Measuring Situation Awareness in Virtual Environment-Based Training

References

• Brannick, M. T., Prince, A., Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1995). The measurement of team process. Human Factors, 37, 641–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., Hackworth, C. A., Truitt, T. R., Crutchfield, J., Nikolic, D., & Manning, C. A. (1998). Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 5, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1993). A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995a). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., &Bolstad, C. A. (1994). Individual differences in pilot situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 241–264.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., Holder, L. D., Leibrecht, B. C., Garland, D. J., Matthews, M. D., & Graham, S. E. (2000). Modeling and measuring situation awareness in the infantry operational environment ( Research Report No. 1753). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 5, 178–186.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Winner, J. L. (2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control systems. Ergonomics, 49, 1312–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugerty, L., & Tirre, W. (1997). Situation awareness: A validation study and investigation of individual differences. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyAnnual Meeting, 40, 564–568. doi:10.1177/154193129604001202
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R. M., & Holmquist, J. P. (2005). Training in virtual and augmented realities: An interview with Bruce Knerr. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hendy, K. C., Hamilton, K. M., & Landry, L. N. (1993). Measuring subjective workload: When is one scale better than many? Human Factors, 35, 579–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, G. R. J. (1986). Changes in operator efficiency as a function of environmental stress, fatigue and circadian rhythms. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and performance (pp. 44/1–44/49). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. G., & Endsley, M. R. (2000). Can real-time probes provide a valid measure of situation awareness? In D. B. Kaber & M. R. Endsley (Eds.), Human performance, situation awareness and automation: User-centered design for the new millennium (pp. 245–250). Atlanta, GA: SA Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (1998). Team situation awareness for process control safety and performance. Process Safety Progress, 17, 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaber, D. B., Riley, J. M., Lampton, D., & Endsley, M. R. (2005). Measuring situation awareness in a virtual urban environment for dismounted infantry training. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 9). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum & Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Lampton, D. R., Riley, J. M., Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2006, November). Use of immersive virtual environments for measuring and training situation awareness. Paper presented at the U.S. Army Science Conference, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. D., Pleban, R. J., Endsley, M. R., & Strater, L. D. (2000). Measures of infantry situation awareness for a virtual MOUT environment. In D. B. Kaber & M. R. Endsley (Eds.), Human performance, situation awareness and automation: User-centered design for the new millennium (pp. 262–267). Atlanta, GA: SA Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare, D. (1997). Cognitive ability determinants of elite pilot performance. Human Factors, 39, 540–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleban, R. J., Eakin, D. E., Salter, M. S., & Matthews, M. D. (2001). Training and assessment of decision-making skills in virtual environments ( Research Report 1767). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sharit, J., & Salvendy, G. (1982). Occupational stress: Review and reappraisal. Human Factors, 24, 129–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strater, L. D., Endsley, M. R., Pleban, R. J., & Matthews, M. D. (2001). Measures of platoon leader situation awareness in virtual decision-making exercises ( Research report no. 1770). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. M., Endsley, M. R., & Henderson, S. (1996). Situational awareness workshop report. In B. J. Hayward & A. R. Lowe (Eds.), Applied aviation psychology: Achievement, change and challenge (pp. 447–454). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. C., & Kaber, D. B. (2003). Team coordination and strategies under automation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47, 553–557. doi:10.1177/154193120304700363
   Google Scholar