Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory

References

• V.BakanicC.McPhailR.J.SimonThe manuscript review and decision-making processAmerican Sociological Review521987631642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.BeattieK.PrattIssues concerning web-based business reporting: An analysis of the views of interested partiesBritish Accounting Review3022003155187
   Google Scholar
• J.M.BeyerR.G.ChanoveW.B.FoxThe review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJAcademy of Management Journal3851995129163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C.BorkowskiM.J.WelshEthics and the accounting publishing process: Author, reviewer and editor issuesJournal of Business Ethics17199817851803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.BrinnM.J.JonesM.PendleburyUK accountants’ perception of research journal qualityAccounting and Business ResearchSummer1996265278
   Google Scholar
• A.BrinnM.J.JonesM.PendleburyUK academic accountants’ perceptions of research and publication practicesBritish Accounting Review3041998313330
   Google Scholar
• L.D.BrownInfluential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis.Accounting, Organizations and Society21781996723754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.D.BrownR.S.HuefnerThe familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA programsContemporary Accounting ResearchSummer1994223250
   Google Scholar
• S.J.CeciD.PetersHow blind is blind review?American PsychologistDecember198414911494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.V.ChicchettiThe reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigationBehavioral and Brain Sciences141991119186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.CraneThe gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journalsAmerican Sociologist31967195201
   Google Scholar
• L.L.CummingsP.J.FrostT.F.VakilThe manuscript review process: A view from the inside on coaches, critics and special casesL.L.CummingsP.J.FrostPublishing in the organisational sciences1985Richard D. Irwin Inc.Illinois
   Google Scholar
• T.J.EngleJ.L.SmithThe ethical standards of accounting academicsIssues in Accounting Education511990730
   Google Scholar
• D.W.FiskeL.FoggBut the reviewers are making different criticism of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer commentsAmerican PsychologistMay1990591598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.W.GillilandJ.M.CortinaReviewer and editor decision making in the journal reviewPersonnel Psychology5021997427452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.D.GottfredsonEvaluating psychological research reports. Dimensions, reliability and correlates of quality judgementsAmerican PsychologistOctober1978920934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.GrayJ.GuthrieL.ParkerRites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: An essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accountingAccounting Forum2612002130
   Google Scholar
• J.R.HasselbackA.ReinsteinA proposal for measuring scholarly productivity of accounting facultyIssues in Accounting Education1021995269306
   Google Scholar
• J.R.HasselbackA.ReinsteinE.S.SchwanBenchmarks for evaluating the performance of accounting facultyJournal of Accounting Education1820007997
   Google Scholar
• J.L.HeckW.G.BremserSix decades of The Accounting Review: A summary of author and institutional contributorsThe Accounting ReviewLX1October (4)1986735743
   Google Scholar
• J.L.HeckR.E.JensenP.L.CooleyAn analysis of contributors to accounting journals, part 1, the aggregate performancesInternational Journal of Accounting251990202217
   Google Scholar
• L.R.JauchJ.L.WallWhat they do when they get your manuscript: A survey of management reviewer processAcademy of Management Journal3211989157173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.G.KaufmanRankings of finance departments by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journals: A noteJournal of FinanceXXXIXSeptember (4)198411891197
   Google Scholar
• D.LabandM.PietteFavoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behaviour of journal editorsJournal of Political Economy10211994194203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A.LeeThe editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academyAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal10119971130
   Google Scholar
• T.A.LeeP.F.WilliamsAccounting from the inside: Legitimizing the accounting academic eliteCritical Perspectives on Accounting101999867895
   Google Scholar
• L.J.MittermaierRepresentation in the editorial boards of academic accounting journals: An analysis of accounting faculties and doctoral programsIssues in Accounting Education6Fall (2)1991221238
   Google Scholar
• G.MorganJournals at the control of knowledge: A critical perspectiveL.L.CummingsP.J.FrostPublishing in the organizational sciences1985Richard D. Irwin Inc.Illinois
   Google Scholar
• L.ParkerJ.GuthrieR.GrayAccounting and management research: Passwords from the gatekeepersAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal1141998371402
   Google Scholar
• L.R.PondyThe reviewer as defence attorneyL.L.CummingsP.J.FrostPublishing in the organizational sciences1985Richard D. Irwin Inc.Illinois
   Google Scholar
• J.L.RodgersP.F.WilliamsPatterns of research productivity and knowledge creation at The Accounting ReviewThe Accounting Historian's Journal23119965188
   Google Scholar
• B.SchneiderSome propositions about getting research publishedL.L.CummingsP.J.FrostPublishing in the organizational sciences1985Richard D. Irwin Inc.Illinois
   Google Scholar
• J.SerebnickIdentifying unethical practices in journal publishingLibrary Trends4021991357372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.L.SherrellJ.F.HairM.GriffinMarketing academicians’ perceptions of ethical research and publishing behaviorJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science1741989315324
   Google Scholar
• M.A.Von GlinowL.NovelliEthical standards within organizational behaviorAcademy of Management Journal2521982417436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.F.WilliamsJ.L.RodgersThe Accounting Review and the production of accounting knowledgeCritical Perspectives on Accounting61995263287
   Google Scholar