References
- J.S.WolfR.V.ClaymanPercutaneous nephrostolithotomy. What is its role in 1997Urol Clin N Am2419974358
- J.E.LingemanD.NewmanJ.H.MertzP.G.MosbaughR.E.SteeleR.J.Kahnoskiet alExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Indiana experienceJ Urol135199611341137
- J.J.RassweilerC.RennerC.ChaussyS.ThüroffTreatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an updateEur Urol392001187199
- G.PareekN.A.ArmenakasG.PanagopoulosJ.J.BrunoJ.A.FracchiaExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield unitsUrology6520053336
- J.W.ChoiP.H.SongH.T.KimPredictive factors of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stonesKorean J Urol532012424430
- A.N.ArgyropoulosD.A.TolleyOptimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st centuryEur Urol522007344354
- A.R.El-NahasA.M.El-AssmyO.MansourK.Z.SheirA prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomographyEur Urol51200716881694
- N.L.MillerJ.E.LingemanManagement of kidney stonesBMJ3342007468472
- Y.M.TanS.K.YipT.W.ChongM.Y.WongC.ChengK.T.FooClinical experience and results of ESWL treatment for 3,093 urinary calculi with the Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter at the Singapore general hospitalScand J Urol Nephrol362002363367
- S.P.DretlerG.PolykoffCalcium oxalate stone morphology: Fine tuning our therapeutic distinctionsJ Urol1551996828833
- K.C.SawJ.E.LingemanLesson 20. Management of calyceal stonesAUA Update Series201999154159
- G.PittomvilsH.VandeursenM.WeversJ.P.LafautD.De RidderP.De Meesteret alThe influence of internal stone structure upon the fracture behaviour of urinary calculiUltrasound Med Biol201994803810
- S.RamakumarD.E.PattersonA.J.Le RoyC.E.BenderS.B.EricksonD.M.Wilsonet alPrediction of stone composition from plain radiographs: a prospective studyJ Endourol131999397401
- C.G.ChaussyG.J.FuchsCurrent state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyJ Urol1411989782789
- D.BonB.DoreJ.IraniM.MarroncleJ.AubertRadiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. A study of 485 patientsUrology481996556561
- D.E.ZilbermanM.N.FerrandinoG.M.PremingerE.K.PaulsonM.E.LipkinD.T.BollIn vivo determination of urinary stone composition using dual energy computerized tomography with advanced post-acquisition processingJ Urol184201023542359
- P.JosephA.K.MandalS.K.SinghP.MandalS.N.SankhwarS.K.SharmaComputerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyJ Urol167200219681971
- N.P.GuptaM.S.AnsariP.KesarvaniA.KapoorS.MukhopadhyayRole of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for urinary calculiBJU Int95200512851288
- L.J.WangY.C.WongC.K.ChuangS.H.ChuC.S.ChenL.C.Seeet alPrediction of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysisEur Radiol15200522382243