Watchdogs or guard dogs: Do anti-corruption agencies need strong teeth?

References

• B. Anderson . Guard dog vs. watchdog. 2011 http://www.bradanderson.org/blog/2011/07/guard-dog-vs-watchdog/ Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bolongaita . An exception to the rule? Why Indonesia's anti-corruption commission succeeds where others don’t—A comparison with the Philippines’ Ombudsman. 2010. U4.
   Google Scholar
• A. Doig , D. Watt , R. Williams . Why do developing country anti-corruption commissions fail to deal with corruption? Understanding the three dilemmas of organizational development, performance expectation, and donor and government cycles. Public Administration and Development. 27 2007; 251–259.
   Google Scholar
• A. Doig , D. Watt , R. Williams . Measuring ‘success’ in five African anti-corruption commissions. 2005. U4.
   Google Scholar
• D. Feldman , D. Eichenthal . The art of the watchdog. 2013; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY
   Google Scholar
• W. Ginsberg . Offices of inspectors general and law enforcement authority: In brief. Congressional Research Service. 2014 http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462481/ Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• A. Graycar . Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society. 34 2015; 2.
   Google Scholar
• A. Graycar , T. Prenzler . Understanding and preventing corruption. 2013; Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• H. Hechler , B. Parkes . Annual review of DFID/RNE Malawi's Anticorruption Bureau Support Programme. 2010; Norad Collected Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• J. Heilbrunn . Anti-corruption commissions: Panacea or real medicine to fight corruption?. 2004; World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• D. Hough . Corruption anti-corruption, and governance. 2013; Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• D. Iyer . Earning a reputation for independence: Ghana's Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice, 1993–2003. 2011; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/earning-reputation-independence-ghanas-commission-human-rights-and-administrative Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kempf . Accountability remade: The diffusion and reinvention of offices of Inspectors General. (unpublished thesis) 2014; University of Kansas School of Public Affairs and Administration.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kempf . Crafting accountability policy: Designing offices of Inspector General. Policy and Society. 34 2015; 2.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kpundeh . Process interventions versus structural reforms: Institutionalizing anticorruption reforms in Africa. Building State Capacity in Africa: New Approaches, Emerging Lessons. 2004; 257–282.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . ‘Inviting a tiger into your home’: Indonesia creates an anti-corruption commission with teeth: 2002–2007. 2012; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/inviting-tiger-your-home-indonesia-creates-anti-corruption-commission-teeth-2002-2007 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . Holding the high ground with public support: Indonesia's anti-corruption commission digs in, 2007–2011. 2012; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/holding-high-ground-public-support-indonesias-anti-corruption-commission-digs-2007-2011 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . Surmounting state capture: Latvia's anti-corruption agency spurs reforms, 2002–2011. 2012; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/surmounting-state-capture-latvias-anti-corruption-agency-spurs-reforms-2002-2011 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . Balancing responsibilities: Evolution of Lithuania's anti-corruption agency, 1997–2007. Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. 2012 http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/balancing-responsibilities-evolution-lithuanias-anti-corruption-agency-1997-2007 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . Cleaning house: Croatia mops up high-level corruption, 2005–2012. 2013; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/cleaning-house-croatia-mops-high-level-corruption-2005-2012 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . Toothless but forceful: Slovenia's anti-corruption watchdog exposes systemic graft, 2004–2013. 2013; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/toothless-forceful-slovenias-anti-corruption-watchdog-exposes-systemic-graft-2004-2013 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . From a rocky start to regional leadership: Mauritius's anti-corruption agency, 2006–2012. 2013; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/rocky-start-regional-leadership-mauritiuss-anti-corruption-agency-2006-2012 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . Managing corruption risks: Botswana builds an anti-graft agency, 1994–2012. 2013; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/managing-corruption-risks-botswana-builds-anti-graft-agency-1994-2012 Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• G. Kuris . From underdogs to watchdogs: How anti-corruption agencies can hold off potent adversaries. 2014; Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/underdogs-watchdogs-how-anti-corruption-agencies-can-hold-potent-adversaries Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• P. Meagher . Anti-corruption agencies: Rhetoric versus reality. Journal of Policy Reform. 8 2004; 69–103.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . Specialised anti-corruption institutions: Review of models. 2nd ed., 2013. http://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/specialisedanti-corruptioninstitutions-reviewofmodels.htm Accessed 16.02.15.
   Google Scholar
• M. Peters . The department of investigation's citytime investigation: Lessons learned & recommendations to improve New York City's management of large information technology contracts. 2014; New York City Department of Investigation. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doi/downloads/pdf/2014/July-2014/pr13citytime_72514.pdf
   Google Scholar
• J. Pope , F. Vogl . Making anticorruption agencies more effective. Finance & Development. 37(June): 2000; 2. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2000/06/pope.htm
   Google Scholar
• T. Prenzler . The evolution of police oversight in Australia. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy. 21 2011; 3.
   Google Scholar
• J. Quah . Benchmarking for excellence: A comparative analysis of seven Asian anti-corruption agencies. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 31(2): 2009, December
   Google Scholar
• J. Quah . Defying institutional failure: Learning from the experiences of anti-corruption agencies in four Asian countries. Crime Law and Social Change. 53 2010; 23–54.
   Google Scholar
• F. Recanatini . Anti-corruption authorities: An effective tool to curb corruption?. S. Rose-Ackerman , T. Søreide . International handbook on the economics of corruption, Volume Two. 2011; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, England
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Royal Commission of Enquiry into the Death of Teoh Beng Hock. 2011, June 22; Presented to Seri Paduka Baginda Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• P. Salkin , Z. Kansler . Ensuring public trust at the municipal level: Inspectors general enter the mix. Albany Law Review. 75 2011; 1.
   Google Scholar
• S. Schütte . Against the odds: Anti-corruption reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development. 32 2012; 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• L. De Sousa . Anti-corruption agencies: Between empowerment and irrelevance. Crime, Law and Social Change. 53.1 2010; 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• B. de Speville . Overcoming corruption: The essentials. 2010; De Speville & Associates: Surrey, England
   Google Scholar