Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Trade and the Environment Debate: Recent Developments and Implications for China

References

• Antweiler, W., B.R. Copeland, and M.S. Taylor. 2001. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review 91(4):877–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., T. F. Rutherford, and E. J. Balistreri. 2012. The Role of Border Carbon Adjustment in Unilateral Climate Policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum Study (EMF 29). Energy Economics 34(Suppl. 2):S97–S110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L.G., R. Fisman, and C. F. Foley. 2006. Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(1):312–349.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T.L. 2008, February. Climate Change Policies and Trade Policies: The New Joint Agenda. Background Paper for the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Expert Meeting, Geneva. UNEP, Geneva, 41 pp. http://www.unep.ch/etb/events/Trade%20and%20Climate%20Change/Brewer%20climate%20and%20trade%20paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., and R. Elliott. 2003. Determining the Trade-Environment Composition Effect: The Role of Capital, Labour and Environmental Regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(3):363–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, B.R., and M.S. Taylor. 2004. Trade, Growth and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature 42(1):7–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederington, J, A. Levinson, and J. Minier. 2006. Footloose and Pollution Free. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(1):92–99
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P.G., ed. 1999. Trade, Global Policy, and Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper 402. World Bank, Washington, DC, 214 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Grether, J.-M., and J. de Melo. 2004. Globalization and Dirty Industries: Do Pollution Havens Matter? In Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, R.E. Baldwin and A. Winters, eds. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 167–208.
   Google Scholar
• Grether, J.-M., N.A. Mathys, and J. de Melo. 2009a. Global Manufacturing SO2 Emissions: Does Trade Matter? Review of World Economics 145(4):713–729.
   Google Scholar
• Grether, J.-M., N.A. Mathys, and J. de Melo. 2009b. Scale, Technique and Composition Effects in Manufacturing SO2 Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics 43(2):257–274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübler, M. 2012. Carbon Tariffs on Chinese Exports: Emissions Reduction, Threat, or Farce? Energy Policy 50(C):315–327.
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., R. Marschinski, and M. Hübler. 2011. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: A Trade-Theory Analysis of Leakage under Production- and Consumption-Based Policies. Paper presented at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 18th Annual Conference, June 29–July 2, 2011, Rome, 41 pp. Available at http://www.webmeets.com/EAERE/2011/prog/viewpaper.asp?pid=1108.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. 2009. The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues. American Economic Review 99(2):343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, A., and S. Taylor. 2008. Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect. International Economic Review 49(1):223–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, P., ed. 1992. International Trade and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper 159. World Bank, Washington, DC, 365 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, M., and D. Wheeler, 1998. In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960–1999. Journal of Environment and Development 7(3):215–247.
   Google Scholar
• Reinaud, J. 2008. Climate Policy and Carbon Leakage: Impacts of the European Emissions Trading Scheme on Aluminium. International Energy Agency (IEA) Information Paper. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/IEA, Paris, 45 pp. Available at http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Aluminium_EU_ETS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzel, M., M. Hübler, and S. Peterson. 2012. Fair, Optimal or Detrimental? Environmental vs. Strategic Use of Border Carbon Adjustment. Energy Economics 34(Suppl. 2):S198–S207.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank 2008. International Trade and Climate Change: Economic, Legal and Institutional Perspectives. Environment and Development Series. World Bank, Washington, DC, 144 pp.
   Google Scholar
• World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). N.d. Reference Data. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://wits.worldbank.org/wits/data_details.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001, November 20. Ministerial Declaration. In Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference, November 9–14, 2001, Doha, Qatar. WTO, Geneva, 10 pp. Available at http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2004. Trade and Environment at the WTO. Background paper. WTO, Geneva. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/trade_env_e.htm.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2005, November 17. Synthesis of Submissions on Environmental Goods. Committee on Trade and Environment, Special Session. Informal Note by the Secretariat. TN/TE/W/63.17. WTO, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). N.d., a. Eliminating Trade Barriers on Environmental Goods and Services. WTO, Geneva. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_neg_serv_e.htm.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. N.d., b. WTO Rules and Environmental Policies: GATT Exceptions. WTO, Geneva. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envt_rules_exceptions_e.htm.
   Google Scholar