263
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Paper

Does AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluation

, &
Pages 1801-1812 | Received 01 Oct 2009, Accepted 01 Aug 2010, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • AhnBChoiSERP system selection using a simulation-based AHP approach: A case of Korean homeshopping companyJ Opl Res Soc20075932233010.1057/palgrave.jors.2602365
  • AkarteMSurendraNRaviBRangarajNWeb based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy processJ Opl Res Soc20015251152210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601124
  • Al-ShemmeriTAl-KloubBPearmanAModel choice in multicriteria decision aidEur J Opl Res19979755056010.1016/S0377-2217(96)00277-9
  • Bana e CostaCVansnickJA critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHPEur J Opl Res20081871422142810.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022
  • BanuelasRAntonyJApplication of stochastic analytic hierarchy process within a domestic appliance manufacturerJ Opl Res Soc200658293810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602060
  • Barzilai J (2001). Notes on the analytic hierarchy process. Proceedings of the NSF Design and Manufacturing Research Conference, http://scientificmetrics.com/downloads/publications/Barzilai_2001_Notes_on_the_Analytic_Hierarchy_Process.pdf.
  • BeckerGMDe GrootMHMarschakJMeasuring utility by a single-response sequential methodBehav Sci1964922623210.1002/bs.3830090304
  • BeilRLaboratory experimentation in economic research: An introduction to psychologists and marketersPsychol & Mark19961333134010.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199607)13:4<331::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-B
  • BeltonVGearAOn a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytical hierarchiesOmega19831122823010.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6
  • BrughaCRelative measurement and the power functionEur J Opl Res200012162764010.1016/S0377-2217(99)00057-0
  • BrughaCPhased multicriteria preference findingEur J Opl Res200415830831610.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.006
  • CallaghanCGabrielASaintyBReview and classification of experimental economics research in accountingJ Acc Lit20062559126
  • CrosonRDonohueKExperimental economics and supply chain managementInterfaces2002325748210.1287/inte.32.5.74.37
  • DoddFDoneganHComparison of priotization techniques using interhierarchy mappingsJ Opl Res Soc19954649249810.1057/jors.1995.67
  • DoneganHDoddFMcMasterTA new approach to AHP decision-makingStatistician19924129530210.2307/2348551
  • DyerJRemarks on the analytic hierarchy processMngt Sci19903624925810.1287/mnsc.36.3.249
  • FormanEGassSThe analytic hierarchy process—An expositionOpns Res20014946948610.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231
  • FukuyamaHWeberWEvaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functionsJ Opl Res Soc200253992100310.1057/palgrave.jors.2601417
  • GoldenBWasilEHarkerPThe Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies1989
  • GuitouniAMartelJ-MTentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA methodEur J Opl Res199810950152110.1016/S0377-2217(98)00073-3
  • GuitouniABélangerMMartelJ-MUne typologie des méthodes multicritères: Proposition d'un cadre méthodologiqueINFOR200745153174
  • HoWIntegrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—A literature reviewEur J Opl Res200818621122810.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
  • HobbsBMeierPMulticriteria methods for resource planning: An experimental comparisonIEEE T Power Syst199491811181710.1109/59.331435
  • HolderRResponse to holder’s comments on the analytic hierarchy process: Response to the responseJ Opl Res Soc19914291491810.1057/jors.1991.177
  • HuizinghEVrolijkHExtending the applicability of the analytic hierarchy processSocio Econ Plan Sci1997311293910.1016/S0038-0121(96)00025-0
  • IshizakaALabibAAnalytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitationsOR Insight20092220122010.1057/ori.2009.10
  • JohnsonCBeineWWangTRight-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedureJ Math Psychol197919616410.1016/0022-2496(79)90005-1
  • KarlanDUsing experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisionsAm Econ Rev2005951688169910.1257/000282805775014407
  • KeeneyRVon WinterfeldtDEppelTEliciting public values for complex policy decisionsMngt Sci1990361011103010.1287/mnsc.36.9.1011
  • KorhonenPTopdagiHPerformance of the AHP in comparison of gains and lossesMath Comput Model20033775776610.1016/S0895-7177(03)00083-9
  • KornyshovaESalinesiCSelecting MCDM techniques: State of the artProceedings of the International IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multicriteria Decision Making20072229
