a decline in use of ‘non-supply’ methods, predominantly withdrawal and periodic abstinence. The UN combines withdrawal and periodic abstinence in a ‘nonsupply’ category that includes douching and folk remedies. However, comparison of UN data with country surveys confirms that nearly all of the non-supply category is attributable to withdrawal and periodic abstinence.
   Google Scholar
• J. Helzner. Male involvement in family planning. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 146–154. (May).
   Google Scholar
• R. Gardner, R.D. Blackburn, U.D. Upadhyay. Closing the condom gap. Ninth revision, Population Reports. Series H No. 9. 1999; Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. Ninth revision, World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. 1993; Oxford University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of the Census, 1998. Calculation of demand for contraceptives through 2025, based on UN and census data requested by the author. These figures exclude China, which has 240 million couples of reproductive age and a prevalence of 83 per cent, only 18 per cent of which is due to male method use. See [2].
   Google Scholar
• A.C. Ezeh, M. Seroussi, H. Raggers. Men’s Fertility, Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Preferences. Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies No. 18. 1996; Macro International Inc: Calverton MD.
   Google Scholar
• N. Piet-Pelon, U. Rob, M.E. Khan. Men in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan Reproductive Health Issues. 1999; Hindustan Publishing Corporation: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. Natural Family Planning in the Philippines. 1993; Xavier University Research for Mindanao Culture: New York. Operations research family planning database project summaries, compiled by Population Council.
   Google Scholar
• S. Pinkerton, P. Abramson. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Social Science and Medicine. 44(9): 1999; 1303–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force on Psychosocial Research in Family Planning. User preferences for contraceptive methods in India, Korea, the Philippines and Turkey. Studies in Family Planning. 11: 1980; 267–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force on Psychosocial Research in Family Planning. Hormonal contraception for men: acceptability and effects on sexuality. Studies in Family Planning. 13: 1982; 328–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cummings, W. Bremner. Prospects for new hormonal male contraceptives. Clinical Andrology. 23: 1994; 893–922.
   Google Scholar
• D. Rogow, S. Horowitz. Withdrawal: a review of the literature and an agenda for research. Studies in Family Planning. 26(3): 1995; 140–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Oodit. Withdrawal: a time honored but risky method. Ninth revision, Planned Parenthood Challenges. 2: 1996; IPPF: London.
   Google Scholar
• B.S. Okun. Family planning in the Jewish population of Israel: correlates of withdrawal use. Studies in Family Planning. 28(3): 1997; 215–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Douthwaite, P. Miller, M. Sultana. Couple communication and sexual satisfaction among withdrawal users in Pakistan. Reproductive Health Matters. 6(12): 1998; 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Turkey Demographic and Health Survey^. 1993; Macro International, Inc: Beltsville, MD.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kayani, A. Javed, M. Douthwaite. Pakistan User Satisfaction and Longevity Study. Ninth revision, Research Report No 12. 1998; Population Council: Islamabad.
   Google Scholar
• J. Caldwell, K. Gaminiratne, P. Caldwell. The role of traditional fertility regulation in Sri Lanka. Studies in Family Planning. 18: 1987; 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Lamptey, D. Nicholas, S. OfosuAmaah. An evaluation of male contraceptives in rural Ghana. Studies in Family Planning. 9: 1978; 222–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mbizvo, D. Adamchak. Condom use and acceptance: a survey of male Zimbabweans. Central African Journal of Medicine. 35: 1989; 519–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Knodel, N. Havanon, A. Pramualratana. Prospects for increased condom use within marriage in Thailand. International Family Planning Perspectives. 22(3): 1996; 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• L. Hulton, J. Falkingham. Male contraceptive knowledge and practice: what do we know?. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 90–100.
   Google Scholar
• B. Fapohunda, N. Ruternberg. Expanding Men’s Participation in Reproductive Health in Kenya. 1999; African Population Policy Research Center: Nairobi.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Three hundred and thirty three million new, curable cases in 1995. 1999. WHO (website) http://222.2ho.ch.asd/press.htm
   Google Scholar
• E.T. McNeill, C.E. Gilmore, W.R. Finger. The Latex Condom: Recent Advances, Future Directions. 1998; Family Health International: Research Triangle Park, NC.
   Google Scholar
• J. Martinez-Manautou, D. Hernandes, F. Alarcon. Introduction of no-scalpel vasectomy at the Mexican Social Security Institute. Advances in Contraception. 7: 1991; 193–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Nirapathpongporn, D. Huber, J. Krieger. No-scalpel vasectomy at the King’s birthday vasectomy festival. Lancet. 335: 1990; 894–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Fathalla. Priority Research Needs in Sterilization. Ninth revision, Report No. I. 1978; World Federation of the Associations for Voluntary Sterilization.
   Google Scholar
• Qualitative data collected by the author, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men. Lancet. 336: 1990; 955–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia or oligozoospermia in normal men. Fertility and Sterility. 65: 1996; 821–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ringheim. Whither methods for men? Emerging gender issues in contraception. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 79–89. (May).
