The Predictive Role of Simulations in Assessing Military Performance

References

• Anderson, N. (2004). The dark side of the moon: Applicant perspectives, negative psychological effects (NPEs), and candidate decision making in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 1–8. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00259.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435–442. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callinan, M., & Robertson, I. T. (2000). Work sample testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 248–260. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, H. M., & Burns, A. C. (1999). A framework for assessing the competencies reflected in simulation performance. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 26, 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Clevenger, J., Pereira, G. M., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., & Schmidt-Harvey, V. (2001). Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 410–417. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, A. H., & Cannon, H. M. (2002). Constructs of simulation evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 425–440. doi:10.1177/1046878102238606
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, A. H., & Cannon, H. M. (2003). A hermeneutical approach to external validation of simulation models. Simulation & Gaming, 34, 186–197. doi:10.1177/1046878103034002002
   Google Scholar
• Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence, and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152–194. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53, 563–593. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 927–940. doi:10.1037/a0023496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640–647. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). A research note on the incremental validity of job knowledge and integrity tests for predicting maximal performance. Human Performance, 20, 293–303. doi:10.1080/08959280701333461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Staffing organizations: Contemporary practice and research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rom, E., & Mikulincer, M. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1220–1235. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, P., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58, 1009–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00714.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Held, J. D., & Weissmuller, J. J. (2009). Performance measurement in simulation-based training: A review and best practices. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 328–376. doi:10.1177/1046878108326734
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Clause, C. S., & Pulakos, E. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job-relevant constructs. In C. L. Cooper & J. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 115–140). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., & Mills, A. E. (2001). Traditional test and job simulations: Minority and majority performance and test validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 451–458. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, A. I., & Bergman, B. A. (1975). A job learning approach for performance prediction. Personnel Psychology, 28, 325–339. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, D. S., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134–141. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekley, J. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2006). An introduction to situational judgment testing. In J. A. Weekley, & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application (pp. 1–10). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzler, I. (2008). The ten commandments for translating simulation results into real-life performance. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 98–109. doi:10.1177/1046878107308077
   Google Scholar