  • KumarSVaidyaOAnalytic hierarchy process: An overview of applicationsEur J Opl Res200616912910.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
  • LeeCKwakNInformation resource planning for a health-care system using an AHP-based goal programming methodJ Opl Res Soc1999501191119810.1057/palgrave.jors.2600821
  • LeungLLamKCaoDImplementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network processJ Opl Res Soc20055768269110.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040
  • LiXBeullensPJonesDTamizMAn integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in ChinaJ Opl Res Soc20086033033810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602565
  • LiberatoreMNydickRThe analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature reviewEur J Opl Res200818919420710.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
  • LinaresPAre inconsistent decisions better? An experiment with pairwise comparisonsEur J Opl Res200919349249810.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.030
  • MilletIThe effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation methods in the analytic hierarchy processJ Multi-Criteria Decis Anal19976415110.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<41::AID-MCDA122>3.0.CO;2-D
  • MingersJLiuWMengWUsing SSM to structure the identification of inputs and outputs in DEAJ Opl Res Soc20076016817910.1057/palgrave.jors.2602542
  • OmkarprasadVSushilKAnalytic hierarchy process: An overview of applicationsEur J Opl Res200616912910.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
  • PöyhönenMHämäläinenRSaloAAn experiment on the numerical modelling of verbal ratio statementsJ Multi-Criteria Decis Anal1997611010.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<1::AID-MCDA111>3.0.CO;2-W
  • SaatyTA scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJ Math Psychol19771523428110.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  • SaatyTThe Analytic Hierarchy Process1980
  • SaatyTMaking and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANPJ Syst Sci Syst Eng20051413610.1007/s11518-006-0179-6
  • SaatyTRank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processesEur J Opl Res200616855757010.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.032
  • SaatyTThere is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the analytic hierarchy processJ Syst Sci Syst Eng20061545746410.1007/s11518-006-5021-7
  • SaatyTFormanEThe Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies1992
  • SaloAHämäläinenROn the measurement of preference in the analytic hierarchy processJ Multi-Criteria Decis Anal1997630931910.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2
  • ShaDCheZSupply chain network design: Partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic modelJ Opl Res Soc200557526210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601949
  • ShimJBibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)Socio Econ Plan Sci198923316116710.1016/0038-0121(89)90013-X
  • SimpsonLDo decision makers know what they prefer?: MAVT and ELECTRE IIJ Opl Res Soc19964791992910.1057/jors.1996.117
  • SturmBWeimannJExperiments in environmental economics and some close relativesJ Econ Surv20062041945710.1111/j.0950-0804.2006.00285.x
  • TavanaMA priority assessment multi-criteria decision model for human spaceflight mission planning at NASAJ Opl Res Soc2005571197121510.1057/palgrave.jors.2602107
  • VargasLAn overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applicationsEur J Opl Res1990482810.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  • WebberSApostolouBHassellJThe sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentationsEur J Opl Res19969635136210.1016/S0377-2217(96)00081-1
  • WheelerSAn analysis of combined arms teaming for the Australian defence forceJ Opl Res Soc2005571279128810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602104
  • WhitakerRValidation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network processMath Comput Model20074684085910.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.018
  • YeoGSongDDinwoodieJRoeMWeighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interestsJ Opl Res Soc2010611249125710.1057/jors.2009.88
  • YükselIDagdevirenMUsing the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis—A case study for a textile firmInform Sci20071773364338210.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001
  • ZahediFThe analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applicationsInterface19861649610810.1287/inte.16.4.96

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.