60
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Towards interoperable and composable trajectory simulations: an ontology-based approach

, , &
Pages 217-229 | Received 15 Mar 2010, Accepted 25 Mar 2011, Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • AntoniouGvan HarmelenFWeb ontology language: OWLHandbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems2004
  • Arango G (1989). Domain analysis: From art to engineering discipline. In: Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • BézivinJIn search of a basic principle for model-driven engineeringNovatica J2004522124
  • BézivinJOn the unification power of modelsSoftw Syst Model20054217118810.1007/s10270-005-0079-0
  • Bhatt M, Rahayu W and Sterling G (2004). sedOnto: A web enabled ontology for synthetic environment representation based on the SEDRIS specification. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshops, Orlando, FL.
  • BorstWNAkkermansJMEngineering ontologiesInt J Hum Comput Stud1997462/336540610.1006/ijhc.1996.0096
  • Davis KP and Anderson AR (2003). Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations. RAND Technical Report.
  • Durak U, Oğuztüzün H and İder K (2006). An ontology for trajectory simulation. Winter Simulation Conference (WSC06), Monterey, CA, USA.
  • Durak U, Güler S, Oğuztüzün H and İder K (2007). An exercise in ontology driven trajectory simulation with MATLAB Simulink. 21st EUROPEAN Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • DurakUOğuztüzünHİderSKOntology based trajectory simulation frameworkJ Comput Inform Sci Eng200881014503-1014503-510.1115/1.2830845
  • DurakUOğuztüzünHİderKOntology-based domain engineering for trajectory simulation reuseInt J Softw Eng Know Eng20091981109112910.1142/S0218194009004532
  • ErikssonHEPenkerMLyonsBFadoDUML 2 Toolkit2004
  • Falbo RA, Guizzardi G and Duarte KC (2002). An ontological approach to domain engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Ischia, Italy.
  • FayadMSchmidtDCObject-oriented application frameworksCommun ACM19974010323810.1145/262793.262798
  • Jackson E, Hildreth B, York B and Cleveland W (2004). Evaluation of a candidate flight dynamics model simulation standard exchange format. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Johnson RE (1997). Components, frameworks, patterns. Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability, Boston, MA.
  • KeltonWDSadowskiRPSadowskiDASimulation with Arena1998
  • Miller JA, Baramidze G, Fiswick PA and Sheth AP (2004). Investigating ontologies for simulation modeling. 37th Annual Simulation Symposium, Virginia.
  • Mizoguchi R (2001). Ontological engineering: Foundations of the next generation knowledge processing. Web Intelligence 2001, Maebashi City, Japan.
  • Niles I and Pease A (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Ogunquit, Maine.
  • Özdikiş Ö, Durak U and Oğuztüzün H (2009). OWL to UML: Transforming domain models to framework architectures. Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Istanbul.
  • Özdikiş Ö, Durak U and Oğuztüzün H (2010). Tool support for transformation from an OWL ontology to an HLA object model. SIMUTOOOLS, Malaga, Spain.
  • PaceDKIdeas about simulation conceptual model developmentJ Hopkins APL Tech D2000213327336
  • Page EH, Briggs R and Tufarolo JA (2004). Toward a family of maturity models for the simulation interconnection problem. Proceedings of the Spring 2004 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Arlington, VA.
  • Schreiber G, Wielinga B and Jansweijer W (1995). The KACTUS view on the ‘O’ word. In: Proceedings of IJCAI95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada.
  • Silver GA, Bellipady KR, Miller JA, York WS and Kochut KJ (2009). Supporting interoperability using the discrete-event modeling ontology (DeMO). In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM/IEEE Winter Simulation Conference (WSC’09), Austin, Texas.
  • Tolk A (2004). Composable mission spaces and M&S repositories – Applicability of open standards. In: Proceedings of Spring 2004 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Arlington, VA.
  • Tolk A and Muguira J (2003). The levels of conceptual interoperability model (LCIM). Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL.
  • Tolk A, Diallo SY, King RD and Turnitsa CD (2009). A layered approach to composition and interoperation in complex systems. In: Tolk A (ed). Complex Systems in Knowledge-based Environments: Theory, Models and Applications, pp. 41–74.
  • TolkATurnitsaCDDialloSYImplied ontological representation within the levels of conceptual interoperability modelIntell Decis Technol20082131910.3233/IDT-2008-2102
  • Turnitsa CD and Tolk A (2006). Ontology applied – Techniques employing ontological representation for M&S. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL.
  • Uschold M and King M (1995). Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada.
  • US Department of Defense (1995). Missile flight simulation, part one surface-to-air missiles. MIL-HDBK 1211.
  • Yilmaz L (2007a). Using meta-level ontology relations to measure conceptual alignment and interoperability of simulation models. Winter Simulation Conference (WSC07), Washington, DC.
  • YilmazLA strategy for improving dynamic composability: Ontology-driven introspective agent architecturesJ Syst Cybern Inform20075519
  • YilmazLÖrenTProspective issues in simulation model composability: Basic concepts to advance theory, methodology, and technologyMSIAC's M&S J Online20062217
  • Zeigler B, Mittal S and Hu X (2008). Towards a formal standard for interoperability in M&S/system of systems integration. Proceedings of the GMU-AFCEA Symposium on Critical Issues in C4I, May.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.