Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia

References

• N. Amara , M. Ouimet , R. Landry . New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies. Science Communication. 26(1): 2004; 75–106.
   Google Scholar
• L. Bernier , M. Howlett . The policy analytical capacity of the Government of Quebec. Canadian Political Science Review. 6(2–3): 2012; 281–285.
   Google Scholar
• O. Belkhodja . Toward a revisited organizational and social perspective of knowledge utilization: Contributions from organizational theory. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management. 11(3): 2012; 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• H. Bochel , S. Duncan . Making policy in theory and practice. 2007; Policy Press: Bristol
   Google Scholar
• K. Bogenschneider , T.J. Corbett . Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. 2010; Routledge: London
   Google Scholar
• A. Cherney , B.W. Head , P. Boreham , J. Povey , M. Ferguson . Perspectives of academic social scientists on knowledge transfer and research collaborations: A cross sectional survey of Australian academics. Evidence and Policy. 8(4): 2012; 433–453.
   Google Scholar
• A. Cherney , B.W. Head , P. Boreham , J. Povey , M. Ferguson . Use of academic social research by public officials: Exploring preferences and constraints that impact on research use. Working paper. 2014; University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• H.K. Colebatch , B.A. Radin . Mapping the work of policy. H.K. Colebatch . The work of policy: An international survey. 2006; Rowman & Littlefield: New York 217–226.
   Google Scholar
• J. Craft , M. Howlett . The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice. Policy and Society. 32(3): 2013; 187–197.
   Google Scholar
• L. Dobuzinskis , M. Howlett , D. Laycock . Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art. 2007; University of Toronto Press: Toronto
   Google Scholar
• J.L. Hall , E.T. Jennings . Assessing the use and weight of information and evidence in U.S. state policy decisions. Policy and Society. 29(2): 2010; 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• G. Harvey , P. Jas , K. Walshe , C. Skelcher . Absorptive capacity: How organizations assimilate and apply knowledge to improve performance. K. Walshe , G. Harvey , P. Jas . Connecting knowledge and performance in public services: From knowing to doing. 2010; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 226–250.
   Google Scholar
• B.W. Head . Three lenses of evidence based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 67(1): 2008; 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• B.W. Head . Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society. 29(2): 2010; 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• B.W. Head . How do government agencies use evidence? Report for the Board of Health and Welfare. 2013; Swedish National Board of Health & Welfare: Stockholm
   Google Scholar
• M. Howlett . Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration. 52(2): 2009; 153–175.
   Google Scholar
• M. Howlett , J. Newman . Policy analysis and policy work in federal systems: Policy advice and its contribution to evidence-based policy-making in multi-level governance systems. Policy and Society. 29(2): 2010; 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• M. Howlett , A. Wellstead . Policy analysts in the bureaucracy revisited: The nature of professional policy work in contemporary government. Politics and Policy. 49(4): 2011; 613–633.
   Google Scholar
• E.T. Jennings , J.L. Hall . Evidence-based practice and the use of information in state agency decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 22(2): 2012; 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• R. Landry , N. Amara , M. Lamari . Utilization of social science research in Canada. Research Policy. 30(2): 2001; 333–349.
   Google Scholar
• R. Landry , M. Lamari , N. Amara . The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review. 63(2): 2003; 192–205.
   Google Scholar
• J.N. Lavis , D. Robertson , J. Woodside , C. McLeod , J. Abelson . How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?. Milbank Quarterly. 81(2): 2003; 221–248.
   Google Scholar
• L. Meagher , C. Lyall , S. Nutley . Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: A method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation. 17(3): 2008; 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• S. Nutley , I. Walter , H. Davies . Using evidence: How research can inform public services. 2007; Policy Press: Bristol
   Google Scholar
• M. Ouimet , P.-O. Bédard , J. Turgeon , J.N. Lavis , F. Gelineau , F. Gagnon . Correlates of consulting research evidence among policy analysts in government ministries: A cross-sectional survey. Evidence and Policy. 6(4): 2010; 433–460.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ouimet , R. Landry , S. Ziam , P.O. Bedard . The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants. Evidence and Policy. 5(4): 2009; 331–350.
   Google Scholar
• E.C. Page , B. Jenkins . Policy bureaucracy: Governing with a cast of thousands. 2005; Oxford University Press: Oxford
   Google Scholar
• B.A. Radin . Beyond Machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age. 2000; Georgetown University Press: Washington
   Google Scholar
• N. Shulock . The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 18(2): 1999; 226–244.
   Google Scholar
• A. Vesely . Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence. Policy and Society. 32(3): 2013; 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Weiss . The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review. 39(5): 1979; 426–431.
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Weiss . Policy research: Data, ideas, or arguments?. P. Wagner , C.H. Weiss , B. Wittrock , H. Wollmann . Social sciences and modern states: National experiences and theoretical crossroads. 1991; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 307–332.
   Google Scholar