References
- AdlerNFriedmanLSinuany-SternZReview of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis contextEur J Opl Res200214024926510.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
- AppaGWilliamsHPA new framework for the solution of DEA modelsEur J Opl Res200617260461510.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.051
- CharnesACooperWWHuangZMSunDBPolyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banksJ Econom199046739110.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-X
- CharnesACooperWWRhodesEMeasuring the efficiency of decision making unitsEur J Opl Res1978242944410.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- DoyleJGreenREfficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and usesJ Opl Res Soc19944556757810.1057/jors.1994.84
- DysonRGThanassoulliEReducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJ Opl Res Soc19883956357610.1057/jors.1988.96
- GolanyBAn interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysisJ Opl Res Soc19883972573410.1057/jors.1988.127
- KaoCHungHTData envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approachJ Opl Res Soc2005561196120310.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924
- RollYCookWDGolanyBControlling factor weights in data envelopment analysisIIE Trans1991232910.1080/07408179108963835
- SextonTRSilkmanRHHoganAJData envelopment analysis: Critique and extensionsMeasuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis198673105
- ThompsonRGLangemeierLNLeeCTLeeEThrallRMThe role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farmingJ Econom1990469310810.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
- TrouttMDA maximum decisional efficiency estimation principleMngt Sci199541768210.1287/mnsc.41.1.76
- WongYHBBeasleyJERestricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJ Opl Res Soc19904182983510.1057/jors.1990.120