320
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Is traditional, open-source, or on-demand first choice? Developing an AHP-based framework for the comparison of different software models in office suites selection

Pages 542-559 | Received 12 Oct 2009, Accepted 11 Mar 2011, Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • AksuluAWadeMA comprehensive review and synthesis of open source researchJournal of the Association for Information Systems20101111576656
  • AndersonEEChoice models for the evaluation and selection of software packagesJournal of Management Information Systems19906412313810.1080/07421222.1990.11517875
  • AndersonEEChenY-MMicrocomputer software evaluation: an econometric modelDecision Support Systems1997192759210.1016/S0167-9236(96)00042-5
  • ArmstrongJSOvertonTSEstimating nonresponse bias in mail surveysJournal of Marketing Research197714339640210.2307/3150783
  • BagchiPRaoRDecision-making in mergers: an application of the analytic hierarchy processManagerial and Decision Economics199213919910.1002/mde.4090130202
  • BartholomewDOpen-source obstaclesBaselineMag20087841415
  • BeckMPLinBWSelection of automated office systems: a case studyOmega19819216917610.1016/0305-0483(81)90018-9
  • BenlianAHessTBuxmannPDrivers of SaaS-adoption: an empirical study of different application typesBusiness & Information Systems Engineering20091535736910.1007/s12599-009-0068-x
  • Bessen JE (2005) Open source software: free provision of complex public goods. [WWW document] http://ssrn.com/abstract=588763 (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • BishopMComputer Security – Art and Science2003
  • BlockDKalyoncuASelection of word processing software for library useInformation Technology and Libraries198323252260
  • BorensteinDTowards a practical method to validate decision support systemsDecision Support Systems199823322723910.1016/S0167-9236(98)00046-3
  • BorensteinDBetencourtPRBA multi-criteria model for the justification of IT investmentsINFOR2005431121
  • BotellaPBurguesXCarvalloJPFranchXQuerCUsing quality models for assessing COTS selectionWorkshop on Requirements Engineering2002263277
  • BrehmLHeinzlAMarkusMLTailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implicationsProceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences2001
  • BrownRMStephensonKThe evaluation of purchased computer softwareMid-South Business Journal19811July811
  • BryceMBryceTMake or buy software?Journal of Systems Management198738611
  • ButlerBSGrayPHReliability, mindfulness, and information systemsMIS Quarterly2006302211224
  • ByunDHSuhEHA methodology for evaluating EIS software packagesJournal of End User Computing1996822131
  • CapraEFrancalanciCMerloFAn empirical study on the relationship between software design quality, development effort and governance in open source projectsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering200834676578210.1109/TSE.2008.68
  • ChauPYKFactors used in the selection of packaged software in small businesses: views of owners and managersInformation and Management1995292717810.1016/0378-7206(95)00016-P
  • ChouTSeven Business Models for Software2008
  • ColomboEFrancalanciCSelecting CRM packages based on architectural, functional, and cost requirements: empirical validation of a hierarchical ranking modelRequirements Engineering20049318620310.1007/s00766-003-0184-y
  • CusumanoMAReflections on free and open softwareCommunications of the ACM20044710252710.1145/1022594.1022615
  • CusumanoMAThe changing software business: moving from products to servicesComputer2008411202710.1109/MC.2008.29
  • DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPRUser acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical modelsManagement Science1989358982100310.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • DavisLWilliamsGEvaluating and selecting simulation software using the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessIntegrated Manufacturing Systems199451233210.1108/09576069410050314
  • Dekkers MWH (2002) Office productivity suite competitive analysis. White paper [WWW document] http://xml.coverpages.org/Dekkers-OOocompanalysis.pdf (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • DubeyAWagleDDelivering software as a serviceMcKinsey Quarterly20076112
  • FalknerCHBenhajlaSMulti-attribute decision models in the justification of CIM systemsThe Engineering Economist19903529111410.1080/00137919008903008
  • FayadMEAltmanAAn introduction to software stabilityCommunications of the ACM2001449959810.1145/383694.383713
  • FitzgeraldBThe transformation of open source softwareMIS Quarterly2006303587598
  • GoodeSSomething for nothing: management rejection of open source software in Australia's top firmsInformation & Management200542566968110.1016/j.im.2004.01.011
  • GorgionneGAAn AHP model of DSS effectivenessEuropean Journal of Information Systems1999829510610.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000322
  • Hall M (2008) On the mark: SaaS slips past information technology's final barrier. Computer World Online 14 April 2008 [WWW document] http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/316501/SaaS_Slips_Past_Last_Barrier (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • HarringtonSJGuimaraesTCorporate culture, absorptive capacity and IT successInformation & Organization2005151396310.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.10.002
  • HemphillTAA taxonomy of closed and open source software industry business modelsInternational Journal of Innovation & Technology Management200631618210.1142/S0219877006000661
  • HirschheimROffice Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective1985
  • ISO (2001) ISO/IEC 9126-1: 2001, Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission, pp 25.
  • ISO (2005) ISO/IEC 25000: 2005, Software Engineering – Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Guide to SQuaRE. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission, pp 41.
  • JadhavASSonarRMEvaluating and selecting software packages: a reviewInformation & Software Technology200951355556310.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.003
  • Johannsen C (1980) Software selection criteria outlined. Computerworld 4 February, p 33.
  • JurisonJThe role of risk and return in information technology outsourcing decisionsJournal of Information Technology199510423910.1057/jit.1995.27
  • KarelsMJCommercializing open source softwareACM Queue200315465510.1145/945074.945125
  • KeWWeiKKOrganizational culture and leadership in ERP implementationDecision Support Systems200845220821810.1016/j.dss.2007.02.002
  • KeilMTiwanaARelative importance of evaluation criteria for enterprise systems: a conjoint studyInformation Systems Journal200616323726210.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00218.x
  • Keller E (1994) It's easy to pick applications … Not! Manufacturing Systems January, p 50.
  • KernTLacityMCWillcocksLNetsourcing: Renting Business Applications and Services over a Network2002
  • KernTWillcocksLPLacityMCApplication service provision: risk assessment and mitigationMIS Quarterly Executive200212113126
  • Knowledge@Wharton (2007) Rivals set their sights on Microsoft Office: can they topple the giant? Wharton – University of Pennsylvania, 22 August 2007 [WWW document] http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1795 (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • KonsynskiBRBrackerLCComputer-aided analysis of office systemsMIS Quarterly1982611710.2307/248751
  • LaiVSTruebloodRPWongBKSoftware selection: a case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring systemInformation & Management199936422123210.1016/S0378-7206(99)00021-X
  • LaudonKLaudonJManagement Information Systems – Managing the Digital Firm2002
  • LjungbergJOpen source movements as a model for organisingEuropean Journal of Information Systems20004120821610.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000373
  • LosavioFChirinosLLévyNRamdane-CherifAQuality characteristics for software architectureJournal of Object Technology20032213315010.5381/jot.2003.2.2.a2
  • Mendonca L and Sutton R (2008) Succeeding at open innovation: an interview with Mozilla's Mitchell Baker. McKinsey Quarterly (1), 1–7.
  • MenkenISaaS – The Complete Cornerstone Guide to Software as a SERVICE Best Practices: Concepts, Terms, and Techniques for Successfully Planning, Implementing and Managing SaaS Solutions2008
  • MertzSAEschingerCEidTHuangHHPangCPringBMarket Trends: Software as a Service, Worldwide, 2008–20132009
  • MontazemiARCameronDAGuptaKMAn empirical study of factors affecting software package selectionJournal of Management Information Systems19961318910510.1080/07421222.1996.11518113
  • MuralidharKSanthanamRWilsonRLUsing the Analytic Hierarchy Process for information system project selectionInformation & Management1990182879510.1016/0378-7206(90)90055-M
  • NelsonMSenRSubramanianCUnderstanding open source software development: a research classification frameworkCommunications of AIS20061712266287
  • NobleFImplementation strategies for office systemsThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems19954323925310.1016/0963-8687(95)96804-H
  • Olbrich C and Koch S (2006) Ergebnisse eines empirischen Usability-Vergleichs von Open und Closed Source Office Paketen anhand von Microsoft Office und OpenOffice.org. Working Papers on Information Systems, Information Business and Operations, Department of Information Systems and Operations Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna, Austria, 01 March 2006 [WWW document] http://epub.wu-wien.ac.at/dyn/virlib/wp/mediate/epub-wu-01_8f7.pdf?ID=epub-wu-01_8f7 (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • PalmerJWWeb site usability, design, and performance metricsInformation Systems Research200213215116710.1287/isre.13.2.151.88
  • PavaCHManaging New Office Technology: An Organizational Strategy1984
  • Pettey C (2006) Gartner says 25 percent of new business software will be delivered as Software as a Service by 2011. Gartner, Stamford, Conn., Gartner Report 03 October 2006 [WWW document] http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=496886 (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • PivnicnyVCCarmodyJGCriteria help hospitals evaluate vendor proposalsHealthcare Financial Management1989433843
  • RahtzSMetcalfeROpen source deployment and development: support models for open source deploymentOSS Watch Inaugural Conference2004
  • RaymondEThe Cathedral and the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary2001
  • Romanow D, Keil M and Mcfarlan FW (1998) Timberjack Parts: Packaged software selection project, Case #9-398-085.
  • SaatyTLThe Analytic Hierarchy Process1980
  • SaatyTLHow to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessInterfaces1994246194310.1287/inte.24.6.19
  • SaatyTLTheory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks2005
  • SaatyTLDecision making with the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessInternational Journal of Services Sciences200811839810.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • SarkerSMunsonCLSarkerSChakrabortySAssessing the relative contribution of the facets of agility to distributed systems development success: an Analytic Hierarchy Process approachEuropean Journal of Information Systems200918428529910.1057/ejis.2009.25
  • SassonePGCost-benefit methodology for office systemsACM Transactions on Information Systems19875327328910.1145/27641.28059
  • SawyerSPackaged software: implications of the differences from custom approaches to software developmentEuropean Journal of Information Systems200091475810.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000345
  • SeidmannAArbelAAn analytic approach for planning computerized office systemsOmega198311660761710.1016/0305-0483(83)90022-1
  • SenRA strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary softwareJournal of Management Information Systems200724123325710.2753/MIS0742-1222240107
  • SerranoNSarriegiJMOpen source software ERPs: a new alternative for an old needIEEE Software2006233949710.1109/MS.2006.78
  • ShneidermanBDesigning the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction1998
  • StamelosIAngelisLOikonomouABlerisGLCode quality analysis in open source software developmentInformation Systems Journal2002121436010.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00117.x
  • TamMCYTummalaVMRAn application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications systemOmega200129217118210.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6
  • Titterton G (2003) Users reveal benefits of Open Source. Computer Weekly 6 May 2003 [WWW document] http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dis/m0COW/2003_May_6/101269983/p1/article.jhtml (accessed 24 September 2010).
  • WaringTMaddocksPOpen source software implementation in the UK public sector: evidence from the field and implications for the futureInternational Journal of Information Management200525541142810.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.06.002
  • WeiC-CChienC-FWangM-JJAn AHP-based approach to ERP system selectionInternational Journal of Production Economics2005961476210.1016/j.ijpe.2004.03.004
  • WhettenDAWhat constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review198914449049510.2307/258554
  • Wingfiled N (2009) Microsoft stung by global PC slump. The Wall Street Journal Online, 24 April 2009 [WWW document] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124051825214249437.html (accessed 8 December 2010).
  • XinMLevinaNSoftware-as-a Service model: elaborating client-side adoption factorsProceedings of the Twenty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, Paper 862008
  • ZahediFThe Analytic Hierarchy Process – a survey of the method and its applicationsInterfaces19861649610810.1287/inte.16.4.96

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.