References
- V.PalitD.K.MenebhiI.TaylorM.YoungY.ElmasryT.ShahA unique service in UK delivering Plastibell circumcision. Review of 9 year resultsPediatr Surg Int2320074548
- D.A.ChristakisE.HarveyD.M.ZerrC.FeudtnerJ.A.WrightF.A.ConnellA trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcisionPediatrics1052000246249
- I.A.FraserM.J.AllenP.F.BagshawM.JohnstoneA randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection techniqueBr J Surg681981593595
- Y.L.MakS.C.ChoM.W.FaiChildhood circumcision: conventional dissection or Plastibell device—a prospective randomized trialThe Hong Kong Practitioner171995101105
- J.M.Bastos NettoJ.G.de AraújoJr.M.F.de Almeida NoronhaB.R.PassosJ.de BessaJr.A.A.FigueiredoProspective randomized trial comparing dissection withJ Pediatr Urol62010572577
- S.A.MousaviE.SalehifarCircumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device and conventional dissection surgery: a trial of 586 infants of ages up to 12 monthsAdv Urol6061232008
- J.LazarusA.AlexanderH.RodeCircumcision complications associated with the Plastibell deviceSouth Afr Med J972007192193
- S.M.SörensenM.R.SörensenCircumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-upInt Urol Nephrol201988159166
- T.ShahJ.RaistrickI.TaylorM.YoungD.MenebhiR.StevensA circumcision service for religious reasonsBJU Int831999807809
- K.P.ManjiCircumcision of the young infant in a developing country using the PlastibellAnn Trop Paediatr202000101104
- J.R.HolmanE.L.LewisR.L.RinglerNeonatal circumcision techniquesAm Fam Physician521995519520