References
- World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 326(8452): 1985; 436–437. 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92750-3.
- J. Zeitlin, A. Mohangoo. European Perinatal Health Report. http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR/european-perinatal-health-report.pdf. 2008
- Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights. Records of the General Conference of UNESCO; Oct 3-21. 2005; UNESCO: Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001428/142825E.pdf.
- Birthrights. Protecting human rights in childbirth [Internet]. Available at: http://www.birthrights.org.uk/
- United States Supreme Court. Union Pacific Railway Co. versus Botsford, 141, U.S. 250. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/141/250/case.html. 1891
- Department of Health: Great Britain. Changing childbirth: Report of the expert Maternity Group. 1993; H. M. Stationery Office: London.
- M. Dixon-Woods, S.J. Williams, C.J. Jackson. Why do women consent to surgery, even when they do not want to? An interactionist and Bourdieusian analysis. Social Science & Medicine. 62(11): 2006; 2742–2753. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.006.
- T. Morris. Cut it out: The C-section epidemic in America. 2013; New York University Press: New York.
- O. Olsen, J.A. Clausen. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012; 10.1002/14651858.CD000352.pub2.
- G. Carroli, L. Mignini. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.
- J. Zeitlin, A. Mohangoo, M. Delnord. European Perinatal Health Report. Health and Care for Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2010. http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR2010_w_disclaimer.pdf. 2013
- F. Althabe, C. Sosa, J.M. Belizán. Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological Study. Birth. 33(4): 2006; 270–277. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00118.x.
- E. Solana-Arellano, A. Villegas-Arrizón, J. Legorreta-Soberanis. Dispareunia en mujeres después del parto: estudio de casos y controles en un Hospital de Acapulco, México. Pam American Journal of Public Health. 23(1): 2008; 44–51. 10.1590/S1020-49892008000100006.
- World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. 2015; WHO: Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?ua=1.
- OECD. Health at a glance 2015. OECD indicators. 2015; OECD. http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm.
- UNICEF. Informe anual. 2012; UNICEF: New York. http://www.unicef.org/spanish/publications/files/UNICEF-AnnualReport2012_SP_9_July.pdf.
- OECD. Health at a glance. Europe 2014, 2014. OECD http://ec.europa.eu/health/reports/european/health_glance_2014_en.htm.
- M. Sadler, G. Leiva. Cesáreas en Chile (I): AEs efectivo que las mujeres chilenas prefieren la cesárea al parto vaginal? CIPER. Centro de Investigación Periodística [Internet]. 2015 March 13. Available from: http://ciperchile.cl/2015/03/13/cesareas-en-chile-i-es-efectivo-que-las-mujeres-chilenas-prefieren-la-cesarea-al-parto-vaginal/
- M. Sadler, G. Leiva. Cesáreas en Chile (V): El negocio del nacimiento. CIPER. Centro de Investigación Periodística [Internet]. 2015 Julio 27. Available from: http://ciperchile.cl/2015/07/27/cesareas-en-chile-v-el-negocio-del-nacimiento/
- Anonymous Caesar’s Legion. The Economist [Internet]. 15/08/2015. Available from: http://www.economist.com/news/international/21660974-global-rise-caesarean-sections-being-driven-not-medical-necessity
- A. Mazzoni, F. Althabe, N. Liu. Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG. 118(4): 2011; 391–399. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x.
- D. Bowser, K. Hill. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth. Report of a Landscape Analysis. 2010; Harvard School of Public Health University Research Co.: Harvard. http://www.tractionproject.org/sites/default/files/Respectful_Care_at_Birth_9-20-101_Final.pdf.
- L.P. Freedman, K. Ramsey, T. Abuya. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agenda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 92(12): 2014 Dec 1; 915–917. 10.2471/BLT.14.137869.
- World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. 2014. Geneva, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/134588/1/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf?ua=1.
- M. Bohren, J. Vogel, E. Hunter. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Medicine. 12(6): 2015; 1–32. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
- R. Jewkes, L. Penn-Kekana. Mistreatment of Women in Childbirth: Time for Action on This Important Dimension of Violence against Women. PLoS Medicine. 12(6): 2015; e1001849. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849.
- C. Purandare, R. Adane. The unfinished agenda of women’s reproductive health. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 131(Sup. 1): 2015; S1–S2. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.025.
- J. Blundell. Lectures on the theory and practice of midwifery. Lancet. 9(222): 1827 12/1; 329–335. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)75285-3.
- S.G. Diniz, H. de Oliveira Salgado, H. de Aguiar Andrezzo. Abuse and disrespect in childbirth care as a public health issue in Brazil: Origins, definitions, impacts on maternal health, and proposals for its prevention. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 25(3): 2015; 377–384. 10.7322/jhgd.106080.
- G. Vera López. Relacahupan-10 años de trabajos, desafíos y logros. Tempus Actas Saúde Coletiva. 4(4): 2010; 233–236. http://www.tempusactas.unb.br/index.php/tempus/article/viewFile/852/815.
- República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Ley Orgánica sobre el derecho de las mujeres a una vida libre de violencia. 2007 Sept; GORBV. 1738.668, http://virtual.urbe.edu/gacetas/38770.pdf.
- Senado y Cámara de Diputados de la Nación Argentina. Ley de protección integral a las mujeres. 2010 Jul 20; BORA. http://www.cnm.gov.ar/Noticias/BoletinOficial20_07_2010.pdf.
- Grupo de Información en Reproducción Asistida. Mujeres y niñas sin justicia. Derechos Reproductivos en México. México A C. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8jIzTd6J_gVTHEwX1kwaDFvRGc/view. 2015
- Red Internacional de Observatorios de Violencia Obstétrica. Declaración conjunta. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-ucL20WyuYRZXFOQ18xWGd4d1U/view. 2016 March 8
- S. Bellón Sánchez. Obstetric violence: Medicalization, authority and sexism within Spanish obstetric assistance. A new name for old issues [master’s thesis]. 2014; Utrecht University: Utrecht. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/298064.
- J. Donnison. Midwives and medical men. A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth. 1988; Heinemman: London.
- D. Ruiz-Berdún. La enseñanza de la obstetricia en el Real Colegio de Cirugía de San Carlos: la cátedra de partos. Medical History. 1: 2014; 22–35. http://www.fu1838.org/pdf/2014-1b.pdf.
- S. Cohen Shabot. Making Loud Bodies “Feminine”: A Feminist-Phenomenological Analysis of Obstetric Violence. Human Studies. 2015; 1–17. 10.1007/s10746-015-9369-x.
- A. Gaines, R. Hahn. Among the Physicians: Encounter, Exchange and Transformation. R. Hahn, A. Gaines. Physicians of Western Medicine: Anthropological Approaches to Theory and Practice. 1984; Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, 3–22.
- S. Montesanti, W. Thurston. Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: implications for public health interventions and policy. BMC Womens Health. 15(1): 2015 Nov 11; 100. 10.1186/s12905-015-0256-4.
- R. Castro. Génesis y práctica del habitus médico autoritario en México. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 76(2): 2014; 167–197. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0188-25032014000200001&script=sci_arttext.
- G. Carapinheiro. Saberes e poderes no hospital. Uma sociologia dos serviços hospitalares. 1993; Edições Afrontamento: Porto.
- M. Foucault. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. 1989; Routledge: London.
- I. Olza Fernández. Humanizar el parto? Una reflexión sobre la violencia sanitaria. Maternidad y ciclo vital de la mujer Zaragoza. 2008; Prensas universitarias de Zaragoza. 113–120.
- C.T. Beck, R.K. Gable. A Mixed Methods Study of Secondary Traumatic Stress in Labor and Delivery Nurses. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 41(6): 2012; 747–760. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01386.x.
- B.K. Rothman. In labour: women and power in the birth place. 1982; Junction Books: London.
- D. Ruiz-Berdún. Desarrollo histórico de una profesión: las matronas en Madrid hasta la Guerra Civil. [dissertation]. 2012; Universidad de Alcalá: Alcalá de Henares.
- A. Oakley. Women confined. Towards a sociology of childbirth. 1980; Martin Robertson: Oxford.
- E. Martin. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. 1992; Beacon Press: Boston.
- M. Foucault. History of sexualty: The will to knowledge. 1978; Penguin Books: London.
- S. Segal. The masculinization project of hospital birth practices and Hollywood comedies. eSharp. 9: 2007; 1–18. www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_41220_en.pdf.
- P. Bourdieu. Masculine Domination. 2001; Stanford University Press: Stanford.
- The Secretary of State and the health service in England. National Health Service Act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/41/contents. 2006
- A.B. Lalonde, S. Miller. Mother-Baby Friendly Facilities Initiative. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 128: 2015; 93–94. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.002.