   Google Scholar
• B. Atkins, T. Jezowski. Report on the First International Conference on Vasectomy Ninth revision. Studies in Family Planning. 14: 1983; 89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Vernon. Making vasectomy services more acceptable to men. International Family Planning Perspectives. 17: 1991; 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• J. Ross, D. Huber. Acceptance and prevalence of vasectomy in developing countries. Studies in Family Planning. 14: 1983; 67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K. Nigam, S.K. Malik, H.C. Das. A profile of acceptors of no-scalpel vasectomy. Journal of Family Welfare. 40: 1994; 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• T. Jezowski, F. Alaracon, C. Juarez. A Successful National Program for Expanding Vasectomy Services: The Experience of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. AVSC Working Paper No. 8. 1995. May. Available online at www.avsc.org/workpap/wp8.
   Google Scholar
• D.I. Wilkinson, M.N. Wegner, N. Mwageni. Improving vasectomy services in Kenya: lessons from a mystery client study. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 115–121. (May).
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. Africa ORTA Project. Effects of Vasectomy Promotion Project on Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour among Men in Dar es Salaam,Tanzania. Sept (6). Ninth revision, USAID Cooperative Agreement No CCP-3050-A-00-4103-00. 1997
   Google Scholar
• I. DeVincenzi. A longitudinal study of human inmmunodeficiency virus transmission by heterosexual partners. New England Journal of Medicine. 33(16): 1994; 341–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Miller, M. Miller, I. Askew. Clinic-based Family Planning and Reproductive Health Services in Africa: Findings from Situation Analysis Studies. 1998; Population Council: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. A Qualitative Investigation into the Use of Withdrawal. Ninth revision, Final Report. 1998; Ministry of Population Welfare and Population Council: Islamabad.
   Google Scholar
• T. Rahim Promoting contraceptive methods to men in Pakistan: innovations from the field Presentation to AVSC/Reproductive Health Alliance Meeting. London, May 1999,
   Google Scholar
• E. Landry, V. Ward. Perspectives from couples on the vasectomy decision: a sixcountry study. Beyond Acceptability: Users’ Perspectives on Contraception. T.K.S. Ravindran, M. Berer, J. Cottingham. Reproductive Health Matters for WHO, London. 1997
   Google Scholar
• R. Vernon. Operations research on promoting vasectomy in three Latin American Countries. International Family Planning Perspectives. 22(1): 1996; 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• R. Vernon, G. Ojeda, A. Vega. Operations Research on Different Approaches for Vasectomy Service Provision in Colombia. Ninth revision, Final Technical Report. 1989; Asociación ProBienestar de la Familia Colombiana (PROFAMILIA) and Population Council: Bogota.
   Google Scholar
• L. Liskin, E. Benoit, R. Blackburn. Vasectomy: New Opportunities. Ninth revision, Population Reports. Series D, No. 5. 1992; Johns Hopkins University, Population Information Program: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• J. Nerguaye-Tetteh Starting from scratch: meeting men’s needs in Ghana Presentation to AVSC/ Reproductive Health Alliance Europe meeting on Male Contraception: Preparing for the Future. London 1999
   Google Scholar
• F. Alarçon, C. Juarez, V. Ward. Vasectomy DecisionMaking in Mexico. 1995; AVSC International: New York.
   Google Scholar
• D. Gural, T. Gokgol, N. Fincancioglu Vasectomy: an acceptable method in Turkey Paper presented at 121st Annual American Public Health Association meeting. San Francisco, 24–28 October 1993,
   Google Scholar
• V. Lamprecht, V. Grummer-Strawn. Development of new formulas to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception. 54(6): 1996; 339–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Faúndes, M.J.D. Osis, G.A. Duarte. Evaluation of the use of the “Collar” as a natural method of family planning. Ninth revision, Final Report to the Centers for Mothers and Children’s Research of Campinas (CEMICAMP). 1997. Campinas, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• J. Seex. Making space for young men in family planning clinics. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 111–114. (May).
   Google Scholar
• B.A. Rix. The condom challenge. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 107–110. (May).
   Google Scholar
• Condoms: now more than ever. Ninth revision, Population Reports. Vol 18: 1990; Population Information Program, Center for Communications Programs, Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore. No.3.
   Google Scholar
• J. Richters. Researching condoms: the laboratory and the bedroom. Reproductive Health Matters. 4: 1994; 55–62. (Nov).
   Google Scholar
• L. Lin, W. Shizhong, G. Jian. Improving condom use in Sichuan, China: findings from a qualitative study. Reproductive Health Matters. 7: 1996; 101–106. (May).
   Google Scholar
• M. Drennan. Reproductive Health: New Perspectives on Men’s Participation. Ninth revision, Population Reports. Series J, No 46. 1998; Population Information Program, Center for Communications Programs, Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar