Handling the complexities of the multi-constrained portfolio optimization problem with the support of a novel MOEA

References

• Anagnostopoulos, K., & Mamanis, G. (2010). A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables. Computers & Operations Research, 37(7), 1285–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaei, S., Sepehri, M. M., & Babaei, E. (2015). Multi-objective portfolio optimization considering the dependence structure of asset returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(2), 525–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu, A., Yunusoglu, M. G., & Burcin Özsoydan, F. (2015). A GRASP based solution approach to solve cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 90(1), 339–351.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, J. E. (1990). OR-Library: Distributing test problems by electronic mail. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1069–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsimas, D., & Shioda, R. (2009). Algorithm for cardinality constrained quadratic optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications, 43(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, T., Leftwich, R., & Long, J. (1977). Portfolio strategies and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branke, J., Scheckenbach, B., Stein, M., Deb, K., & Schmeck, H. (2009). Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 684–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesarone, F., Scozzari, A. and Tardella, F. (2008). Efficient algorithms for mean–variance portfolio optimization with hard real-world constraints. In The 18th AFIR colloquium: Financial risk in a changing world, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T. J., Meade, N., Beasley, J. E., & Sharaiha, Y. M. (2000). Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Computers & Operations Research, 27(13), 1271–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza, M., Fasano, G., & Gusso, R. (2013). Particle swarm optimization with non-smooth penalty reformulation, for a complex portfolio selection problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 224, 611–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K., & Agrawal, R. B. (1995). Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9(2), 115–148.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., & Tiwari, S. (2008). Omni-optimizer: A generic evolutionary algorithm for single and multi-objective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(3), 1062–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. L., & Archer, S. H. (1968). Diversification and the reduction of dispersion: An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 23(5), 761–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, L., & Lorie, J. H. (1970). Some studies of variability of returns on investments in common stocks. Journal of Business, 43(2), 99–134.
   Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2013). An elitist polynomial mutation operator for improved performance of MOEAs in computer networks. In Computer communications and networks (ICCCN), 2013 22nd international conference on (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1109/ICCCN.2013.6614105
   Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2014). A new probe guided mutation operator and its application for solving the cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(14), 6274–6290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2015a). An experimental analysis of a new two-stage crossover operator for multiobjective optimization. Soft Computing, doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1810-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2015b). An experimental analysis of a new interval-based mutation operator. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 14(3), 1550018. doi:10.1142/S1469026815500182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2015c). Efficient portfolio construction with the use of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Best practices and performance metrics. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(3), 535–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2015). Enhancing the performance of MOEAs: An experimental presentation of a new fitness guided mutation operator. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2015.1132260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liagkouras, K., & Metaxiotis, K. (2015e). A new probe guided mutation operator for more efficient exploration of the search space: An experimental analysis. International Journal of Operational Research, 25(2), 212–251.
   Google Scholar
• Lwin, K., Qu, R., & Kendall, G. (2014). A learning-guided multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for constrained portfolio optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 757–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metaxiotis, K., & Liagkouras, K. (2012). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for portfolio management: A comprehensive literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(14), 11685–11698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metaxiotis, K., & Liagkouras, K. (2013). A fitness guided mutation operator for improved performance of MOEAs electronics, circuits, and systems (ICECS). In 2013 IEEE 20th international conference on (pp. 751–754). doi:10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815523
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S. K., Panda, G., & Majhi, R. (2014). A comparative performance assessment of a set of multiobjective algorithms for constrained portfolio assets selection. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 16, 38–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S. K., Panda, G., & Majhi, B. (2016). Prediction based meanvariance model for constrained portfolio assets selection using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 28(2016), 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Saborido, R., Ruiz, A. B., Bermúdez, J. D., Vercher, E., & Luque, M. (2016). Evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms for fuzzy portfolio selection. Applied Soft Computing, 39, 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. X., Liu, S., & Kopman, L. (2008). Lagrangian relaxation procedure for cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization. Optimisation Methods & Software, 23(3), 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streichert, F., Ulmer, H., & Zell, A. (2004a). Evaluating a hybrid encoding and three crossover operators on the constrained portfolio selection problem. In Proceedings of the Congress on evolutionary computation (CEC 2004), Portland (pp. 932–939).
   Google Scholar
• Streichert, F., Ulmer, H., & Zell, A. (2004a). Comparing discrete and continuous genotypes on the constrained portfolio selection problem. In K. Deb et al. (Ed.), Genetic and evolutionary computation—GECCO 2004. Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference. Part II, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3103, pp. 1239–1250). Seattle: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vercher, E., & Bermúdez, J. D. (2015). Portfolio optimization using a credibility mean-absolute semi-deviation model. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7121–7131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside-Oriakhi, M., Lucas, C., & Beasley, J. E. (2011). Heuristic algorithms for the cardinality constrained efficient frontier. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(3), 538–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside-Oriakhi, M., Lucas, C., & Beasley, J. E. (2013). Portfolio rebalancing with an investment horizon and transaction costs. Omega, 41(2), 406–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(6), 712–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., & Zhang, W. G. (2014). Multiperiod mean absolute deviation fuzzy portfolio selection model with risk control and cardinality constraints. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 255(16), 74–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L. (1999). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4), 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., Deb, K., & Thiele, L. (2000). Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation, 8(2), 173–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Foneseca, C. M., & Fonseca, V. G. (2003). Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: An analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar