References
- E.BerenyiB.StevensDoes privatization work? A study of eight local servicesState and Local Government Review2019881120
- R.BrooksAn analysis of residential sanitation collection pricing under alternative delivery arrangementsPublic Budgeting and Financial Management71996493514
- M.CouperM.TraugottM.LamiasWeb survey design and administrationPublic Opinion Quarterly652001230253
- S.CrawfordM.CouperM.LamiasWeb surveys: Perceptions of burdenSocial Science Computer Review192001146162
- Deller, S., Hughes, D., & Hinman, D. (2001). Local public services in Wisconsin: Alternatives for municipalities with a focus on privatization. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics. AAE Staff Paper 41.
- D.A.DillmanMail and internet surveys: The tailored design method2nd ed.2000John Wiley and SonsNew York, NY
- R.M.GrovesM.P.CooperNonresponse in household interview studies1998John Wiley and SonsNew York, NY
- Hirsch, W. (1991). Privatizing government services: an economic analysis of contracting out. University of California, Los Angeles: Institute of Industrial Relations.
- W.HirschContracting out by urban governments: A reviewUrban Affairs Review301995458472
- W.HirschFactors important in government privatization decisionsUrban Affairs Review311995226243
- Holland, D.W., Geier, H.T., & Schuster, E.G. (1997). Using IMPLAN to identify rural development opportunities. Ogden, Utah: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Resource Station General Technical Report, INT-GTR-350.
- J.J.HoxE.D.DeLeeuwA comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveysQuality and Quantity281994329344
- Hughes, D., & Zaricki, S. (2001). Growing the economy of Clay County through industry targeting: A preliminary analysis. In Presented at the southern regional science association annual meetings, Austin, Texas.
- R.JensenThe concept of accuracy in regional input–output modelsInternational Regional Science Review51980139154
- R.JohnsonN.WalzerCompetition for city services: Has the time arrived? Privatization in Illinois municipalities1996Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs at Western Illinois UniversityMacomb, Illinois
- M.LahrA review of the literature supporting the hybrid approach to constructing regional input–output modelsEconomic Systems Research51993277293
- D.LinowesThe future of privatizationNational Forum70199024
- Minnesota IMPLAN Group Inc. (2000). IMPLAN professional version 2.0: Social accounting and impact analysis software user's manual. Stillwater, Minnesota: Minnesota IMPLAN User's Group Inc.
- D.MorganR.EnglandThe two facts of privatizationPublic Administration Review481988979987
- P.Morrel-SamuelsGetting the truth into workplace surveysHarvard Business Review802002111118
- D.OsborneT.GaeblerReinventing government1993Penguin Books Inc.New York, NY
- J.RoundNon-survey techniques: a critical review of the theory and the evidenceInternational Regional Science Review81983189212
- W.SchafferK.ChuNon-survey techniques for constructing regional interindustry modelsPapers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association23196983101
- S.SillsC.SongInnovations in survey research: an application of web-based surveysSocial Science Computer Review2020022230
- J.SteeleL.BourkeA.E.LuloffP.S.LiaoG.L.TheodoriR.S.KrannichThe drop-off/pick-up method for household survey researchJournal of the Community Development Society3222001238250
- H.SullivanPrivatization of public services: A growing threat to constitutional rightsPublic Administration Review471987461471
- C.WolfJr.Markets or governments: Choosing between imperfect alternatives1988MIT PressCambridge, MA
- Yun, G., & Trumbo, C. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, and web form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6, on-line, http://www.ascuse.org/jeme/vol6/issue1/yun.html.