Search in:

Advanced search

Journal of the Operational Research Society Volume 62, 2011 - Issue 4

Submit an article Journal homepage

286

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Theoretical Paper

Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP

A IshizakaUniversity of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business SchoolPortsmouthUK

D BalkenborgDepartment of EconomicsUniversity of Exeter Business SchoolRennes DriveUK

T KaplanDepartment of EconomicsUniversity of Exeter Business SchoolRennes DriveUK

Pages 700-710 | Received 01 Aug 2008, Accepted 01 Jan 2010, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.23

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Reprints & Permissions

References

AhnBSChoiSHERP system selection using a simulation-based AHP approach: A case of Korean home shopping companyJ Opl Res Soc200859332233010.1057/palgrave.jors.2602365
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AkarteMMSurendraNVRaviBRangarajNWeb based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy processJ Opl Res Soc20015251152210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601124
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BañuelasRAntonyJApplication of stochastic analytic hierarchy process within a domestic appliance manufacturerJ Opl Res Soc2007581293810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602060
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BarzilaiJDeriving weights from pairwise comparison matricesJ Opl Res Soc199748121226123210.1057/palgrave.jors.2600474
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BarzilaiJGolanyBAHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rulesInf Sys and Opl Res19943225764
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BeltonVGearTOn a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchiesOmega19831122823010.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DyerJSRemarks on the analytic hierarchy processMngt Sci199036324925810.1287/mnsc.36.3.249
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FormanEHGassSIThe analytic hierarchy process—An expositionOpns Res200149446948610.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FukuyamaHWeberWLEvaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functionsJ Opl Res Soc2002539992100310.1057/palgrave.jors.2601417
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GoldenBLWasilEAHarkerPTThe Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies1989
Google Scholar
HarkerPTVargasLGThe theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy processMngt Sci198733111383140310.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HarkerPTVargasLGReply to ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process'Mngt Sci199036326927310.1287/mnsc.36.3.269
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HoWIntegrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—A literature reviewEur J Opl Res2008186121122810.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HolderRDSome comment on the analytic hierarchy processJ Opl Res Soc199041111073107610.1057/jors.1990.167
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HolderRDResponse to Holder's comments on the analytic hierarchy process: Response to the responseJ Opl Res Soc1991421091491810.1057/jors.1991.177
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ishizaka A (2004a). The advantages of clusters and pivots in AHP. Proceeding 15th Mini-Euro Conference MUDSM (CD-Rom) ISBN 972-9044-52-X.
Google Scholar
Ishizaka A (2004b). Développement d'un système tutorial intelligent pour dériver des priorités dans l'AHP. PhD Thesis, University of Basle. Dissertation.de: Berlin..
Google Scholar
IshizakaALustiMHow to derive priorities in AHP: A comparative studyCent Eur J Opns Res200614438740010.1007/s10100-006-0012-9
Google Scholar
LeeCWKwakNKInformation resource planning for a health-care system using an AHP-based goal programming methodJ Opl Res Soc199950121191119810.1057/palgrave.jors.2600821
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LeskinenPKangasJRank reversals in multi-criteria decision analysis with statistical modelling of ratio-scale pairwise comparisonsJ Opl Res Soc2005561285586110.1057/palgrave.jors.2601925
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LeungLCLamKCCaoDImplementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network processJ Opl Res Soc200657668269110.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiXBeullensPJonesDTamizMAn integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in ChinaJ Opl Res Soc20096033033810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602565
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiberatoreMJNydickRLThe analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature reviewEur J Opl Res2008189119420710.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LootsmaFAConflict resolution via pairwise comparison of concessionsEur J Opl Res198940110911610.1016/0377-2217(89)90278-6
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LootsmaFAMenschTCAVosFAMulti-criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long-term research planningEur J Opl Res199047329330510.1016/0377-2217(90)90216-X
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LootsmaFAScale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMARTJ Multi-criteria Decis Anal1993228711010.1002/mcda.4020020205
Google Scholar
Ma D and Zheng X (1991). 9/9-9/1 Scale method of AHP. 2nd Proceeding Int. Symposium on AHP, Vol. 1, University of Pittsburgh; Pittsburgh, PA, pp 197–202.
Google Scholar
MingersJLiuWWengWUsing SSM to structure the identification of inputs and outputs in DEAJ Opl Res Soc20096016817910.1057/palgrave.jors.2602542
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PöyhönenMAHämäläinenRPSaloAAAn experiment on the numerical modelling of verbal ratio statementsJ Multi-criteria Decis Anal19976111010.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<1::AID-MCDA111>3.0.CO;2-W
Google Scholar
SaatyTLA scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJ Math Psychol197715323428110.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SaatyTLThe Analytic Hierarchy Process1980
Google Scholar
SaatyTLAn exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process'Mngt Sci199036325926810.1287/mnsc.36.3.259
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SaatyTLResponse to Holder's comments on the analytic hierarchy processJ Opl Res Soc1991421090992910.1057/jors.1991.176
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SaatyTLVargasLGComparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratiosMath Modelling19845530932410.1016/0270-0255(84)90008-3
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SaloAAHämäläinenRPOn the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy processJ Multi-criteria Decis Anal19976630931910.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2
Google Scholar
ShaDYCheZHSupply chain network design: Partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic modelJ Opl Res Soc2006571526210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601949
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
StamADuarte SilvaPOn multiplicative priority rating methods for AHPEur J Opl Res200314519210810.1016/S0377-2217(02)00228-X
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TavanaMA priority assessment multi-criteria decision model for human spaceflight mission planning at NASAJ Opl Res Soc200657101197121510.1057/palgrave.jors.2602107
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TriantaphyllouETwo new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHPJ Multi-criteria Decis Anal2001101112510.1002/mcda.284
Google Scholar
TriantaphyllouEBaigKThe impact of aggregating benefit and cost criteria in four MCDA methodsIEEE T Eng Mngt200552221322610.1109/TEM.2005.845221
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VaidyaOKumarSAnalytic hierarchy process: An overview of applicationsEur J Opl Res2006169112910.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VargasLGAn overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applicationsEur J Opl Res19904812810.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VargasLGComments on Barzilai and Lootsma: Why the multiplicative AHP is invalid: A practical counterexampleJ Multi-criteria Decis Anal19976416917010.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199705)6:3<169::AID-MCDA134>3.0.CO;2-P
Google Scholar
WheelerSAn analysis of combined arms teaming for the Australian defence forceJ Opl Res Soc200657111279128810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602104
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WinklerRDecision modeling and rational choice: AHP and utility theoryMngt Sci199036324724810.1287/mnsc.36.3.247
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Yeo G-T, Song D-W, Dinwoodie J, Roe M (2009). Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests. J Opl Res Soc, advance online publication, doi: 10.1057/jors.2009.88.
Google Scholar
ZahediFThe analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applicationsInterface19861649610810.1287/inte.16.4.96
Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date