149
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

On elicitation-method effect in game experiments: a competing newsvendor perspective

&
Pages 541-555 | Received 12 Apr 2016, Accepted 08 May 2017, Published online: 16 Jan 2018

References

  • Bansal, S., & Moritz, B. (2015). Perceived versus actual value of product substitution flexibility: An experimental investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 38, 5670.
  • Becker-Peth, M., & Thonemann, U. W. (2016). Reference points in revenue sharing contractshow to design optimal supply chain contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 1033–1049.
  • Becker-Peth, M., Katok, E., & Thonemann, U. W. (2013). Designin g buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Science, 59(8), 1800–1816.
  • Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (2008). Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manuacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(3), 519–538.
  • Bostian, A. A., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2008). Newsvendor pull-to-center effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 590–608.
  • Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2000). Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experimental Economics, 2(3), 227–238.
  • Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2011). The strategy versus the directresponse method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 375–398.
  • Casari, M., & Cason, T. N. (2009). The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior. Economics Letters, 103(3), 157159.
  • Chen, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). Decision bias in capacity allocation games with uncertain demand. Production and Operations Management, 24(4), 634–646.
  • Chen, L., & KOk, A. G., and Tong, J. D. (2013). The effect of payment schemes on inventory decisions: The role of mental accounting. Management Science, 59(2), 436–451.
  • Davis, A. M. (2015). An experimental investigation of pull contracts in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 24(2), 325–340.
  • Davis, A. M., Katok, E., & Santamará, N. (2014). Push, pull, or both? A behavioral study of how the allocation of inventory risk affects channel efciency. Management Science, 60(11), 26662683.
  • Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving forces behind informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017–2030.
  • Feng, T., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Modeling strategic behavior in the competitive newsvendor problem: an experimental investigation. Production and Operations Management. doi:10.1111/poms.12683.
  • Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
  • Fischbacher, U., Gichter, S., & Quercia, S. (2012). The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 897–913.
  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Delhi: Pearson Education India.
  • GUth, W., Huck, S., and MUller, W., (2001). The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior, 37(1), 161–169.
  • Ho, T., Lim, N., & Cui, T. H. (2010). Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Science, 56(11), 1891–1910.
  • Kalkanci, B., Chen, K., & Erhun, F. (2011). Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Science, 57(4), 689–704.
  • Kalkanci, B., Chen, K., & Erhun, F. (2014). Complexity as a contract design factor: A human-to-human experimental study. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 269–284.
  • Katok, E., & Wu, D. Y. (2009). Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 55(12), 19531968.
  • Kremer, M., Minner, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Do random errors explain newsvendor behavior? Manuacturing & Service Operations Management, 12(4), 673–681.
  • Lee, Y. S., & Siemsen, E. (2016). Task decomposition and newsvendor decision making. Management Science. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2521.
  • Li, M., Petruzzi, N. C., & Zhang, J. (2016). Overconfident competing newsvendors. Management Science. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2469.
  • Lippman, S. A., & McCardle, K. F. (1997). The competitive newsboy. Operations Research, 45(1), 54–65.
  • Ovchinnikov, A., Moritz, B., & Quiroga, B. F. (2015). How to compete against a behavioral newsvendor. Production and Operations Management, 24(11), 1783–1793.
  • Oxoby, R. J., & McLeish, K. N. (2004). Sequential decision and strategy vector methods in ultimatum bargaining: Evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Economics Letters, 84(3), 399–405.
  • Özer, Ö., Zheng, Y., & Chen, K. (2011). Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Science, 57(6), 1111–1137.
  • Özer, Ö., Zheng, Y., & Ren, Y. (2014). Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging china and the United States. Management Science, 60(10), 2435–2460.
  • Parlar, M. (1988). Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Research Logistics, 35(3), 397–409.
  • Rapoport, A., & Fuller, M. A. (1995). Biddin g strategies in a bilateral monopoly with two-sided incomplete information. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39(2), 179–196.
  • Ren, Y., & Croson, R. (2013). Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Science, 59(11), 2502–2517.
  • Schweitzer, M. E., & Cachon, G. P. (2000). Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Science, 46(3), 404–420.
  • Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmeneines Oligopolexperiments. Beiträage zur Experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (pp. 136–168). Tübingen: Mohr.
  • Solnick, S. J. (2007). Cash and alternate methods of accounting in an experimental game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62(2), 316–321.
  • Spiliotopoulou, E., Donohue, K., & Gürbüz, M. C¸ (2016). Information reliability in supply chains: The case of multiple retailers. Production and Operations Management, 25(3), 548–567.
  • Su, X. (2008). Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manuacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 566–589.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 11241131.
  • Wu, D. Y. (2013). The impact of repeated interactions on supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(1), 3–15.
  • Wu, H., & Parlar, M. (2011). Games with incomplete information: A simplified exposition with inventory management applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 562–577.
  • Wu, D. Y., & Chen, K. (2014). Supply chain contract design: Impact of bounded rationality and individual heterogeneity. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 253–268.
  • Zhang, Y., Donohue, K., & Cui, T. H. (2016). Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Science, 62(6), 1734–1754.
  • Zhao, Y., & Zhao, X. (2016). How a competing environment influences newsvendor’s ordering decisions. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 204–214.
  • Zhao, Y., Zhao, X., Wang, L., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2016). Does elicitation method matter? Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence from capacity allocation game. Production and Operations Management, 25(5), 919–934.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.