Utilization of oral contraception: The impact of direct and indirect restrictions on access to abortion

References

• G.A.AkerlofJ.L.YellenM.L.KatzAn analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United StatesQuarterly Journal of Economics11121996277317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.BankoleS.SinghT.HaasReasons why women have induced abortions: Evidence from 27 countriesInternational Family Planning Perspectives2431998 117–127, 152
   Google Scholar
• C.BorgmannAbortion parental notice laws: Irrational, unnecessary and downright dangerous2009University of Pittsburgh School of Law, JURIST Legal News and Research online posting, 27 July 2009. Retrieved from: http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2009/07/abortion-parental-notice-laws.php
   Google Scholar
• R.R.BrownR.T.JewellR.ToddJ.R.RousProvider availability, race, and abortion demandSouthern Economic Journal6732001, January656671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.R.CulwellJ.FeinglassThe association of health insurance with use of prescription contraceptivesPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health3942007226230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A.EverettC.W.WarrenJ.S.SantelliL.KannJ.L.CollinsL.J.KolbeUse of birth control pills, condoms, and withdrawal among U.S. high school studentsJournal of Adolescent Health2722000 August112118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J.FelkeyK.M.LybeckerThe role of restrictive abortion legislation in explaining variation in oral contraceptive useColorado College working paper no. 2011-032011 June
   Google Scholar
• L.B.FinerL.F.FrohwirthL.A.DauphineS.SinghA.M.MooreReasons U.S. women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectivesPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health3732005 September110118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.B.FinerL.F.FrohwirthL.A.DauphineS.SinghA.M.MooreTiming of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United StatesContraception7442006 October334344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J.FrostJ.E.DarrochFactors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health4022008 June94104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J.FrostS.SinghL.B.FinerFactors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health3922007 August9099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.GayJ.LynxwilerThe impact of religiosity on race variations in abortion attitudesSociological Spectrum1931999 July–August359377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.GoberWhy abortion rates vary: A geographical examination of the supply and demand for abortion services in the United States in 1988Annals of the Association of American Geographers8421994 June230250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.GoberThe role of access in explaining state abortion ratesSocial Science and Medicine447199710031016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.GoldinL.F.KatzCareer and marriage in the age of the pillAmerican Economic Review9022000 May461465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K.HenshawK.KostParental involvement in minors’ abortion decisionFamily Planning Perspectives2451992196207 213
   Google Scholar
• S.K.HenshawK.KostTrends in the characteristics of women obtaining abortions, 1974–20042008 AugustGuttmacher Institute
   Google Scholar
• R.K.JonesJ.E.DarrochS.K.HenshawContraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000–2001Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health3462002294303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.K.JonesJ.E.DarrochS.K.HenshawPatterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000–2001Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health3452002226235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.K.JonesM.R.ZolnaS.K.HenshawL.B.FinerAbortion in the United States: Incidence and access to services, 2005Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health4012008 March616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.KirkmanH.RoweA.HardimanS.MallettD.RosenthalReasons women give for abortion: A review of the literatureArchives of Women's Mental Health1262009365378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.KlermanU.S. abortion policy and fertilityAmerican Economic Review8921999 May261264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.B.LevineSex and consequences: Abortion, public policy, and the economics of fertility2007Princeton University PressPrinceton, NJ
   Google Scholar
• V.LiG.WongS.QiuF.CaoP.LiJ.SunCharacteristics of women having abortions in ChinaSocial Science and Medicine3141990445453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.T.LichterD.K.McLaughlinD.C.RibarState abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formationFamily Planning Perspectives3061998 November–December281287
   Google Scholar
• M.H.MedoffAbortion costs, sexual behavior, and pregnancy ratesSocial Science Journal4512008156172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H.MedoffBiased abortion counseling laws and abortion demandSocial Science Journal4642009632643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.J.MeierD.P.Haider-MarkelA.J.StanislawskiD.R.McFarlaneThe impact of state-level restrictions on abortionDemography3331996 August307312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.D.MosherContraceptive practice in the United States, 1982–1988Family Planning Perspectives2251990 September–October198205
   Google Scholar
• W.D.MosherG.M.MartinezA.ChandraJ.C.AbmaS.J.WillsonUse of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics, no. 3502004 DecemberNational Center for Health Statistics Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs
   Google Scholar
• J.G.MurphyB.E.SymingtonS.JacobsonCan effective birth control be legislated? An analysis of factors that predict birth control utilizationJournal of Public Health Policy521984 June198212
   Google Scholar
• NARAL Pro-Choice AmericaWho decides: A state by state review of abortion rights in America1989NARAL Pro-Choice America
   Google Scholar
• NARAL Pro-Choice AmericaWho decides: A state by state review of abortion and reproductive rights in America1995NARAL Pro-Choice America
   Google Scholar
• NARAL Pro-Choice AmericaWho decides: A state by state review of abortion and reproductive rights in America2002NARAL Pro-Choice America
   Google Scholar
• L.PiccininoW.D.MosherTrends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982–1995Family Planning Perspectives3011998410 46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S.RigdonAbortion law and practice in China: An overview with comparisons to the United StatesSocial Science and Medicine4241996543560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R.SableM.K.LibbusBeliefs concerning contraceptive acquisition and use among low-income womenJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved931998 August262275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.SenFrequency of sexual activity among unmarried adolescent girls: Do state policies pertaining to abortion access matter?Eastern Economic Journal3222006 Spring313330
   Google Scholar
• B.SenState abortion restrictions and child fatal-injury: An exploratory studySouthern Economic Journal7332007 January553574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.SideniusResearch note: Study of women seeking abortionSocial Science and Medicine121978423424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.G.SteinhoffR.G.SmithJ.A.PalmoreM.DiamondC.S.ChungWomen who obtain repeat abortions: A study based on record linkageFamily Planning Perspective111979 January–February3038
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L.T.StraussS.B.GambleW.Y.ParkerD.A.CookS.B.ZaneS.Hamdan Abortion surveillance – United States, 2003. Surveillance summary Vol. 55, No. SS11 (2006 November) Division of Reproductive Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. Washington, DC. 1–32. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/Mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5511a1.htm
   Google Scholar
• C.TietzeRepeat abortions—Why more?Family Planning Perspectives101978 September–October286288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y.P.VenierisF.D.SeboldR.D.HarperThe impact of economic, technological and demographic factors on aggregate birthsThe Review of Economics and Statistics5541973 November493497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.WalzerThe role of gender in determining abortion attitudesSocial Science Quarterly7531994 September687693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.G.WhittakerM.BergerK.A.ArmstrongT.L.FeliceJ.AdamsCharacteristics associated with emergency contraception use by family planning patients: A prospective cohort studyPerspectives of Sexual and Reproductive Health3932007 September158165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar