The politics and consequences of performance measurement

References

• M.A. Abernethy , W.F. Chua . A field study of control systems ‘redesign’: The impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research. 13 1996; 569–606.
   Google Scholar
• S. Beer . Decision and control: The meaning of operational research and management cybernetics. 1966; Wiley: Chichester
   Google Scholar
• R. Behn . Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review. 63(5): 2003; 586–606.
   Google Scholar
• A.M. Bertelli , P. John . Performance measurement as a political discipline mechanism. University of Southern California Law School, Law and Economics Working Paper Series No. 112. 2010; Berkeley Electronic Press. http://law.bepress.com/usclwps-lewps/art112 .
   Google Scholar
• G. Bevan , C. Hood . What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration. 84(3): 2006; 517–538.
   Google Scholar
• S. Brignall , S. Modell . An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Review. 11 2000; 281–306.
   Google Scholar
• N. Carter . Performance indicators: ‘Backseat driving’ or ‘hands off’ control?. Policy and Politics. 17(2): 1989; 131–138.
   Google Scholar
• N. Carter , R. Klein , P. Day . How organisations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. 1992; Routledge: London and New York
   Google Scholar
• B. Damgaard , J.M. Lewis . Accountability and citizen participation. M. Bovens , R. Goodin , T. Schillemans . Oxford handbook of public accountability. 2014; Oxford University Press: Oxford 258–272.
   Google Scholar
• D. Easton . A systems analysis of political life. 1965; Wiley: New York
   Google Scholar
• G.A. Fine . The chaining of social problems: Solutions and unintended consequences in the age of betrayal. Social Problems. 53(1): 2006; 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• J. Gao . Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China. Public Administration and Development. 29 2009; 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• G.A. Grizzle . Performance measurement and dysfunction: The dark side of quantifying work. Public Performance & Management Review. 25(4): 2002; 363–369.
   Google Scholar
• A. Halchmi . Performance measurement: Test the water before you dive in. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 71(2): 2005; 255–266.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hood . A public management for all seasons. Public Administration. 69(1): 1991; 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hood , H. Margetts , P. 6 . The drive to modernize. A world of surprises?. H. Margetts , P. 6 , C. Hood . Paradoxes of modernization. Unintended consequences of public policy reform. 2010; Oxford University Press: Oxford 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hood , G. Peters . The middle aging of New Public Management: Into the age of paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 14(3): 2004; 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• P.M. Jackson . Governance by numbers: What have we learned over the past 30 years?. Public Money & Management. 31(1): 2011; 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Å. Johnsen . What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management?. Public Money and Management. 25(1): 2005; 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• R.M. Kanter , D.V. Summers . “Doing well while doing good”: Dilemmas of performance measurement in non-profit organizations and the need for a multiple-constituency approach. W.W. Powell . The non-profit sector: A research handbook. 1987; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT 98–110.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kerr . An academy classic: On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive. 9(1): 1995; 7–14. first published in 1975.
   Google Scholar
• H. Laswell . Politics: Who gets what, when, how. 1936; McGraw-Hill: New York
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Lerner , P.E. Tetlock . Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin. 125(2): 1999; 255–275.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Lewis . Evidence based policy: A technocratic wish in a political world. V. Lin , B. Gibson . Evidence-based health policy: Problems and possibilities. 2003; Oxford University Press: Melbourne 250–259.
   Google Scholar
• T. Lowe . New development: The paradox of outcomes — the more we measure, the less we understand. Public Money and Management. 33(3): 2013; 213–216.
   Google Scholar
• S. Lukes . Power. A radical view. 2nd ed., 2005; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke
   Google Scholar
• J. McKenzie . Perform or else: From discipline to performance. 2001; Routledge: London
   Google Scholar
• R.K. Merton . The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review. 1 1936; 894–904.
   Google Scholar
• J.W. Meyer , B. Rowan . Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology. 83 1977; 340–363.
   Google Scholar
• T.M. Moe . The politics of structural choice: Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. O. Williamson . Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond. 1990; Oxford University Press: New York 116–153.
   Google Scholar
• T.M. Moe . Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 6(Special Issue): 1990; 213–253.
   Google Scholar
• D.P. Moynihan . The dynamics of performance measurement. 2008; Georgetown: Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• C. Pollitt . The politics of performance assessment: Lessons for higher education?. Studies in Higher Education. 12(1): 1987; 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• C. Pollitt . Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 16(1): 2006; 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• C. Pollitt , G. Bouckaert . Public management reform. 3rd ed., 2011; Oxford University Press: Oxford
   Google Scholar
• B.A. Radin . Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. 2006; Georgetown University Press: Washington
   Google Scholar
• V.F. Ridgway . Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurements. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1(2): 1956; 240–247.
   Google Scholar
• A. Schick . Getting performance measures to measure up. D.W. Forsythe . Quicker, better, cheaper: Managing performance in American Government. 2001; Rockefeller Institute Press: Albany, NY
   Google Scholar
• S. Sieber . Fatal remedies. 1981; Plenum: New York
   Google Scholar
• P. Smith . On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration. 18(2–3): 1995; 277–310.
   Google Scholar
• C. Tilly . Invisible elbow. Sociological Forum. 11(4): 1996; 589–601.
   Google Scholar
• W. Van Dooren , G. Bouckaert , J. Halligan . Performance management in the public sector. 2010; Routledge: Oxon
   Google Scholar
• S. Van Thiel , F.L. Leeuw . The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review. 25(3): 2002; 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Weiss . Ideology, interests and information: The basis of policy positions. D. Callahan , B. Jennings . Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis. 1983; Plenum Press: New York
   Google Scholar