References
- KeeneyRLRaiffaHDecisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs1993
- SaatyTLA scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJ Math Psychol19771523428110.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
- SaatyTLThe Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation1980
- BeltonVGearTOn a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchiesOmega19831122823010.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6
- BarzilaiJGolanyBAHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rulesINFOR1994325764
- BarzilaiJLootsmaFAPower relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMARTJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997615516510.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199705)6:3<155::AID-MCDA131>3.0.CO;2-4
- BarzilaiJDeriving weights from pairwise comparison matricesJ Opl Res Soc1997481226123210.1057/palgrave.jors.2600474
- LootsmaFAMulti-criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement1999
- TriantaphyllouETwo new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHPJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal200110112510.1002/mcda.284
- SaatyTLHow to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessEur J Opl Res19904892610.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
- HarkerPTVargasLGReply to ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process’ by JS DyerMngt Sci19903626927310.1287/mnsc.36.3.269
- StamADuarteSAPOn multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHPEur J Opl Res20031459210810.1016/S0377-2217(02)00228-X
- De JongPA statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for prioritiesJ Math Psychol19842846747810.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0
- CrawfordGWilliamsCA note on the analysis of subjective judgment matricesJ Math Psychol19852938740510.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
- BudescuDVZwickRRapoportAA comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scalingAppl Psychol Meas198610697810.1177/014662168601000106
- GenestCRivestL-PA statistical look at Saaty's method of estimating pairwise preferences expressed on a ratio scaleJ Math Psychol19943847749610.1006/jmps.1994.1034
- AlhoJMKangasJKolehmainenOUncertainty in expert predictions of the ecological consequences of forest plansAppl Stat19964511410.2307/2986218
- AlhoJMKangasJAnalyzing uncertainties in experts' opinions of forest plan performanceForest Sci199743521528
- LeskinenPKangasJAnalysing uncertainties of interval judgment data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plansSilva Fenn19983236337210.14214/sf.677
- AlhoJMKolehmainenOLeskinenPRegression methods for pairwise comparisons dataThe Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making2001235251
- LeskinenPMeasurement scales and scale independence in the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal2000916317410.1002/1099-1360(200007)9:4<163::AID-MCDA274>3.0.CO;2-L
- Leskinen P (2001). Statistical methods for measuring preferences. DSc thesis, University of Joensuu, Publications in Social Sciences 48, 111 pp.
- SchonerBWedleyWCAmbiguous criteria weights in AHP: consequences and solutionsDecis Sci19892046247510.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01561.x
- SchenkermanSAvoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support modelsEur J Opl Res19947440741910.1016/0377-2217(94)90220-8
- KorhonenPComments on Barzilai and LootsmaJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997616716810.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199705)6:3<167::AID-MCDA133>3.0.CO;2-U
- MilletISaatyTLOn the relativity of relative measures—accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHPEur J Opl Res200012120521210.1016/S0377-2217(99)00040-5
- WedleyWCSchonerBChooEUClustering, dependence and ratio scales in AHP: rank reversals and incorrect priorities with a single criterionJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1993214515810.1002/mcda.4020020304