28
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Background of Discourse Analysis: A New Paradigm in Social Psychology

Pages 25-40 | Published online: 07 Jul 2016

References

  • Bubner, R. (1982). Habermas’s concept of critical theory. In J. B. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.), Habermas: Critical debates. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Burman, E., & Parker, 1. (1997). Introduction-discourse analysis: The tum to the text. In E. Burman & 1. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. New York: Routledge.
  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 1, 23–41.
  • Gergen, M. (1989). Induction and construction: Teetering between worlds. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19,431–437.
  • Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Universi~y Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Harré, R., & Gillet, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latendresse, D., Smith, M., & Rettig, S. (1996). Black identity: The O. J. Simpson case. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 273–304.
  • Magee, B. (1973). Karl Popper. New York: The Viking Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a definition of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.
  • Peursen, C. A. (1969). Ludwig Wittgenstein: An introduction to his philosophy. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Popper, K. (1985). In D. Miller (Ed.), Popper selections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1990). Nigel Lawson’s tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 405–424.
  • Ratner, C. (1996). Solidifying qualitative methodology. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5,319–326.
  • Rettig, S. (1988). Are “dialogic” data positive? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 9, 97–112.
  • Rettig, S. (1990a). On discursive evidence. In R. W. Rieber & W. A. Steward (Eds.), The language scientist as expert in the legal setting: Issues in forensic linguistics. Workshop entitled the use of the language scientist as expert in the legal setting. New York: Academy of Sciences 606,65–72.
  • Rettig, S. (1990b). The discursive social psychology of evidence: Symbolic construction of reality. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Rettig, S. (1993). Can relating the past disclose the future? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14, 133–144.
  • Rettig, S. (1997). Outline of human inquiry systems. Unpublished manuscript, Hunter College-CUNY, New York.
  • Rommetveit, R. (1983). Prospective social psychological contributions to a truly interdisciplinary understanding of ordinary language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 89–104.
  • Rychlak, J. F. (1996). An enquiry into the Hermeneutic-Dialectic method of inquiry. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 305–317.
  • Shotter, J. (1993). Harre, Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Vico, Wittgenstein: Academic discourses and conversational realities. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 23, 459–483.
  • Stern, D. G. (1995). Wittgenstein on ,nind and language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the socialformation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.