Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of the Operational Research Society Volume 69, 2018 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
614
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Data envelopment analysis in satisfaction survey research: sample size problem

Jesús Alberto TapiaDepartment of Statistic and Operative Research, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, SpainCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Bonifacio SalvadorDepartment of Statistic and Operative Research, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
&
Jesús María RodríguezDirección General Presupuestos y Estadística de la Junta de Castilla y León, Consejería de Hacienda, Valladolid, Spain
Pages 1096-1104 | Received 13 Jul 2015, Accepted 03 Aug 2017, Published online: 12 Jan 2018

References

  • Banker, R. D. (1993). Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: A statistical foundation. Management Science, 39(10), 1265–1273.
  • Ceyhan, M. E., & Benneyan, J. C. (2014). Handling estimated proportions in public sector data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 107–132.
  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73–79.
  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1963). Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints. Operations Research, 11(1), 18–39.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
  • Cooper, W. W., Deng, H., Huang, Z., & Li, S. X. (2002). Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(12), 1347–1356.
  • Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z., & Li, S. X. (1996). Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 66(4), 279–295.
  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: With DEA-solver software and references. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Huang, Z., & Li, S. X. (2001). Stochastic DEA models with different types of input-output disturbances. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15(2), 95–113.
  • Khodabakhshi, M. (2010). An output oriented super-efficiency measure in stochastic data envelopment analysis: Considering Iranian electricity distribution companies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(4), 663–671.
  • Khodabakhshi, M., & Asgharian, M. (2009). An input relaxation measure of efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(4), 2010–2023.
  • Land, K. C., Lovell, C., & Thore, S. (1993). Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(6), 541–554.
  • Lehmann, E. L., & Casella, G. (1998). Theory of point estimation. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Olesen, O. B., & Petersen, N. (1995). Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41(3), 442–457.
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
  • Särndal, C. E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. (2003). Model assisted survey sampling. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Sengupta, J. K. (1987). Data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement in the stochastic case. Computers & Operations Research, 14(2), 117–129.
  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61.
  • Tavana, M., Shiraz, R. K., & Hatami-Marbini, A. (2014). A new chance constrained DEA model with birandom input and output data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(12), 1824–1839.
  • Wu, D. D. (2010). A systematic stochastic efficiency analysis model and application to international supplier performance evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6257–6264.
  • Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. International Journal of Production Research, 46(8), 2313–2327.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.