References
- AlbizuriMJThe multichoice coalition valueAnnals of Operations Research2009172136337410.1007/s10479-009-0634-0
- AlbizuriMJLaruelleAAn axiomatization of successSocial Choice and Welfare201341114515510.1007/s00355-012-0671-5
- AllinghamMGEconomic power and values of gamesZeitschrift für Nationalökonomie19753529329910.1007/BF01284617
- Alonso-MeijideJMFiestras-JaneiroMGModification of the Banzhaf value for games with a coalition structureAnnals of Operations Research20021091–421322710.1023/A:1016356303622
- BanzhafJFWeighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysisRutgers Law Review196519317343
- BarlowREProschanFImportance of system components and fault tree eventsStochastic Processes and their Applications19753215317210.1016/0304-4149(75)90013-7
- BarryBIs it better to be powerful or lucky? Part iPolitical Studies198028218319410.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb01244.x
- BarryBIs it better to be powerful or lucky? Part iiPolitical Studies198028333835210.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb00473.x
- BramsSJLakeMPower and satisfaction in a representative democracyGame Theory and Political Science1978529562
- CarrerasFα-Decisiveness in simple gamesTheory and Decision2004561–2779110.1007/s11238-004-5637-3
- CarrerasFA decisiveness index for simple gamesEuropean Journal of Operational Research2005163237038710.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.041
- Carreras F and Freixas J (1999). Some theoretical reasons for using regular semivalues. In: De Swart H (ed). Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice. Proceedings of the International Conference, LGS, Tilburg University Press: Tilburg, the Netherlands, pp 140–154.
- CarrerasFFreixasJSemivalue versatility and applicationsAnnals of Operations Research20021091–4341356
- ColemanJSControl of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to actSocial Choice1971269300
- ColemanJSCombinatorics: Individual Interests and Collective Action: Selected Essays1986
- Diffo LamboLMoulenJOrdinal equivalence of power notions in voting gamesTheory and Decision200253431332510.1023/A:1024158301610
- DubeyPOn the uniqueness of the Shapley valueInternational Journal of Game Theory19754313113910.1007/BF01780630
- DubeyPShapleyLSMathematical properties of the Banzhaf power indexMathematics of Operations Research1979429913110.1287/moor.4.2.99
- FeltkampVAlternative axiomatic characterizations of the Shapley and the Banzhaf valuesInternational Journal of Game Theory199524217918610.1007/BF01240041
- FreixasJBounds for the Owen’s multilinear extensionJournal of Applied Probability200744485286410.1017/S0021900200003582
- FreixasJOn ordinal equivalence of the Shapley and Banzhaf values for cooperative gamesInternational Journal of Game Theory201039451352710.1007/s00182-009-0179-0
- FreixasJPonsMTwo measures of circumstantial power: Influences and bribesHomo Oeconomicus2005224569588
- FreixasJPonsMCircumstantial power: Optimal persuadable votersEuropean Journal of Operational Research200818631114112610.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.045
- KöningTBräuningerTThe inclusiveness of European decision rulesJournal of Theoretical Politics199810112514210.1177/0951692898010001006
- KuoWZuoMJOptimal Reliability Modeling: Principles and Applications2003
- LaruelleAValencianoFAssessing success and decisiveness in voting situationsSocial Choice and Welfare200524117119710.1007/s00355-003-0298-7
- LaruelleAValencianoFVoting and Collective Decision-Making2008
- OwenGMultilinear extensions of gamesManagement Science1972185647910.1287/mnsc.18.5.64
- PenroseLSThe elementary statistics of majority votingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society19461091535710.2307/2981392
- PongouRTchantchoBDiffo LamboLPolitical influence in multichoice institutions: Cyclicity, anonymity and transitivityTheory and Decision201170215717810.1007/s11238-010-9211-x
- RaeDDecision rules and individual values in constitutional choiceAmerican Political Science Review1969631405610.1017/S0003055400261467
- RothAEIntroduction to the Shapley valueThe Shapley Value. Essays in Honor of L.S. Shapley1988127
- ShapleyLSA value for n-person gamesContributions to the Theory of Games II1953307317
- ShapleyLSShubikMA method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee systemAmerican Political Science Review195448378779210.2307/1951053
- StraffinPDDavisMDBramsSJPower and satisfaction in an ideologically divided voting bodyPower, Voting and Voting Power1982239253
- TaylorADZwickerWSSimple games: Desirability Relations, Trading, and Pseudoweightings1999
- TchantchoBDiffo LamboLPongouRMbama EngoulouBVoters’ power in voting games with abstention: Influence relation and ordinal equivalence of power theoriesGames and Economic Behavior200864133535010.1016/j.geb.2007.10.014