Search in:

Advanced search

Journal of the Operational Research Society Volume 63, 2012 - Issue 8

Submit an article Journal homepage

113

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

General Paper

DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation

Y-M WangFuzhou UniversityFuzhouPRChinaCorrespondence[email protected]

K-S ChinCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong

S WangThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Pages 1079-1088 | Received 01 Jan 2011, Accepted 01 Aug 2011, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.116

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Reprints & Permissions

References

AndersenPPetersenNCA procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysisManagement Science1993391261126410.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AndersonTRHollingsworthKInmanLThe fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation modelJournal of Productivity Analysis20021724925510.1023/A:1015012121760
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BakerPCTalluriSA closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selectionComputers & Industrial Engineering19973210110810.1016/S0360-8352(96)00199-4
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BaoCPChenTHChangSYSlack-based ranking method: An interpretation to the cross-efficiency method in DEAJournal of the Operational Research Society20085986086210.1057/palgrave.jors.2602411
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CharnesACooperWWRhodesEMeasuring the efficiency of decision making unitsEuropean Journal of Operational Research1978242944410.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChenTYAn assessment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in Taiwan's electricity distribution sectorEuropean Journal of Operational Research200213742143310.1016/S0377-2217(01)00101-1
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CooperWWRuizJLSirventIChoosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEAEuropean Journal of Operational Research200718044345810.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.037
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DoyleJGreenREfficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and usesJournal of the Operational Research Society19944556757810.1057/jors.1994.84
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DoyleJRGreenRHCross-evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUsINFOR199533205222
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ErtayTRuanDData envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMSEuropean Journal of Operational Research200516480081010.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.038
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GreenRHDoyleJRCookWDPreference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluationEuropean Journal of Operational Research19969046147210.1016/0377-2217(95)00039-9
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JahanshahlooGRLotfiFHJafariYMaddahiRSelecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluationApplied Mathematical Modelling20113554454910.1016/j.apm.2010.07.020
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KaoCHungHTData envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approachJournal of the Operational Research Society2005561196120310.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LamKFIn the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEAJournal of the Operational Research Society20106113414310.1057/jors.2008.138
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiangLWuJCookWDZhuJAlternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluationInternational Journal of Production Economics20081131025103010.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.006
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiangLWuJCookWDZhuJThe DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibriumOperations Research2008561278128810.1287/opre.1070.0487
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LuWMLoSFA closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in ChinaEuropean Journal of Operational Research200718388289410.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.027
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LuWMLoSFA benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in ChinaJournal of the Operational Research Society20075884184910.1057/palgrave.jors.2602229
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
OralMKettaniOLangPA methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projectsManagement Science19913787188510.1287/mnsc.37.7.871
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RamónNRuizJLSirventIOn the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research20102071564157210.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.022
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RamónNRuizJLSirventIReducing differences between profiles of weights: A ‘peer-restricted’ cross-efficiency evaluationOmega20113963464110.1016/j.omega.2011.01.004
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SextonTRSilkmanRHHoganAJData envelopment analysis: critique and extensionsMeasuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis1986
Google Scholar
ShangJSueyoshiTA unified framework for the selection of flexible manufacturing systemEuropean Journal of Operational Research19958529731510.1016/0377-2217(94)00041-A
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SunSAssessing computer numerical control machines using data envelopment analysisInternational Journal of Production Research2002402011203910.1080/00207540210123634
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SunSLuWMA cross-efficiency profiling for increasing discrimination in Data Envelopment AnalysisINFOR2005435160
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TalluriSSarkisJExtensions in efficiency measurement of alternate machine component grouping solutions via data envelopment analysisIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management19974429930410.1109/17.618171
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TofallisCImproving discernment in DEA using profilingOmega19962436136410.1016/0305-0483(95)00065-8
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TofallisCInput efficiency profiling: An application to airlinesComputers & Operations Research19972425325810.1016/S0305-0548(96)00067-6
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WangYMChinKSA neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extensionExpert Systems with Applications2010373666367510.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.024
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WangYMChinKSSome alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluationInternational Journal of Production Economics201012833233810.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.032
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WangYMChinKSThe use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregationOmega20113949350310.1016/j.omega.2010.10.007
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WongYHBBeasleyJERestricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJournal of the Operational Research Society19904182983510.1057/jors.1990.120
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuDPerformance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research200919422723510.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.009
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuJLiangLWuDYangFOlympics ranking and benchmarking based on cross efficiency evaluation method and cluster analysis: The case of Sydney 2000International Journal of Enterprise Network Management2008237739210.1504/IJENM.2008.020640
Google Scholar
WuJLiangLYangFYanHBargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making unitsExpert Systems with Applications2008364357436210.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.001
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuJLiangLZhaYYangFDetermination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluationExpert Systems with Applications2008364826482910.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.042
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuJLiangLZhaYCDetermination of the weights of ultimate cross efficiency based on the solution of nucleolus in cooperative gameSystems Engineering—Theory & Practice200828929710.1016/S1874-8651(09)60023-5
Google Scholar
WuJLiangLChenYDEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankingsOmega20093790991810.1016/j.omega.2008.07.001
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuJLiangLYangFAchievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation methodEuropean Journal of Operational Research200919772273010.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.030
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuJLiangLYangFDetermination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative gameExpert Systems with Applications20093687287610.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.006
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuJLiangLZhaYCPreference voting and ranking using DEA game cross efficiency modelJournal of the Operations Research Society of Japan200952105111
Google Scholar
YuMMTingSCChenMCEvaluating the cross-efficiency of information sharing in supply chainsExpert Systems with Applications2010372891289710.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.048
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date