668
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue Paper

Investment evaluation within project management: an information systems perspective

Pages 917-928 | Received 01 Feb 2009, Accepted 01 Jan 2010, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • Al-YaseenHEldabiTLeesDPaulRJOperational use evaluation of IT investments: An investigation into potential benefitsEur J Opl Res200617331000101110.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.001
  • Al-YaseenHEldabiTPaulRJEl-HaddadehRPost-implementation evaluation of IT systems: A close review of politicsEvaluating Information Systems: Public and Private Sector2008134152
  • AnthonyRPlanning and Control Systems—A Framework for Analysis1965
  • BajajABradleyWECravensKSSAAS: Integrating systems analysis with accounting and strategy for ex ante evaluation of information systems investmentJ Inform Syst20082219712410.2308/jis.2008.22.1.97
  • BallantineJStraySFinancial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making processJ Inform Technol199813131410.1080/026839698344927
  • BallantineJStraySInformation systems and other capital investments: Evaluation practices comparedLogist Inform Mngt1999121–2789310.1108/09576059910256286
  • BesnerCHobbsBProject management practice, generic or contextual: A reality checkProject Mngt J2008391163310.1002/pmj.20033
  • Beynon-DaviesPOwensIWilliamsMDInformation systems evaluation and the information systems development processJ Enterprise Inform Mngt200417427628210.1108/17410390410548689
  • BoxSPlattKWBusiness process management: Establishing and maintaining project alignmentBus Process Mngt J200511437038710.1108/14637150510609408
  • BozdaCEKahramanCRuanDFuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systemComput Ind2003511132910.1016/S0166-3615(03)00029-0
  • BradleyGBenefit Realisation Management: A Practical Guide to Achieving Benefits Through Change2006
  • BraganzaAHackneyRADiffusing management information for legal compliance: the role of the IS organization within the Sarbanes–Oxley ActJ Org End User Comput200720212410.4018/joeuc.2008040101
  • BrynjolfssonEThe productivity paradox of information technologyCommun ACM19933612677710.1145/163298.163309
  • BurnJMSzetoCA comparison of the views of business and IT management on success factors for strategic alignmentInform Mngt2000374197216
  • Butler Cox Foundation ( 1990 ). Getting value from information technology . Research Report, Butler Cox Plc, London, WC1A 2LL, UK .
  • CerulloMJComputer usage in business and accountingInformation & Mgmt19803311312410.1016/0378-7206(80)90010-5
  • ChecklandPAchieving ‘Desirable and feasible' change: An application of soft systems methodologyJ Opl Res Soc198536982183110.1057/jors.1985.141
  • DavidsonJMClamenAKarolRALearning from the best new product developersRes Technol Mgmt1999424812
  • DaiCXWellsWGAn exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performanceInt J Project Mngt200422752353210.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.001
  • Doms M ( 2004 ). The boom and bust of information technology investments. Economic and Research Data Review-2004, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pp 19–34 .
  • FarbeyBLandFTargettDHow to Assess your IT Investment: A Study of Methods and Practice1993
  • FloodRLJacksonMCCreative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention1991
  • FungRYKPereiraACYeungWHRPerformance evaluation of a web-based information system for laboratories and service centresLogist Inform Mngt200013421822710.1108/09576050010340848
  • GemmellMPaganoRPost-implementation evaluation of a student information system in the UK higher education sectorElectron J Inform Syst Eval20036295106
  • Ghoneim A and El-Haddadeh R ( 2006 ). Enhancing IT investments productivity: Integrating network QoS and IT indirect Costs . European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS 2006) . CD Proceedings, Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain, July 6–7 .
  • GulliverFRPost-project appraisals payHarvard Bus Rev1987652128132
  • HaresJRoyleDMeasuring the Value of Information Technology1994
  • HackneyRJonesSLöschATowards an e-Government efficiency agenda: The impact of information and communication behavior on e-reverse auctions in public sector procurementEur J Inform Syst200716217819110.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000677
  • HartmanFAshrafiRAProject management in the information systems and information technologies industriesProject Mngt J2002333515
  • HobdayMThe project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?Res Pol2000297–887189310.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4
  • IraniZInformation systems evaluation: Navigating through the problem domainInform Mngt20024011124
  • IraniZLovePEDThe propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systemsJ Mngt Inform Syst2001173161177
  • IraniZLovePEDDeveloping a frame of reference for ex-ante information system investment evaluationEur J Inform Syst2002111748210.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000411
  • IraniZEzingeardJNGrieveRJIntegrating the costs of an IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision making processInt J Technol Innov Entrep Technol Mngt (Technovation)19971711/12695706
  • IraniZSharifAMLovePEDTransforming failure into success through organizational learning: An analysis of a manufacturing information systemEur J Inform Syst2001101556610.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000384
  • IraniZSharifAMLovePEDKahramanCApplying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model: The IT/IS Investment evaluation processInt J Prod Econ200275119921110.1016/S0925-5273(01)00192-X
  • IraniZJonesSLovePEDEllimanTThemistocleousMEvaluating e-government: Learning from the experiences of two UK local authoritiesInform Syst J2005151618210.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00186.x
  • IraniZLovePEDJonesSLearning lessons from evaluating egovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational governmentJ Strateg Inform Syst200817215516410.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.005
  • JashaparaACognition, culture and competition: An empirical test of the learning organizationLearn Org: An Int J2003101315010.1108/09696470310457487
  • JonesSHughesJUnderstanding IS evaluation as a complex social process: A case study of a UK local authorityEur J Inform Syst200110418920310.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000405
  • KaplanBDuchonDCombining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case studyMISQ198812457158610.2307/249133
  • KaplanRSMust CIM be justified by faith alone?Harvard Bus Rev19866428795
  • KaplanRSNortonDThe balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performanceHarvard Bus Rev19927017179
  • KaplanRSNortonDLinking the balanced scorecard to strategyCalifornia Mngt Rev1996391537910.2307/41165876
  • KerznerHProject Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling2006
  • KumarKPost-implementation evaluation of computer-based information systems: Current practicesCommun ACM199033220321210.1145/75577.75585
  • LefleyFSarkisJShort-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UKInt J Prod Res199735234135510.1080/002075497195795
  • LohmanCFortuinLWoutersMDesigning a performance measurement system: A case studyEur J Opl Res2004156226728610.1016/S0377-2217(02)00918-9
  • LooRTackling ethical dilemmas in project management using vignettesInt J Project Mngt200220748949510.1016/S0263-7863(01)00056-4
  • LovePEDIraniZStandingCLinCBurnJMThe enigma of evaluation: Benefits, costs and risks of IT in Australian small–medium-sized enterprisesInform Mngt2005423947964
  • LuuVTKimS-YHuynhT-AImproving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approachInt J Project Mngt200826775876910.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.002
  • LumbySInvestment Appraisal and Financial Decisions: A First Course in Financial Decision1993
  • LycettMRassauADansonJProgramme management: A critical reviewInt J Project Mngt200422428929910.1016/j.ijproman.2003.06.001
  • MeredithJRSureshNCJustification techniques for advanced manufacturing technologiesInt J Prod Res19862451043105710.1080/00207548608919787
  • MilosevicaDPatanakulbPStandardized project management may increase development projects successInt J Project Mngt200523318119210.1016/j.ijproman.2004.11.002
  • MillerKDArikanATTechnology search investments: Evolutionary, option reasoning, and option pricing approachesStrateg Mngt J200425547348510.1002/smj.392
  • McFarlanWEPortfolio approach to information systemsHarvard Bus Rev198462398103
  • NaikBChakravartyAKStrategic acquisition of new manufacturing technology: A review and research frameworkInt J Prod Res19923071575160110.1080/00207549208948108
  • NolanRLMcFarlanWWInformation technology and the board of directorsHarvard Bus Rev2005831096106
  • NorrieJWalkerDHTA balanced scorecard approach to project management leadershipProject Mngt J20043544756
  • O'ConnellFFast Projects: Project Management when Time is Short2007
  • OsawuwaAWChiemekeSCFactor analysis of post-implementation review of student information system in NigeriaRes J Appl Sci200835353358
  • PavoneVJMethods for economic justification of an arc welding robot installationWeld J198362113946
  • PartingtonDThe project management of organizational changeInt J Project Mngt1996141132110.1016/0263-7863(95)00037-2
  • PhilipsBTA four-level learning organisation benchmark implementation modelLearn Org20031029810510.1108/09696470910462102
  • RamabadronRDeanJWEvansJRBenchmarking and project management: a review and organizational modelBenchmarking: An Int J1997414758
  • RaymondLParéGBergeronFMatching information technology and organizational structure: An empirical study with implications for performanceEur J Inform Syst19954131610.1057/ejis.1995.2
  • RazTMichaelEUse and benefits of tools for project risk managementInt J Project Mngt200119191710.1016/S0263-7863(99)00036-8
  • RemenyiDHow to Prepare a Business Case for IT Investment1999
  • RenkemaTJWBerghoutEWMethodologies for information-systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage—A comparative reviewInform Softw Technol199739111310.1016/0950-5849(96)85006-3
  • RockartJFChief executives define their own data needsHarvard Bus Rev19795728193
  • Rogger A, Heck U ( 2004 ). Knowledge Management for e-Service-Delivery—A Conceptual approach within e-Government . Fifth working conference on Knowledge Management in E-Government (KMGov2004) . IFIP WG8.3/8.5, University of Linz, Krems, Austria, May 17—19 .
  • RothAVGaimonCKrajewskiLOptimal acquisition of FMS technology subject to technological progressDecision Sci199122230833410.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00349.x
  • SaatyTLThe Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning priority setting resource allocation1980
  • ScarbroughHMaking the matrix matter: Strategic information systems in financial servicesJ Mngt Stud2003342171190
  • SchoemakerPJHScenario planning: A tool for strategic thinkingSloan Mngt Rev19953622540
  • StewartRAMohamedSEvaluating web-based project information management in construction: Capturing the long-term value creation processAutomat Constr200413446947010.1016/j.autcon.2004.01.003
  • VoropajevVChange management—A key integrative function of PM in transition economiesInt J Project Mngt1997161151910.1016/S0263-7863(97)00010-0
  • YingFYLowSPWangSQLimHKey project management practices affecting Singaporean firms' project performance in ChinaInt J Project Mngt2009271597110.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.004
  • ZimmererTYasinMYA leadership profile of American project managersProject Mngt J19982913138

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.