Embodied experiences of prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality and pregnancy termination

References

• L. Hui, E.E. Muggli, J.L. Halliday. Population-based trends in prenatal screening and diagnosis for aneuploidy: a retrospective analysis of 38years of state-wide data. BJOG. 123(1): 2016; 90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lewis, G. McGillivray, S. Rowlands. Perinatal outcome following suspected fetal abnormality when managed through a fetal management unit. Prenatal Diagnosis. 30(2): 2010; 149–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lafarge, K. Mitchell, P. Fox. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: a meta-ethnography of women’s experiences. Reproductive Health Matters. 22(44): 2014; 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ekelin, E. Crang-Svalenius, B. Nordstrom. Parents' experiences, reactions and needs regarding a nonviable fetus diagnosed at a second trimester routine ultrasound. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 37(4): 2008; 446–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.d.L. Ferreira da Costa, E. Hardy, D.O. MJ. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality incompatible with life: women's experiences in Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters. 13(26): 2005; 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gammeltoft, M.H. Tran, T.H. Nguyen. Late-term abortion for fetal anomaly: Vietnamese women's experiences. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31): 2008; 46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Asplin, H. Wessel, L. Marions. Pregnant women's perspectives on decision-making when a fetal malformation is detected by ultrasound examination. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 4(2): 2013; 79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.F. France, L. Locock, K. Hunt. Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality. Health Expectations. 15(2): 2012; 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Hunt, E. France, S. Ziebland. “My brain couldn't move from planning a birth to planning a funeral”: a qualitative study of parents' experiences of decisions after ending a pregnancy for fetal abnormality. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 46(8): 2009; 1111–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Bryar. One day you’re pregnant and one day you’re not: pregnancy interruption for fetal anomalies. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 26(5): 1997; 559–566.
   Google Scholar
• C. Lafarge, K. Mitchell, P. Fox. Perinatal grief following a termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality: the impact of coping strategies. Prenatal Diagnosis. 33(12): 2013; 1173–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lafarge, K. Mitchell, P. Fox. Women’s experiences of coping with pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Qualitative Health Research. 23(7): 2013; 924–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Nazaré, A. Fonseca, M.C. Canavarro. Adaptive and maladaptive grief responses following TOPFA: actor and partner effects of coping strategies. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 31(3): 2013; 257–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L.M. McCoyd. What do women want? Experiences and reflections of women after prenatal diagnosis and termination for anomaly. Health Care for Women International. 30(6): 2009; 507–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fisher, C. Lafarge. Women’s experience of care when undergoing termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly in England. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 33(1): 2015; 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.D. Leichtentritt. Silenced voices: Israeli mothers’ experience of feticide. Social Science and Medicine. 72: 2011; 747–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kolker, B.M. Burke. Grieving the wanted child: ramifications of abortion after prenatal diagnosis of abnormality. Health Care for Women International. 14: 1993; 513–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L.H. Harris. Second trimester abortion provision: breaking the silence and changing the discourse. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 supplement): 2008; 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Parens, A. Asch. The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 9(1): 2003; 40–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abortion Law Reform Act (Vic). Victorian legislation and parliamentary documents Australia 2008. State of Victoria, Australia, 2008. Available athttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/alra2008209
   Google Scholar
• B.K. Rothman. The tentative pregnancy: how amniocentesis changes the experience of motherhood. 1986; Viking Penguin: New York.
   Google Scholar
• I.M. Young. Pregnant embodiment: subjectivity and alienation. On female body experience: “Throwing like a girl” and other essays. 2005; Oxford UP: Oxford, 46–61. (Reprinted from Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1984;9:45-62).
   Google Scholar
• R. Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus. 1999; Routledge: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• L.M. Purdy. Reproducing persons: issues in feminist bioethics. 1996; Cornell UP: New York.
   Google Scholar
• I. Mukkavaara, K. Ohrling, I. Lindberg. Women’s experiences after an induced second trimester abortion. Midwifery. 28: 2012; e720–e725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar