Performance evaluation of Portuguese mutual fund portfolios using the value-based DEA methodFootnote

Please note this paper has been re-typeset by Taylor & Francis from the manuscript originally provided to the previous publisher.

References

• Ali, A. I., Lerme, C. S., & Seiford, L. (1995). Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3), 462–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P. N., & Dias, L. C. (2012). Value-based DEA models: Application-driven developments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(1), 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, C., & Mendes, V. (2010). Mutual funds biased preference for the parent’s stock: Evidence and explanation. Applied Financial Economics, 20(16), 1309–1320.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babalos, V., Doumpos, M., Philippas, N., & Zopounidis, C. (2015). Towards a holistic approach for mutual fund performance appraisal. Computational Economics, 46(1), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babalos, V., Philippas, N., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2012). Mutual funds performance appraisal using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(9), 5693–5703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N., Huan, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2001). A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(3), 477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2003). Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: A DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(5), 521–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(2), 961–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, J. B., & Binsbergen, J. H. (2016). Assessing asset pricing models using revealed preference. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, J. A., Goyal, A., & Wahal, S. (2010). Performance and persistence in institutional investment management. Journal of Finance, 65(2), 765–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrita, M. D. R., & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1–3), 212–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. P. (2004). Evaluating mutual fund performance: An application of minimum convex input requirement set approach. Computers and Operations Research, 31(6), 929–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004). Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. K., & Murthi, B. P. S. (2001). Relative performance evaluation of mutual funds: A non-parametric approach. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(7–8), 853–876.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, B. (1999). The equity risk premium: The long-run future of the stock market. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cortez, M. D. C. R., Paxson, D. A., & Armada, M. J. D. R. (1999). Persistence in Portuguese mutual fund performance. The European Journal of Finance, 5(4), 342–365.
   Google Scholar
• Cremers, K. J. M., & Petajisto, A. (2009). How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3329–3365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). A robust nonparametric approach to evaluate and explain the performance of mutual funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 516–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1988). Reducing weight flexibility in DEA. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 39(6), 563–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2010). Luck versus skill in the cross section of mutual fund returns. Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1915–1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. A., Keswani, A., Miguel, A. F., & Ramos, S. (2013). The determinants of mutual fund performance: A cross-country study. Review of Finance, 17(3), 483–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galagedera, D. U. A., & Silvapulle, P. (2002). Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Managerial Finance, 28(9), 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Glawischnig, M., & Sommersguter-Reichmann, M. (2010). Assessing the performance of alternative investments using non-parametric efficiency measurement approaches: Is it convincing? Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(2), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (1998). Decision analysis for management judgment. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gouveia, M. C., Dias, L. C., & Antunes, C. H. (2008). Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(1), 54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouveia, M. C., Dias, L. C., & Antunes, C. H. (2013). Super-efficiency and stability intervals in additive DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(1), 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouveia, M. C., Dias, L. C., Antunes, C. H., Boucinha, J., & Inácio, C. F. (2015). Benchmarking of maintenance and outage repair in an electricity distribution company using the value-based DEA method. Omega, 53, 104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouveia, M. C., Dias, L. C., Antunes, C. H., Mota, M. A., Duarte, E. M., & Tenreiro, E. M. (2016). An application of an additive DEA model to identify best practices in primary health care. OR Spectrum, 38(3), 743–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoriou, G. N. (2007). Diversification and portfolio management on mutual funds. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoriou, G. N., Sedzro, K., & Zhu, J. (2005). Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(2), 555–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halme, M., Joro, T., Korhonen, P., Salo, S. E., & Wallenius, J. (1999). A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 45(1), 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H., & Sraer, D. A. (2016). Speculative betas. The Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2095–2144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ippolito, R. (1989). Efficiency with costly information: A study of mutual fund performance. Journal of Economics, 104(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joro, T., & Viitala, E. J. (2004). Weight-restricted DEA in action: From expert opinions to mathematical models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(1), 814–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk, M. T., Sialm, C., & Zheng, L. (2005). On industry concentration of actively managed equity mutual funds. Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1983–2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedmatgozar, H. R., Kazemi, A., & Hanafizadeh, P. (2013). Mutual fund performance evaluation: A value efficiency analysis approach. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 7(3/4), 263–280.
   Google Scholar
• Khorana, A., Servaes, H., & Tufano, P. (2005). Explaining the size of the mutual fund industry around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(1), 145–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2001). SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 49(3), 444–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, J. D., & Tee, K. (2012). Data envelopment analysis models of investment funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(3), 687–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, P., Faria, O., & Armada, M. R. (2016). The impact of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis on bond fund performance persistence: Evidence from a small market. Investment Analysts Journal, 45(suppl 1), S32–S45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, D. (2012). A flow-based explanation for return predictability. Review of Financial Studies, 25(12), 3457–3489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, P. R., & Strong, R. A. (1998). Selection of mutual funds using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 4(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, K. Y., & Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 408–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pástor, L., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2015). Scale and skill in active management. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pätäri, E., Leivo, T., & Honkapuro, S. (2012). Enhancement of equity portfolio performance using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(3), 786–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). Service productivity management: Improving service performance using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tarnaud, A. C., & Hervé, L. (2017). Portfolio analysis with DEA: Prior to choosing a model. Omega. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treynor, J. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treynor, J., & Mazuy, K. (1966). Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44(4), 131–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis behavioral research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkens, K., & Zhu, J. (2001). Portfolio evaluation and benchmark selection: A mathematical programming approach. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 4(1), 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wermers, R. (2000). Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transactions costs, and expenses. Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1655–1695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X. S. (2008). Liquidity, investment style, and the relation between fund size and fund performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(3), 741–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C., Galariotis, E., Doumpos, M., Sarri, S., & Andriosopoulos, K. (2015). Multiple criteria decision aiding for finance: An updated bibliographic survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar