712
Views
126
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Theoretical Paper

The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model

, &
Pages 1396-1410 | Received 01 Apr 2007, Accepted 01 Jun 2008, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • Aragonés-BeltránPAznarJFerrís-OñateJGarcía-MelónMValuation of urban industrial land: An analytic network process approachEur J Opl Res200818532233910.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.076
  • ASrIA (Association for Sustainable & Responsible Investment in Asia) (2007). SRI in Asia. http://www.asria.org/chinese/sri/asia/sriasia, accessed 18 January 2007.
  • AyağZÖzdemirRGAn intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANPInt J Product Res2007452169219410.1080/00207540600724849
  • Bartolomeo M and Familiari G (2005). Green, social and ethical funds in European-2005 review. http://www.avanzi-sri.org/pdf/complete_report_2005_final.pdf, accessed 13 January 2007.
  • Bieker T and Gminder CU (2001). Towards a sustainability balanced scorecard. Environmental Management & Policy and Related Aspects of Sustainability. oikos PhD summer academy 2001, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland, 27–31 August. http://www.oikos-stiftung.unisg.ch/academy2001/Paper_Bieker_Gminder.pdf, accessed 27 August 2006.
  • BoassonEBoassonVChengJInvestment principles and strategies of faith-based fundsManagerial Finance20063283784510.1108/03074350710688323
  • BouriAMartelJMChabchoubHA multi-criterion approach for selecting attractive portfolioJ Multi-Criteria Dec Anal20021126927710.1002/mcda.334
  • Chang SL (2005). Rules on corporate and environmental coexistence. In: Ministry of Economic Affairs (ed). Responsibility and Profit: Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies of Taiwan Multinational Enterprises. Ministry of Economic Affairs: Taipei, pp 60–69 (in Chinese).
  • ChangCWWuCRLinCTLinHLEvaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy & analytic network processesInform Sci20071773383339610.1016/j.ins.2007.02.010
  • ChenRSShyuJZSelecting a weapon system using zero-one goal programming and analytic network processJ Inform Optim Sci200627379399
  • ChiuYJChenHCTzengGHShyuJZMarketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TVInt J Mngt Dec Making2006714316510.1504/IJMDM.2006.009140
  • ChungSHLeeAHIPearnWLAnalytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricatorInt J Product Econom200596153610.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.006
  • CoxPBrammerSMillingtonAAn empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performanceJ Bus Ethics200452274310.1023/B:BUSI.0000033105.77051.9d
  • DemirtasEAÜstünÖAn integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocationOmega—The Int J Mngt Sci200836769010.1016/j.omega.2005.11.003
  • Dias-SardinhaIReijndersLAntunesPFrom environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecardsEnviron Qual Mngt200212516410.1002/tqem.10063
  • DillenburgSGreeneTEreksonHApproaching socially responsible investment with a comprehensive ratings scheme: total social impactJ Bus Ethics20034316717710.1023/A:1022987127960
  • EpsteinMJWisnerPUsing a balanced scorecard to implement sustainabilityEnviron Qual Mngt20011111010.1002/tqem.1300
  • FiggeFHahnTSchalteggerSWagnerMThe sustainability balanced scorecard—linking sustainability management to business strategyBus Strategy Environ20021126928410.1002/bse.339
  • GumbusALussierRNEntrepreneurs use a balanced scorecard to translate strategy into performance measuresJ Small Bus Mngt20064440742510.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00179.x
  • Hamner B (2005). Integrating market-based sustainability indicators and performance management systems. http://cleanerproduction.com/Pubs/pubs/Hamner%20-%20Market%20CSR%20Indicators%20and%20Quality%20Systems.doc, accessed 8 November 2006.
  • HoriSShimizuYDesigning methods of human interface for supervisory control systemsControl Eng Pract199971413141910.1016/S0967-0661(99)00112-4
  • HsuYHIntroduction of UN principles for responsible investmentGretai Securities Market2006122920
  • Hung YH, Chou SCT and Tzeng GH (2006). Using a fuzzy group decision approach-knowledge management adoption. APRU DLI 2006 Conference, University of Tokyo, Japan, 8–10 November. http://apru2006.dir.u-tokyo.ac.jp/pdf/3b-3.pdf, accessed 28 January 2007.
  • JiangYZ2006 Corporate socially responsibility award in TaiwanGlobal Views Monthly2006239215223
  • JurkiewiczCLGiacaloneRAA values framework for measuring the impact of workplace spirituality on organizational performanceJ Bus Ethics20044912914210.1023/B:BUSI.0000015843.22195.b9
  • KaplanRSNortonDPThe balanced scorecard: measures that drive performanceHarvard Bus Rev1992707179
  • KaplanRSNortonDPThe Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action1996
  • LeeCSRI—Forcing business to do wellTaiwan Ponorama2006311619
  • LeeJWKimSHUsing analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selectionComput Opns Res20002736738210.1016/S0305-0548(99)00057-X
  • LeungLCLamKCCaoDImplementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network processJ Opl Res Soc20065768269110.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040
  • LinYZ2006 Corporate socially responsibility award in TaiwanGlobal Views Monthly2005228127133
  • LiuEHsiaoSWANP-GP approach for product variety designInt J Adv Manuf Technol20062921622510.1007/s00170-005-2506-3
  • MahoneyLSThorneLCorporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: Evidence from CanadaJ Bus Ethics20055724125310.1007/s10551-004-5367-z
  • MaignanIFerrellOCMeasuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and FranceJ Bus Ethics20002328329710.1023/A:1006262325211
  • MeadeLMPresleyAR&D project selection using the analytic network processIEEE Trans Eng Mngt200249596610.1109/17.985748
  • MeadeLMSarkisJAnalyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approachInt J Product Res19993724126110.1080/002075499191751
  • MowatDThe VanCity difference—A case for the triple bottom line approach to businessCorporate Environ Strategy20029242910.1016/S1066-7938(01)00155-5
  • Presley A and Meade L (2004). Sustainable production systems evaluation: Using the analytic hierarchy process. In: Sushil G and Nimisha G (eds). Operations Management 2004: The Expanding Constellation. Proceedings of Second World Conference on POM and 15th Annual POM Conference, Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), Paper 002-0417, Cancun, Mexico (CD-ROM).
  • RaviVShankarRTiwariMKAnalyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approachComput Indust Eng20054832735610.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017
  • Renneboog L, Ter Horst J and Zhang C (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J Banking Finance 32: 1723–1742.
  • RufBMMuralidharKPaulKThe development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performanceJ Mngt199824119133
  • RufBMMuralidharKBrownRMJanneyJJPaulKAn empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theoryJ Bus Ethics20013214315610.1023/A:1010786912118
  • SaatyTLDecision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process2001
  • SaraogluHDetzlerMLA sensible mutual fund selection modelFinan Anal J200258607210.2469/faj.v58.n3.2538
  • ScavoneGMChallenges in internal environmental management reporting in ArgentinaJ Cleaner Product2006141276128510.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.011
  • SchniederjansMGarvinTUsing the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costingEur J Opl Res1997100728010.1016/S0377-2217(96)00302-5
  • SethiSPInvesting in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds—because there is no better alternativeJ Bus Ethics2005569912910.1007/s10551-004-5455-0
  • Seyed-HosseiniSMSafaeiNAsgharpourMJReprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory techniqueReliability Eng System Safety20069187288110.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005
  • SolomonASolomonJSutoMCan the UK experience provide lessons for the evolution of SRI in Japan?Corporate Governance—Int Rev20041255256610.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00393.x
  • TamuraHAkazawaKStructural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable societyJ Telecommun Inform Technol200536472
  • TzengGHShiauTAEnergy conservation strategies in urban transportation: Application of multiple criteria decision-makingEnergy Syst Policy198711119
  • TzengGHChiangCHLiCWEvaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATELExpert Syst Appl2007321028104410.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
  • Van de VeldeEVermeirWCortenFCorporate social responsibility and financial performanceCorporate Governance2005512913810.1108/14720700510604760
  • WuWWLeeYTDeveloping global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL methodExpert Syst Appl20073249950710.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.