Managing losses in exotic horse race wageringFootnote

Please note this paper has been re-typeset by Taylor & Francis from the manuscript originally provided to the previous publisher.

References

• Asch, P., Malkiel, B. G., & Quandt, R. E. (1984). Market efciency in racetrack betting. The Journal of Business, 57(2), 165−175.
   Google Scholar
• Benter, W. (2008). Computer based horse race handicapping and wagering systems: a report. In D. B. Hausch, V. S. Y. Lo & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.) Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (pp. 183–198). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R. N. & Chapman, R. G. (1986). Searching for positive returns at the track: a multinomial logic model for handicapping horse races. Management Science, 32(8), 1040–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonami, P., Biegler, L. T., Conn, A. R., Cornuéjols, G., Grossmann, I. E., Laird, C. D., & Wächter, A. (2008). An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs. Discrete Optimization, 5(2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandimarte, P. (2006). Numerical Methods in Finance and Eco‐ nomics: A Matlab‐Based Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, B. (2001). Blackjack for Blood. Pi Yee Press.
   Google Scholar
• CompuBet. (2014). Retrieved June 2, 2014, from https://compubet.com
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, Y. (2012). Estimation of multinomial logit models. In R: The mlogit packages. R package version, 0.2.4.
   Google Scholar
• Harville, D. A. (1973). Assigning probabilities to the outcomes of multi-entry competitions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(342), 312–316.
   Google Scholar
• Hausch, D. B., Ziemba, W. T., & Rubinstein, M. (1981). Efciency of the market for racetrack betting. Management Science, 27(12), 1435–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HorsePlayer Interactive. (2014). Retrieved from June 2, 2914, http://www.horseplayerinteractive.com
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. (1953). Optimal horse race bets. American Mathematical Monthly, 60(5), 310–315.
   Google Scholar
• Kallberg, J. G. & Ziemba, W. T. (2008). Concavity properties of racetrack betting models. In D. B. Hausch, V. S. Y. Lo, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (p. 99107). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Kanto, A. & Rosenqvist, G. (2008). On the efciency of the market for double (quinella) bets at a Finnish racetrack. In D. B. Hausch, V. S. Y. Lo, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (p. 485498). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. (2002). The high tech trifecta. Wired Magazine, 10(3), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. L. (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 2(3), 185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, V. S. Y. (2008). Application of running time distribution models in Japan. In D. B. Hausch, V. S. Y. Lo, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (pp. 237–247). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, V. S. Y. & Bacon-Shone, J. (1994). A comparison between two models for predicting ordering probabilities in multiple-entry competitions. The Statistician, 43(2), 317–327.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, V. S. Y. & Bacon-Shone, J. (2008). Approximating the ordering probabilities of multi-entry competitions by a simple method. In D. B. Hausch & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets (p. 5165). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, L. C., Sanegre, R., Zhao, Y., & Ziemba, W. T. (2004). Capital growth with security. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(5), 937–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean, L. C., Thorp, E. O., & Ziemba, W. T. (2011). The Kelly Capital Growth Investment criterion: Theory and practice (Vol. 3). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, L. C., Ziemba, W. T., & Blazenko, G. (1992). Growth versus security in dynamic investment analysis. Management Science, 38(11), 1562–1585.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (p. 105142). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poundstone, W. (2005). Fortune’s formula: The untold story of the scientic betting system that beat the casinos and wall street. New York City, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Rosett, R. N. (1965). Gambling and rationality. The Journal of Political Economy, 73(6), 123–595.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., & Ruszczynski, A. (2009). Lectures on stochastic programming: Modeling and theory. SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Smoczynski, P., & Tomkins, D. (2010). An explicit solution to the problem of optimizing the allocations of a bettor’s wealth when wagerin g on horse races. Mathematical Scientist, 35(1), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, E. O. (2006). The Kelly criterion in blackjack, sports betting, and the stock market. In S. A. Zenios & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of asset and liability management (Vol. I, p. 385428). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, E. O. (2008, May). Understanding the Kelly criterion Wilmott Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• TrackIT. (2014). Retrieved from June 2, 2014, from https://trackit.standardbredcanada.ca
   Google Scholar
• Wächter, A., & Biegler, L. T. (2006). On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 106(1), 25–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. (1965). Utility analysis and group behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Political Economy, 73(1), 18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. X. (2011). Precision: Statistical and mathematical methods in horse racing. Denver, CO: Outskirts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. (2009). Sharp sports betting. Pi Yee Press.
   Google Scholar