A Shariah-compliant portfolio selection modelFootnote

Please note this paper has been re-typeset by Taylor & Francis from the manuscript originally provided to the previous publisher.

References

• Abbes, M. B. (2012). Risk and return of Islamic and conventional indices. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, 5(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, F. B., & Masmoudi, M. (2014). A multiple objective stochastic portfolio selection problem with random Beta. International Transactions in Operational Research, 21(6), 919–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, F. B., & Masri, H. (2009). Multistage stochastic programming with fuzzy probability distribution. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(22), 3239–3249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, F. B., Aouni, B., & Fayedh, R. E. (2007). Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1811–1823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, F. B., Lang, P., & Nadeau, R. (1999). Dominance and efciency in multicriteria decision under uncertainty. Theory and Decision, 47(3), 191–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, F. B., Lang, P., & Nadeau, R. (1995). Distributional efciency in multiobjective stochastic linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 85(2), 399–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, F. B., Lang, P., & Nadeau, R. (1994). Pointwise efciency in multiobjective stochastic linear programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(11), 1324–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Rahman, A., Azlan Yahya, M., & Herry Mohd Nasir, M. (2010). Islamic norms for stock screening: A comparison between the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange Islamic index and the dow jones Islamic market index. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 228–240.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shammari, M., & Masri, H. (2016). Ethical and Social Perspectives on Global Business Interaction in Emerging Markets. Hershey: IGI global International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aouni, B., & La Torre, D. (2010). A generalized stochastic goal programming model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 215(12), 4347–4357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., & Pli-Santamaria, D. (2012). Socially responsible investment: A multi-criteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballestero, E., Pérez-Gladish, B., & Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (Eds.). (2014). Socially Responsible Investment: A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach (Vol. 219). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional bankin g: Busin ess model, efciency and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellalah, M. (2014). On Islamic Banking. Performance and Financial Innovations: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, U., & Hanif, M. (2010). Validity of capital assets pricing model: Evidence from KSE-Pakistan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 20(10), 148–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Terol, A., Arenas-Parra, M., & Cañal–Fernández, V. (2012). Selection of socially responsible portfolios using goal programming and fuzzy technology. Information Sciences, 189, 110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouslah, K. S., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2016). Social performance and firm risk: Impact of the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3017-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. A. T., Jr. (2008). Why risk is not variance: An expository note. Risk Analysis, 28(4), 925–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dchieche, A., & Aboulaich, R. (2016). New approach to model Salam contract for profit and loss sharing. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(2), 909–916.
   Google Scholar
• Derigs, U., & Marzban, S. (2009). New strategies and a new paradigm for Shariah-compliant portfolio optimization. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(6), 1166–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garas, S. N., & Pierce, C. (2010). Shari’a supervision of Islamic financial institutions. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(4), 386–407.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, M. Z., Kamil, A. A., Mustafa, A., & Baten, M. A. (2011). A validity test of capital asset pricing model for Dhaka stock exchange. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(20), 3490–3496.
   Google Scholar
• Hazny, M. H., Hashim, H. M., & Yusof, A. Y. (2012). Revisiting Markowitz’s mean variance analysis: A review from Shariah perspective. In Proceedings, 2012 International Conerence on Statistics in Science, Business, and Engineering (ICSSBE) (pp. 303–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, Y., Managi, S., & Matsuda, A. (2012). Performances of socially responsible investment and environmentally friendly funds. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(11), 1583–1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahsasna, A. (2014). Shari’ah Noncompliance Risk Management and Legal Documentations in Islamic Finance. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., Cheng, F. F., & Chong, S. C. (2016). Markowitz portfolio theory and capital asset pricing model for Kuala Lumpur stock exchange: A case revisited. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3S), 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Managi, S., Okimoto, T., & Matsuda, A. (2012). Do socially responsible investment indexes outperform conventional indexes? Applied Financial Economics, 22(18), 1511–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1959). Portolio Selection: Efficient Diversification in Investments. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Masmoudi, M., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2012). A recourse goal programming approach for the portfolio selection problem. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 50(3), 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masmoudi, M., & Ben Abdelaziz, F. B. (2015). A chance constrained recourse approach for the portfolio selection problem. Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1844-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri, H. (2015). A multiple stochastic goal programming approach for the agent portfolio selection problem. Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1884-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri, H., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2010). Belief linear programming. International journal of approximate reasoning, 51(8), 973–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar Farooq, M., & Hasib Reza, M. (2014). Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index: Applying technical analysis from a comparative perspective. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 7(4), 395–420.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, S. A. (2010). Corporate finance in an interest free economy: An alternate approach to practiced Islamic Corporate Finance. Journal of Islamic Banking & Finance, 27(2), 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin, A. (2014). Are Dow Jones Islamic equity indices exposed to interest rate risk? Economic Modelling, 39, 273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir, I., & Brimble, M. (2011). Islamic investment behaviour. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 4(2), 116–130.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, C., & Karim, R. A. A. (1987). The Shari’ah and its implications for Islamic financial analysis: An opportunity to study interactions among society, organization and accounting. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 4(1), 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S., & Wimmer, M. (2014). Are they any good at all quest? A financial and ethical analysis of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Asset Management, 15(1), 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S., Wimmer, M., & Steuer, R. E. (2015). Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk-de Groota, M., & Nijhof, A. H. J. (2015). Socially Responsible investment funds: A review of research priorities and strategic options. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(3), 178–204.
   Google Scholar
• Veld, C., & Veld-Merkoulova, Y. V. (2008). The risk perceptions of individual investors. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 226–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar