References
- BrundtlandGOur Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development1987
- CarrollABA three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performanceAcad Mngt Rev19794497505
- Commission of the European Communities (2001). Brussels COM (2001) 366. Commission Regulation 68/2001.
- DeeganCThe legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundationAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal200215281311
- DeegenTAnsatzpunkte zur Integration von Umweltaspekten in die ‘Balanced Scorecard’2001
- EisenhardtKMBetter stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logicAcad Mngt Rev199116620627
- EpsteinMJMeasuring Corporate Environmental Performance: Best Practices for Costing and Managing an Effective Environmental Strategy1996
- EpsteinMJRoyMJSustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance driversLong Range Plann20013458560410.1016/S0024-6301(01)00084-X
- FiggeFHahnTSchalteggerSWagnerMSustainability Balanced Scorecard (Wertorientiertes Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement mit der Balanced Scorecard)2001
- FiggeFHahnTSchalteggerSWagnerMThe sustainability balanced scorecard—A tool foe value-oriented sustainability management in strategy focused organisationsConference Proceedings of the 2001 Eco-Management and Auditing Conference20018390
- FiggeFHahnTSchalteggerSWagnerMThe sustainability balanced scorecard—Linking sustainability management to business strategyBus Strat Environ20021126928410.1002/bse.339
- FreemanREStrategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach1984
- Friedman M (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Magazine. 13 September 1970.
- GriffinJJMahonJFThe corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable researchBus Soc199736153110.1177/000765039703600102
- JohnsonSDIdentification and selection of environmental performance indicators: Application of the balanced scorecard approachCorporate Environmental Strategy19985354110.1016/S1066-7938(00)80079-2
- KaplanRSNortonDPTranslating Strategy into Action—The Balanced Scorecard1996
- KaplanRNortonDThe Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment2001
- LantosGPThe boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibilityJ Consum Market20011859563010.1108/07363760110410281
- MaignanIConsumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparisonJ Bus Ethics200130577210.1023/A:1006433928640
- MooreGCorporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the UK supermarket industryJ Bus Ethics20013416718010.1023/A:1012537016969
- OrlitzkyMDoes firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance?J Bus Ethics20013316718010.1023/A:1017516826427
- RufBMMuralidharKBrownRMJanneyJJPaulKAn empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspectiveJ Bus Ethics20013214315610.1023/A:1010786912118
- SimpsonWGKohersTThe link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industryJ Bus Ethics2002359710910.1023/A:1013082525900
- SmithNCCorporate social responsibility: Whether or how?Calif Mngt Rev200345527610.2307/41166188
- WalshamGInterpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and methodEur J Inform Syst19954748110.1057/ejis.1995.9
- YinRKCase Study Research—Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods1994
- YinRKThe abridged version of case study researchHandbook of Applied Social Research Methods1998229259