Advanced search
Publication Cover
Arab Journal of Urology
An International Journal
Volume 13, 2015 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
458
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Stones/Endourology

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20–30 mm single renal pelvic stoneFootnote

Mohammed HassanUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ahmed R. El-NahasUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Khaled Z. SheirUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Nasr A. El-TabeyUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ahmed M. El-AssmyUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ahmed M. ElshalUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
&
Ahmed A. ShokeirUrology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
 show all
Pages 212-216 | Received 07 Mar 2015, Accepted 30 Apr 2015, Published online: 05 Apr 2019

References

  • J.AntonelliM.S.PearleAdvances in percutaneous nephrolithotomyUrol Clin North Am40201399113
  • Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al., Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2014. Uroweb available at: <http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/22%20Urolithiasis_LR.pdf> [accessed 02.03.14].
  • J.D.WiesenthalD.GhiculeteR.J.D’A HoneyK.T.PaceA comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?J Endourol252011481485
  • A.El-AssmyA.R.El-NahasM.E.Abo-ElgharI.ErakyM.R.El-KenawyK.Z.SheirPredictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20 and 30 mm: a multivariate analysis modelSci World J6200623882395
  • O.M.AboumarzoukM.MongaS.G.KataO.TraxerB.K.SomaniFlexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysisJ Endourol26201212571263
  • D.DindoN.DemartinesP.A.ClavienClassification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of a 6336 patients and results of a surveyAnn Surg2402004205213
  • A.R.El-NahasA.M.El-AssmyO.MansourK.Z.SheirA prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomographyEur Urol51200716881693
  • A.N.ArgyropoulosD.A.TolleyEvaluation of outcome following lithotripsyCurr Opin Urol202010154158
  • A.M.El-AssmyA.A.ShokeirA.R.El-NahasA.M.ShomaI.ErakyM.R.El-Kenawyet alOutcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Effect of body mass indexEur Urol522007199204
  • B.W.TurneyJ.M.ReynardJ.G.NobleS.R.KeoghaneTrends in urological stone diseaseBJU Int109201210821087
  • B.R.MatlagaJ.P.JansenL.M.MeckleyT.W.ByrneJ.E.LingemanEconomic outcomes of treatment for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic literature reviewJ Urol1882012449454
  • Y.LotanM.S.PearleEconomics of stone managementUrol Clin North Am342007443453
  • J.D.WiesenthalD.GhiculeteA.A.RayR.J.HoneyK.T.PaceA clinical nomogram to predict the successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculiJ Urol1862011556562
  • K.MadboulyA.M.El-TiraifiM.SeidaS.R.El-FaqihR.AtassiR.F.TalicSlow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized studyJ Urol1732005127130
  • D.DemirciM.SofikerimE.YalcinO.EkmekçiogluI.GülmezM.KaracagilComparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculiJ Endourol21200714071410
  • B.A.ConnorsA.P.EvanP.M.BlomgrenR.K.HandaL.R.WillisS.GaoEffect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy induced lesion size during step-wise voltage rampingBJU Int1032009104107
  • G.ZengZ.ZhaoS.WanZ.MaiW.WuW.Zhonget alMinimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 casesJ Endourol27201312031208
  • M.DesaiS.Mishra‘Microperc’ micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evidence to practiceCurr Opin Urol222012134138
  • J.WangC.ZhaoC.ZhangX.FanY.LinQ.JiangTubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysisBJU Int1092012918924

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.