Farmers’ use of fundamental knowledge to re-design their cropping systems: situated contextualisation processes

References

• M.DuruO.TherondG.MartinR.Martin-ClouaireM.-A.MagneE.JustesE.-P.JournetJ.-N.AubertotS.SavaryJ.-E.BergezJ.P.SarthouHow to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a reviewAgron. Sustain. Dev.3520151259128110.1007/s13593-015-0306-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.BiggsM.SchlüterD.BiggsE.L.BohenskyS.BurnSilverG.CundillV.DakosT.M.DawL.S.EvansK.KotschyA.M.LeitchC.MeekA.QuinlanC.Raudsepp-HearneM.D.RobardsM.L.SchoonL.SchultzP.C.WestToward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem servicesAnnu. Rev. Environ. Resour.37201242144810.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A.AltieriThe ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems, AgricultureEcosyst. Environment.741999193110.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.IngramAre farmers in England equipped to meet the knowledge challenge of sustainable soil management? An analysis of farmer and advisor viewsJ. Environ. Manage.86200821422810.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.G.RölingJ.L.S.JigginsPolicy paradigm for sustainable farmingEur. J. Agric. Educ. Ext.11994234310.1080/13892249485300041
   Google Scholar
• J.ClarkJ.MurdochLocal knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: a reflection on three case studiesSoc. Ruralis371997386010.1111/1467-9523.00035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.Dor&#x00E9D.MakowskiE.MalézieuxN.Munier-JolainM.TchamitchianP.TittonellFacing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: revisiting methods, concepts and knowledgeEur. J. Agron.34201119721010.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.MalézieuxDesigning cropping systems from natureAgron. Sustain. Dev.322012152910.1007/s13593-011-0027-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.H.WalkerP.J.ThorneF.L.SinclairB.ThapaC.D.WoodD.B.SubbaA systems approach to comparing indigenous and scientific knowledge: consistency and discriminatory power of indigenous and laboratory assessment of the nutritive value of tree fodderAgric. Syst.6219998710310.1016/S0308-521X(99)00058-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A.AltieriV.M.ToledoNatural resource management among small-scale farmers in semi-arid lands: building on traditional knowledge and agroecologyAnn. Arid Zone442005365
   Google Scholar
• T.BaarsExperiential science; towards an integration of implicit and reflected practitioner-expert knowledge in the scientific development of organic farmingJ. Agric. Environ. Ethics24201160162810.1007/s10806-010-9281-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.FazeyJ.A.FazeyJ.G.SalisburyD.B.LindenmayerS.DoversThe nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservationEnviron. Conserv.332006110.1017/S037689290600275X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.ChikowoV.FaloyaS.PetitN.M.Munier-JolainIntegrated Weed Management systems allow reduced reliance on herbicides and long-term weed controlAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.132200923724210.1016/j.agee.2009.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.DeytieuxT.NemecekR.Freiermuth KnuchelG.GaillardN.M.Munier-JolainIs Integrated Weed Management efficient for reducing environmental impacts of cropping systems? A case study based on life cycle assessmentEur. J. Agron.362012556510.1016/j.eja.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.CoquilJ.-L.FiorelliA.BlouetC.MignoletExperiencing organic mixed crop dairy systems: a step-by-Step design centred on a long-term experimentS.BellonS.PenvernOrganic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures2014SpringerNetherlands201217(accessed April 26 2015)http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-7927-3_11
   Google Scholar
• R.L.McCownG.L.HammerJ.N.G.HargreavesD.P.HolzworthD.M.FreebairnAPSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems researchAgric. Syst.50199625527110.1016/0308-521X(94)00055-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.A.H.RossingJ.M.MeynardM.K.Van IttersumModel-based explorations to support development of sustainable farming systems: case studies from France and the NetherlandsDev. Crop Sci.251997339351
   Google Scholar
• F.AffholderD.JourdainD.D.QuangT.P.TuongM.MorizeA.RicomeConstraints to farmers’ adoption of direct-seeding mulch-based cropping systems: a farm scale modeling approach applied to the mountainous slopes of VietnamAgric. Syst.1032010516210.1016/j.agsy.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.KollasK.C.KersebaumC.NendelK.ManevskiC.MüllerT.PalosuoC.M.Armas-HerreraN.BeaudoinM.BindiM.CharfeddineT.ConradtJ.ConstantinJ.EitzingerF.EwertR.FerriseT.GaiserI.G.de Cortazar-AtauriL.GiglioP.HlavinkaH.HoffmannM.P.HoffmannM.LaunayR.ManderscheidB.MaryW.MirschelM.MoriondoJ.E.OlesenI.ÖztürkA.PacholskiD.Ripoche-WachterP.P.RoggeroS.RoncossekR.P.RötterF.RugetB.SharifM.TrnkaD.VentrellaK.WahaM.WegehenkelH.-J.WeigelL.WuCrop rotation modelling—A European model intercomparisonEur. J. Agron.7020159811110.1016/j.eja.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.ConstantinC.Le BasE.JustesLarge-scale assessment of optimal emergence and destruction dates for cover crops to reduce nitrate leaching in temperate conditions using the STICS soil-crop modelEur. J. Agron.692015758710.1016/j.eja.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.ColbachA.CollardS.H.M.GuyotD.MézièreN.Munier-JolainAssessing innovative sowing patterns for integrated weed management with a 3D crop:weed competition modelEur. J. Agron.532014748910.1016/j.eja.2013.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.ConstantinN.BeaudoinM.LaunayJ.DuvalB.MaryLong-term nitrogen dynamics in various catch crop scenarios: test and simulations with STICS model in a temperate climateAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.1472012364610.1016/j.agee.2011.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.SterkC.LeeuwisM.K.van IttersumLand use models in complex societal problem solving: plug and play or networking?Environ. Modell. Software24200916517210.1016/j.envsoft.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.HochmanJ.CouttsP.S.CarberryR.L.MccownThe FARMSCAPE Experience: Simulations Aid Participative Learning in Risky Farming Systems in Australia2000(accessed September 23, 2015)http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN%26cpsidt=1007902
   Google Scholar
• L.ProstM.CerfM.-H.JeuffroyLack of consideration for end-users during the design of agronomic models. A reviewAgron. Sustain. Dev.32201258159410.1007/s13593-011-0059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.S.ReedL.C.StringerI.FazeyA.C.EvelyJ.H.J.KruijsenFive principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental managementJ. Environ. Manage.146201433734510.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.FarringtonA.M.MartinFarmer participatory research: a review of concepts and recent fieldworkAgricu. Adm. Ext.29198824726410.1016/0269-7475(88)90107-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.IngramP.FryA.MathieuRevealing different understandings of soil held by scientists and farmers in the context of soil protection and managementLand Use Policy272010516010.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.JordanJ.WhiteR.GunsolusLearning groups developing collaborative learning methods for diversified, site-specific weed management: a case study from Minnesota, USACow up a Tree: Knowing and Learning for Change in AgricultureINRA Paris(2000) 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• J.M.MeynardB.DedieuA.P.(Bram) BosRe-design and co-design of farming systems. An overview of methods and practices,)D.DarnhoferFarming Systems Research into the 21 st Century2012The New Dynamic, SpringerNetherlands40542910.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_18(accessed June 17 2013)
   Google Scholar
• A.WezelM.CasagrandeF.CeletteJ.-F.VianA.FerrerJ.Peign&#x00E9Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A reviewAgron. Sustain. Dev.34201412010.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Meynard, System experiments: methodological progress, Montpellier, France, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A.DavidEtude de cas et généralisation scientifique en sciences de gestion2003(accessed November 10, 2015)http://basepub.dauphine.fr/xmlui/handle/123456789/1444
   Google Scholar
• B.G.GlaserA.L.StraussThe Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research2009Transaction Publishers
   Google Scholar
• P.MischlerS.LheureuxF.DumoulinP.MenuO.SeneJ.-P.HopquinM.CariolleR.ReauN.MunierjolainV.FaloyaHuit fermes de grande culture engagées en production intégrée réduisent les pesticides sans baisse de margeLe Courrier de L Environnement de lINRA.5720097391
   Google Scholar
• R. Amalberti, Modèles d’activité en conduite de processus rapides: implications pour l’assistance à la conduite, Paris 8, 1992. http://www.theses.fr/1992PA080718 (accessed November 10, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• M.CerfLES CONNAISSANCES MOBILISÉES PAR DES AGRICULTEURS POUR LA CONCEPTION ET LA MISE EN OEUVRE DE DISPOSITIFS D’INTERVENTION CULTURALELe Travail Humain.591996305333
   Google Scholar
• J. Dewey, Logique. La théorie de l’enquête, Paris, PUF. (1993).
   Google Scholar
• P.MayenDéveloppement professionnel et formation: une théorie didactique, Université Pierre Mendes FranceGrenoble: Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches2001
   Google Scholar
• J.LaveCognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life1988Cambridge University Press(accessed October 31, 2016)http://https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr%26lr=%26id=n6eiH3iPVKYC%26oi=fnd%26pg=PR10%26dq=arena+settings+authornbsp:lave%26ots=cbN7c8Jsoh%26sig=aCuxBrpC8qepHNkxGI7i_LplHJw
   Google Scholar
• R.E.StakeCase study: composition and performanceBull. Council Res. Music Educ.19943144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ø.PålshaugenHow to do things with words: towards a linguistic turn in action research?Concepts Transform.9200418120310.1075/cat.9.2.07pal
   Google Scholar
• J.BrunerPlay, thought, and languagePeabody J. Educ.6019836069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A.SchönThe Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action1983Basic books(accessed November 17, 2015)http://https://books.google.fr/books?hl=fr%26lr=%26id=ceJIWay4-jgC%26oi=fnd%26pg=PR7%26dq=authornbsp:schon%26ots=q74US-CSvj%26sig=fuvMAYnmWlryXm2Hj6rpceXI4xA
   Google Scholar
• D.H.WalkerF.L.SinclairAcquiring qualitative knowledge about complex agroecosystems Part 2: Formal representationAgric. Syst.56199836538610.1016/S0308-521X(97)00049-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.MormontDes Savoirs Actionnables2007(accessed December 14, 2014)http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/22372
   Google Scholar
• J.BriggsIndigenous knowledge: a false dawn for development theory and practice?Prog. Dev. Stud.132013231243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S.BrownA.CollinsP.DuguidSituated cognition and the culture of learningEduc. Res.1819893242
   Google Scholar
• M.RileyExperts in their fields: farmer −expert knowledges and environmentally friendly farming practicesEnviron. Plann. A0200910.1068/a39253(0-0)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.DelbosO.DavidA.MinasM.CerfC.FalgasC.A.GagneurJ.D.GiletV.LaudinotA.SigwaltE.WaldemeirConseil agronomique et réduction des pesticides: quelles ressources pour affronter ce nouveau challenge professionnel?Innov. Agronomiques.2014367378
   Google Scholar
• M.CerfB.OmonE.ChantreM.-N.GuillotM.Le BailC.LamineP.OlryVers des systèmes économes en intrants: quelles trajectoires et quel accompagnement pour les producteurs en grandes cultures?Innov. Agronomiques2010105119
   Google Scholar