References
- Bubner, R. (1982). Habermas’s concept of critical theory. In J. B. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.), Habermas: Critical debates. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Burman, E., & Parker, 1. (1997). Introduction-discourse analysis: The tum to the text. In E. Burman & 1. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. New York: Routledge.
- Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 1, 23–41.
- Gergen, M. (1989). Induction and construction: Teetering between worlds. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19,431–437.
- Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Universi~y Press.
- Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Harré, R., & Gillet, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Latendresse, D., Smith, M., & Rettig, S. (1996). Black identity: The O. J. Simpson case. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 273–304.
- Magee, B. (1973). Karl Popper. New York: The Viking Press.
- Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a definition of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.
- Peursen, C. A. (1969). Ludwig Wittgenstein: An introduction to his philosophy. London: Faber and Faber.
- Popper, K. (1985). In D. Miller (Ed.), Popper selections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1990). Nigel Lawson’s tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 405–424.
- Ratner, C. (1996). Solidifying qualitative methodology. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5,319–326.
- Rettig, S. (1988). Are “dialogic” data positive? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 9, 97–112.
- Rettig, S. (1990a). On discursive evidence. In R. W. Rieber & W. A. Steward (Eds.), The language scientist as expert in the legal setting: Issues in forensic linguistics. Workshop entitled the use of the language scientist as expert in the legal setting. New York: Academy of Sciences 606,65–72.
- Rettig, S. (1990b). The discursive social psychology of evidence: Symbolic construction of reality. New York: Plenum Press.
- Rettig, S. (1993). Can relating the past disclose the future? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14, 133–144.
- Rettig, S. (1997). Outline of human inquiry systems. Unpublished manuscript, Hunter College-CUNY, New York.
- Rommetveit, R. (1983). Prospective social psychological contributions to a truly interdisciplinary understanding of ordinary language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 89–104.
- Rychlak, J. F. (1996). An enquiry into the Hermeneutic-Dialectic method of inquiry. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 305–317.
- Shotter, J. (1993). Harre, Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Vico, Wittgenstein: Academic discourses and conversational realities. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 23, 459–483.
- Stern, D. G. (1995). Wittgenstein on ,nind and language. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the socialformation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.