A critical analysis of the surgical outcomes for the treatment of Peyronie’s diseaseFootnote

Peer review under responsibility of Arab Association of Urology.

References

• C.J.NelsonJ.P.MulhallPsychological impact of Peyronie’s disease: a reviewJ Sex Med102013653660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M.GreenfieldL.A.LevinePeyronie’s disease: etiology, epidemiology and medical treatmentUrol Clin North Am322005469478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.TalM.HeckP.TelokenT.SiegristC.J.NelsonJ.P.MulhallPeyronie’s disease following radical prostatectomy. Incidence and predictorsJ Sex Med7201012541261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.B.LindsayD.M.SchainP.GrambschR.C.BensonC.M.BeardL.T.KurlandThe incidence of Peyronie’s disease in Rochesterm Minnesota, 1950 through 1984J Urol146199110071009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.SchwarzerF.SommerT.KlotzM.BraunB.ReifenrathU.EngelmannThe prevalence of Peyronie’s disease: results of a large surveyBJU Int882001727730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.La PeraE.S.PescatoriM.CalabreseA.BoffiniF.ColomboE.Adrianiet alPeyronie’s disease. prevalence and association with cigarette smoking. A multicenter population-based study in men aged 50–69 yearsEur Urol402001525530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.B.DibenedettiD.NguyenL.ZografosR.ZiemieckiX.ZhouA population-based study of Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and treatment patterns in the united statesAdv Urol20112011282503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E.L.RhodenC.TelokenH.Y.TingM.L.LucasC.Teodosio da RosC.Ary Vargas SoutoPrevalence of Peyronie’s disease in men over 50-y-old from Southern BrazilInt J Impot Res132001291293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.I.El-SakkaPrevalence of Peyronie’s disease among patients with erectile dysfunctionEur Urol492006564569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P.MulhallS.D.CreechS.A.BoorjianS.GhalyE.D.KimA.Motyet alSubjective and objective analysis of the prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in a population of men presenting for prostate cancer screeningJ Urol171200423502353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.ArafaH.EidA.El-BadryK.Ezz-EldineR.ShamloulThe prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunctionInt J Impot Res192007213217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.I.El-SakkaK.A.TayebPeyronie’s disease in diabetic patients being screened for erectile dysfunctionJ Urol174200510261030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.H.SmithSubclinical Peyronie’s diseaseAm J Clin Path521969385390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.TalM.S.HallB.AlexJ.ChoiJ.P.MulhallPeyronie’s disease in teenagersJ Sex Med92012302308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.K.GelbardF.DoreyK.JamesThe natural history of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol144199013761379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.KadiogluA.TefekliB.ErolT.OktarM.TuncS.TellalogluA retrospective review of 307 men with Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol168200210751079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P.MulhallJ.SchiffP.GuhringAn analysis of the natural history of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol175200621152118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L.WilliamsG.G.ThomasThe natural history of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol10319707576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.J.HellstromT.J.BivalacquaPeyronie’s disease. Etiology, medical, and surgical therapyJ Androl212000347354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.KendirciW.J.HellstromCritical analysis of surgery for Peyronie’s diseaseCurr Opin Urol1262142004381388
   Google Scholar
• H.H.AlphsN.NavaiT.S.KohlerK.T.McVaryPreoperative clinical and diagnostic characteristics of patients who require delayed IPP after primary Peyronies repairJ Sex Med7201012621268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.MulhallM.AndersonM.ParkerA surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomesJ Sex Med22005132138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.FloresJ.ChoiB.AlexJ.P.MulhallErectile dysfunction after plaque incision and grafting: short-term assessment of incidence and predictorsJ Sex Med8201120312037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.A.LevineJ.M.GreenfieldC.R.EstradaErectile dysfunction following surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease and a pilot study of the use of sildenafil citrate rehabilitation for postoperative erectile dysfunctionJ Sex Med22005241247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.L.TaylorM.R.AbernL.A.LevinePredicting erectile dysfunction following surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease without inflatable penile prosthesis placement: vascular assessment and preoperative risk factorsJ Sex Med92012296301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.HatzimouratidisI.EardleyF.GiulianoD.HatzichristouI.MoncadaA.Saloniaet alEAU guidelines on penile curvatureEur Urol622012543552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.RalphN.Gonzalez-CadavidV.MironeS.PerovicM.SohnM.Ustaet alThe management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelinesJ Sex Med7201023592374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.MontorsiG.AdaikanE.BecherF.GiulianoS.KhouryT.F.Lueet alSummary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in menJ Sex Med7201035723588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M.NesbitCongenital curvature of the phallus: report of three cases with description of corrective operationJ Urol931965230232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.F.LueA.I.El-SakkaLengthening shortened penis caused by Peyronie’s disease using circular venous grafting and daily stretching with a vacuum erection deviceJ Urol161199911411144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.PahlajaniR.RainaS.JonesM.AliC.ZippeVacuum erection devices revisited. its emerging role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and early penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer therapyJ Sex Med9201211821189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J.MoskovicA.W.PastuszakL.I.LipshultzM.KheraRevision of penile prosthesis surgery after use of penile traction therapy to increase erect penile length: case report and review of the literatureJ Sex Med82011607611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J.BaileyS.YandeB.WalmsleyJ.P.PryorSurgery for Peyronie’s disease. A review of 200 patientsBr J Urol571985746749
   Google Scholar
• D.J.RalphM.al-AkraaJ.P.PryorThe Nesbit operation for Peyronie’s disease: 16 year experienceJ Urol1541995136213633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.RolleA.TamagnoneM.TimpanoP.DestefanisC.FioriC.Ceruttiet alThe Nesbit operation for penile curvature. an easy and effective technical modificationJ Urol1732005171173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.SavocaF.ScieriF.PietropaoloG.GaraffaE.BelgranoStraightening corporoplasty for Peyronie’s disease. a review of 218 patients with median follow-up of 89 monthsEur Urol462004610614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H.SyedZ.AbbasiT.B.HargreaveNesbit procedure for disabling Peyronie’s curvature. a median follow-up of 84 monthsUrology6120039991003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.BokaricaJ.ParazajderB.MazuranI.GiljaSurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease based on penile length and degree of curvatureInt J Impot Res172005170174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R.LichtR.W.LewisModified Nesbit procedure for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a comparative outcome analysisJ Urol1581997460463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.N.SulaimanJ.C.GingellNesbit’s procedure for penile curvatureJ Androl15Suppl.199454S56S
   Google Scholar
• C.Van Der HorstF.J.Martinez PortilloC.SeifP.AlkenK.P.JuenemannTreatment of penile curvature with Essed–Schroder tunical plication: aspects of quality of life from the patients’ perspectiveBJU Int932004105108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S.GholamiT.F.LueCorrection of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patientsJ Urol167200220662069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.ChahalN.K.GogoiS.K.SundaramP.M.WestonCorporal plication for penile curvature caused by Peyronie’s disease: the patients’ perspectiveBJU Int872001352356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.ThiounnA.MissirliuM.ZerbibM.LarrouyK.DjeT.Flamet alCorporeal plication for surgical correction of penile curvature. Experience with 60 patientsEur Urol331998401404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.A.LevineE.L.LentingA surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol158199721492152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.A.GeertsenK.E.BrokB.AndersenH.V.NielsenPeyronie curvature treated by plication of the penile fasciaeBr J Urol771996733735
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E.ChungE.ClendinningL.LessardG.BrockFive-year follow-up of Peyronie’s graft surgery: outcomes and patient satisfactionJ Sex Med82011594600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.CormioA.ZucchiF.LorussoO.SelvaggioF.FiorettiM.Porenaet alSurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease by plaque incision and grafting with buccal mucosaEur Urol55200914691475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.KadiogluO.SanliT.AkmanM.CakanB.ErolF.MamadovSurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a single center experience with 145 patientsEur Urol532008432439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S.KalsiN.ChristopherD.J.RalphS.MinhasPlaque incision and fascia lata grafting in the surgical management of Peyronie’s diseaseBJU Int982006110114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.KalsiS.MinhasN.ChristopherD.RalphThe results of plaque incision and venous grafting (Lue procedure) to correct the penile deformity of Peyronie’s diseaseBJU Int95200510291033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.J.ShioshviliA.P.KakonashviliThe surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: replacement of plaque by free autograft of buccal mucosaEur Urol482005129133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A.AdeniyiS.R.GoorneyJ.P.PryorD.J.RalphThe Lue procedure. An analysis of the outcome in Peyronie’s diseaseBJU Int892002404408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.MontorsiA.SaloniaT.MagaL.BuaG.Guazzoniet alEvidence based assessment of long-term results of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol163200017041708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.I.El-SakkaH.M.RashwanT.F.LueVenous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part II outcome analysisJ Urol160199820502053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.J.LembergerM.C.BishopC.P.BatesNesbit’s operation for Peyronie’s diseaseBr J Urol561984721723
   Google Scholar
• E.EssedF.H.SchroederNew surgical treatment for Peyronie diseaseUrology251985582587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.L.TaylorL.A.LevineSurgical correction of Peyronie’s disease via tunica albuginea plication or partial plaque excision with pericardial graft: long-term follow upJ Sex Med5200822212228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M.GreenfieldS.LucasL.A.LevineFactors affecting the loss of length associated with tunica albuginea plication for correction of penile curvatureJ Urol1752006238241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.DaitchK.W.AngermeierD.K.MontagueModified corporoplasty for penile curvature. long-term results and patient satisfactionJ Urol162199920062009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.H.EgydioA.M.LuconS.ArapTreatment of Peyronie’s disease by incomplete circumferential incision of the tunica albuginea and plaque with bovine pericardium graftUrology592002570574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.H.EgydioSurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: choosing the best approach to improve patient satisfactionAsian J Androl102008158166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.KadiogluO.SanliT.AkmanA.ErsayS.GuvenF.MammadovGraft materials in Peyronie’s disease surgery: a comprehensive reviewJ Sex Med42007581595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.E.HortonR.C.SadoveC.J.DevineJr.Peyronie’s diseaseAnn Plas Surg181987122127
   Google Scholar
• E.AustoniF.ColomboF.MantovaniE.PatelliFeniceORadical surgery and conservation of erection in Peyronie’s diseaseArch Ital Urol Androl671995359364
   Google Scholar
• P.D.O’DonnellResults of surgical management of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol148199211841187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.T.HafezC.R.SmithG.A.McLorieA.El-GhoneimiD.B.HerzD.J.Bagliet alTunica vaginalis for correcting penile chordee in a rabbit model: is there a difference in flap versus graft?J Urol166200114291432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C.DeanT.F.LuePeyronie’s disease: advancements in recent surgical techniquesCurr Opin Urol142004339343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.TelokenT.GrazziotinE.RhodenC.Da RosA.FornariF.C.Soareset alPenile straightening with crural graft of the corpus cavernosumJ Urol1642000107108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.U.SchwarzerB.MuhlenO.SchukaiPenile corporoplasty using tunica albuginea free graft from proximal corpus cavernosum. a new technique for treatment of penile curvature in Peyronie’s diseaseEur Urol442003720723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.KargiC.YesilliM.HosnuterB.AkdumanO.BabuccuA.MunganRelaxation incision and fascia lata grafting in the surgical correction of penile curvature in Peyronie’s diseasePlast Reconstr Surg1132004254259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.CraatzK.Spanel-BorowskiJ.F.BegemannR.OlianasM.FischR.HohenfellnerThe dorsal lamina of the rectus sheath: a suitable grafting material for the penile tunica albuginea in Peyronie’s disease?BJU Int972006134137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.F.LueA.I.El-SakkaVenous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part I techniqueJ Urol160199820472049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.J.HellstromS.ReddyApplication of pericardial graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol163200014451447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.A.LevineC.R.EstradaHuman cadaveric pericardial graft for the surgical correction of Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol170200323592362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.SansaloneG.GaraffaR.DjinovicS.PecoraroM.SilvaniG.Barbagliet alLong-term results of the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with Egydio’s technique: a European multicentre studyAsian J Androl132011842845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.D.KnollUse of porcine small intestinal submucosal graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s diseaseUrology572001753757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A.SantucciT.D.BarberResorbable extracellular matrix grafts in urologic reconstructionInt Braz J Urol312005192203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T.JohnG.BandiR.SantucciPorcine small intestinal submucosa is not an ideal graft material for Peyronie’s disease surgeryJ Urol176200610251028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.R.KovacG.B.BrockSurgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after dermal, pericardial, and small intestinal submucosal grafting for Peyronie’s diseaseJ Sex Med4200715001508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K.WilsonM.A.ClevesJ.R.Delk2ndLong-term followup of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesisJ Urol1652001825829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.A.LevineJ.BensonC.HooverInflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: a single-center studyJ Sex Med7201037753783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.L.MorgansternLong-term experience with the AMS 700 CX inflatable penile prosthesis in the treatment of Peyronie’s diseaseTech Urol319978688
   Google Scholar
• F.MontorsiG.GuazzoniL.BarbieriT.MagaP.RigattiA.Graziottinet alAMS 700 CX inflatable penile implants for Peyronie’s disease. functional results, morbidity and patient-partner satisfactionInt J Impot Res819968185
   Google Scholar
• M.F.UstaT.J.BivalacquaJ.SanabriaI.T.KoksalK.MopartyW.J.HellstromPatient and partner satisfaction and long-term results after surgical treatment for Peyronie’s diseaseUrology622003105109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.GaraffaA.MinerviniN.A.ChristopherS.MinhasD.J.RalphThe management of residual curvature after penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s diseaseBJU Int108201111521156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.ChaudharyN.SheikhS.AsterlingI.AhmadD.GreenePeyronie’s disease with erectile dysfunction: penile modeling over inflatable penile prosthesesUrology652005760764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J.DiBlasioJ.M.KurtaS.BottaJ.B.MalcolmJ.Y.WanI.H.Derweeshet alPeyronie’s disease compromises the durability and component-malfunction rates in patients implanted with an inflatable penile prosthesisBJU Int1062010691694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.ChungM.SolomonL.DeyoungG.B.BrockComparison between AMS 700 CX and Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie’s disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfactionJ Sex MedDec 42012 10.1111/jsm.12009
   Google Scholar
• S.H.MandavaE.C.SerefogluM.T.FreierS.K.WilsonW.J.HellstromInfection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysisJ Urol188201218551860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.SansaloneG.GaraffaR.DjinovicP.EgydioG.VespasianiR.Mianoet alSimultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shorteningJ Sex Med92012316321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.RolleC.CerutiM.TimpanoO.SedighP.DestefanisE.Gallettoet alA new, innovative, lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie’s disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal–ventral patch graft: the ‘sliding technique’J Sex Med9201223892395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar