676
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue Paper

Problem-structuring methods and project management: an example of stakeholder involvement using Hierarchical Process Modelling methodology

, &
Pages 893-904 | Received 01 Mar 2009, Accepted 14 Apr 2010, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • AchterkampMCVosJFJCritically identifying stakeholders—Evaluating boundary critique as a vehicle for stakeholder identificationSyst Res Behav Sci200724131410.1002/sres.760
  • AckermannFEdenCUsing causal mapping with group support systems to elicit an understanding of failure in complex projects: Some implications for organizational researchGroup Decis Negot200514535537610.1007/s10726-005-8917-6
  • AckermannFEdenCWilliamsTModeling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approachesInterfaces1997272486510.1287/inte.27.2.48
  • AckermannFEdenCWilliamsTHowickSSystemic risk assessment: A case studyJ Opl Res Soc2007581395110.1057/palgrave.jors.2602105
  • Anderson DK and Merna T ( 2003 ). Project Management Strategy-project management represented as a process based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy . Int J Proj Mngt 21 : 387–393 .
  • ArituaBSmithNJBowerDConstruction client multi-projects—A complex adaptive systems perspectiveInt J Proj Mngt2009271727910.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.005
  • Atkinson R, Crawford L and Ward S ( 2006 ). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management . Int J Proj Mngt 24 : 687–698 .
  • Augustine S ( 2005 ). Managing Agile Projects . Upper Saddle River, NJ ; London: Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference .
  • BeerSCybernetics and Management1959
  • BeerSThe Heart of Enterprise1979
  • BlockleyDProcess modelling from reflective practice for engineering qualityCiv Eng Environ Syst199916428731310.1080/02630259908970268
  • ChecklandPSolving problem solving: A potent force for effective managementJ Opl Res Soc199849910141015
  • ChecklandPSoft Systems Methodology: A 30-year Retrospective; and, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice1999
  • ChecklandPWinterMProcess and content: Two ways of using SSMJ Opl Res Soc200657121435144110.1057/palgrave.jors.2602118
  • Chin G ( 2004 ). Agile Project Management: How to Succeed in the Face of Changing Project Requirements . AMACOM: New York .
  • Crawford L, Costello T, Pollack J and Bentley L ( 2003 ). Managing soft change projects in the public sector . Int J Proj Mngt 21: 443–448 .
  • DavisJPHallJWAssembling uncertain evidence for decision makingHydroinformatics '9819981 and 210891094
  • DavisJPHallJWA software-supported process for assembling evidence and handling uncertainty in decision-makingDecis Support Syst200335341543310.1016/S0167-9236(02)00117-3
  • Davis JP, MacDonald ADJ and Maharashi SE ( 2007 ). Integrated performance measurement to support strategic decision making in engineering organisations . 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Vols. 1–4, IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 1762–1766.
  • DempsterAPUpper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mappingAnn Math Stat196738232533910.1214/aoms/1177698950
  • Dennis A and Gallupe RB ( 1993 ). A history of group support system empirical research: Lessons learned and future directions. In: LM Jessup and JS Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems New Perspectives, Macmillan: New York, pp 59–77 .
  • de VreedeGJDicksonGUsing GSS to design organizational processes and information systems: An action research study on collaborative business engineeringGroup Decis Negot20009216118310.1023/A:1008758806144
  • de VreedeGJNiedermanFPaarlbergITowards an instrument to measure participants' perceptions on facilitation in group support systems meetingsGroup Decis Negot200211212714410.1023/A:1015225811547
  • EdenCAckermannFMaking Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management1998
  • EdenCRadfordJETackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support1990
  • EdenCWilliamsTAckermannFHowickSThe role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projectsJ Opl Res Soc200051329130010.1057/palgrave.jors.2600919
  • EspejoRIHarndenRThe Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM1989
  • HallJWBlockleyDIDavisJPUncertain inference using interval probability theoryInt J Approx Reason1998193–424726410.1016/S0888-613X(98)10010-5
  • HameriA-PHeikkilaJImproving efficiency: Time-critical interfacing of project tasksInt J Proj Mngt200220214310.1016/S0263-7863(00)00044-2
  • HighsmithJAAgile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products2004
  • HowickSEdenCThe impact of disruption and delay when compressing large projects: Going for incentives?J Opl Res Soc2001521263410.1057/palgrave.jors.2601045
  • HowickSEdenCLearning in disrupted projects: On the nature of corporate and personal learningInt J Prod Res200745122775279710.1080/00207540600774083
  • HowickSAckermannFAndersenDLinking event thinking with structural thinking: Methods to improve client value in projectsSyst Dynam Rev200622211314010.1002/sdr.332
  • JacksonMCSocial-theory and operational-research practiceJ Opl Res Soc199344656357710.1057/jors.1993.98
  • JacksonMCCritical systems thinking and practiceEur J Opl Res2001128223324410.1016/S0377-2217(00)00067-9
  • JacksonMCSystems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers2003
  • JacksonMCBeyond problem structuring methods: Reinventing the future of OR/MSJ Opl Res Soc200657786887810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602093
  • KeysPOperational-research in organizations—A metaphorical analysisJ Opl Res Soc199142643544610.1057/jors.1991.92
  • KoestlerAThe Ghost in the Machine :Danube edn/with a new postscript [by the author]1976
  • KoskelaLBallardAShould project management be based on theories of economics or production?Build Res Inf200634215416310.1080/09613210500491480
  • KumaraswamyMMNgSTUgwuOOPalaneeswaranERahmanMMEmpowering collaborative decisions in complex construction project scenariosEng Constr Archit Mngt200411213314210.1108/09699980410527876
  • LuttererWSystemics: The social aspects of cyberneticsKybernetes2005343–449750710.1108/03684920510581684
  • LyneisJMFordDNSystem dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future researchSyst Dynam Rev2007232–315718910.1002/sdr.377
  • MarashiEDavisJPA systems-based approach for supporting discourse in decision makingComput-Aided Civ Inf200722751152610.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00507.x
  • Mawby D and Stupples D ( 2002 ). Systems thinking for managing projects . Iemc-2002: IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Vols I and II, Proceedings, IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, pp 344–349 .
  • Minarro-ViserasEBainesTSweeneyMKey success factors when implementing strategic manufacturing initiativesInt J Opns Prod Mngt200525215117910.1108/01443570510577010
  • MingersJSystems typologies in the light of autopoiesis: A reconceptualization of Boulding's hierarchy, and a typology of self-referential systemsSyst Res Behav Sci199714530331310.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199709/10)14:5<303::AID-SRES161>3.0.CO;2-A
  • Mingers J and Rosenhead J ( eds ) ( 2001 ). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, 2nd edn . Wiley: Chichester .
  • MingersJRosenheadJProblem structuring methods in actionEur J Opl Res2004152353055410.1016/S0377-2217(03)00056-0
  • MorganGImages of Organisation2006
  • MorinEComplexityInt Soc Sci J1974264555582
  • MorinEFrom the concept of system to the paradigm of complexityJ Soc Evol Syst199215437138510.1016/1061-7361(92)90024-8
  • MorinEOrganization and complexityAnn Ny Acad Sci199987911512110.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb10410.x
  • MorrisPWGThe Management of Projects1997
  • NechanskyHElements of a cybernetic epistemology: Decisions, control and principles of societal organisationKybernetes2008371–2839310.1108/03684920810851005
  • NunamakerJFVogelDKonsynskiBRInteraction of task and technology to support large groupsDecis Support Syst1989513915210.1016/0167-9236(89)90003-1
  • NunamakerJBriggsROMittlemanDDVogelDRBathazardPALessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findingsJ Mngt Inform Syst199713316320710.1080/07421222.1996.11518138
  • Olsson R ( Writer ) ( 2007 ). In search of opportunity management: Is the risk management process enough? Int J Proj Mngt 25 : 745–752 .
  • Pidd M ( 2007 ). Making sure you tackle the right problem: Linking hard and soft methods in simulation practice . Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1–5, IEEE, Piscataway, NY, pp 183–192 .
  • PintoMBPintoJKPrescottJEAntecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperationMngt Sci199339101281129710.1287/mnsc.39.10.1281
  • PotocanVMulejMKajzerSBusiness cybernetics: A provocative suggestionKybernetes2005349–101496151610.1108/03684920510614786
  • Remus U and Schub S ( 2003 ). A blueprint for the implementation of process-oriented knowledge management . Knowl Process Mngt 10 : 237–253 .
  • Robertson S and Williams T ( 2006 ). Understanding project failure: Using cognitive mapping in an insurance project . Proj Mngt J 37 : 55–71 .
  • Schindler M and Eppler MJ ( 2003 ). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors . Int J Proj Mngt 21 : 219–228 .
  • Shaw D, Ackerman F and Eden C ( 2001 ). Sharing ideas in groups: A research report on electronic group brainstorming for real-world workshops . Aston Business School Research Institute: Birmingham, UK .
  • Shaw D, Eden C and Ackerman F ( 2002 ). Evaluating Group Support Systems: Improving Brainstorming Research Methodology . Aston Business School Research Institute: Birmingham, UK .
  • ShawDAckermannFEdenCApproaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuringJ Opl Res Soc200354993694810.1057/palgrave.jors.2601581
  • ShenharAJOne size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domainsMngt Sci200147339441410.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772
  • Smith J, Love P and Heywood C ( 2005 ). A method for performance briefing at the project inception stage . Facilities 23 : 319–329 .
  • Smith J, Wyatt R and Love P ( 2008 ). Key decision-making attributes for project inception . Facilities 26 : 289–309 .
  • StephensJRHaslettTFrom cybernetics and VSD to management and actionSyst Prac Act Res200518439540710.1007/s11213-005-7170-x
  • TavaresLVA review of the contribution of Operational Research to Project ManagementEur J Opl Res2002136111810.1016/S0377-2217(01)00097-2
  • TeigenKHStudies in subjective probability IV: Probabilities, confidence, and luckScand J Psychol198324317519110.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00490.x
  • Tuggle FD and Goldfinger WE ( 2004 ). A methodology for mining embedded knowledge from process maps . Hum Syst Mngt 23 : 1–13 .
  • TurnerRThe Handbook of Project-based Management: Improving the Processes for Achieving Strategic Objectives1999
  • van den HerikKWde VreedeGJExperiences with facilitating policy meetings with group support systemsInt J Technol Mngt2000193–5246268
  • WeickKEMaking Sense of the Organisation2001
  • WhiteLEvaluating problem-structuring methods: Developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMsJ Opl Res Soc200657784285510.1057/palgrave.jors.2602149
  • WhiteLUnderstanding problem structuring methods interventionsEur J Opl Res2009199382383310.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.066
  • WilliamsTTowards realism in network simulationOmega-Int J Mngt Sci199927330531410.1016/S0305-0483(98)00062-0
  • WilliamsTModelling Complex Projects2002
  • WilliamsTHow do organisations learn lessons from projects—And do they?IEEE T Eng Mngt200855224826610.1109/TEM.2007.912920
  • WilliamsTEdenCAckermannFTaitAThe effects of design changes and delays on project costsJ Opl Res Soc199546780981810.1057/jors.1995.114
  • Williams T, Eden C and Ackermann F ( 2001 ). The use of project post-mortems . Project Management Institute (PMI) Annual Symposium, Nashville, TN. PMI: Newton Square, PA .
  • WilliamsTAckermannFEdenCStructuring a delay and disruption claim: An application of cause-mapping and system dynamicsEur J Opl Res2003148119220410.1016/S0377-2217(02)00372-7
  • WinterMProblem structuring in project management: An application of soft systems methodology (SSM)J Opl Res Soc200657780281210.1057/palgrave.jors.2602050
  • WinterMChecklandPSoft systems: A fresh perspective for project managementP I Civil Eng-Civ Eng20031564187192
  • YusufYYGunasekaranAAdeleyeEOSivayoganathanKAgile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectivesEur J Opl Res2004159237939210.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.022

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.