New Methods for Interpretation of Magnetic Gradient Tensor Data

References

• Anton, H. and Rorres, C., 2000, Elementary Linear Algebra: Applications Version, Eighth Edition, Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Beiki, M., Pedersen, L.B. and Nazi, H., 2011, Interpretation of aeromagnetic data using eigenvector analysis of pseudogravity gradient tensor, Geophysics, 76, L1, doi:10.1190/1.3555343.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, R.J., 1996, Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken, R.E. and Brown, P.J., 2006, Concepts and Procedures Required for Successful Reduction of Tensor Magnetic Gradiometer Data Obtained from an Unexploded Ordnance Detection Demonstration at Yuma Proving Grounds, Arizona, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1027.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. and Rajagopalan, Shanti, 2000,The magnetic vector and gradient tensor in mineral and oil exploration, Preview, 84, p.77.
   Google Scholar
• Chwala, A., Stolz, R., IJsselsteijn, R., Schultze, V., Ukhansky, N., Meyer, H.-G. and Schuler, T., 2001, SQUID gradiometers for archaeometry, Superconductor Science and Technology, 14, 1111–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D.A., Schmidt, P.W., Coward, D.A. and Huddleston, M.P., 1998, Remote determination of magnetic properties and improved drill targeting of magnetic anomaly sources by Differential Vector Magnetometry (DVM), Exploration Geophysics, 29, 312-319.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D.A. and Lackie, M.A., 2003, Palaeomagnetism of the Early Permian Mount Leyshon Intrusive Complex and Tuckers Igneous Complex, North Queensland, Australia, Geophysical Journal International, 153, 523-547.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D.A., Geuna, S. And Schmidt, P.W., 2004, Predictive magnetic exploration models for porphyry, epithermal and iron oxide copper-gold deposits: implications for exploration. AMIRA P700 Final Report, CD ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D.A., Young, J.A. and Schmidt, P.W., 2009, Magnetic Tensor Gradiometry in the Marine Environment: Correction of Electric And Magnetic Field And Gradient Measurements in a Conductive Medium and Improved Methods for Magnetic Target Location Using the Magnetic Gradient Tensor, MARELEC (Marine Electromagnetics) Conference, Stockholm, July, 2009, 10pp. CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D.A., 2010, Method and apparatus for detection using magnetic gradient tensor. U.S. Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2010/0211337 Al, Pub. Date: Aug. 19, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Clem, T.R., Froelich, M.C., Overway, D.J., Purpura, J.W., Wiegert, R.F., Koch, R.H., Lathrop, D.K., Rozen, J., Eraker, J.H., Schmidt, J.M., 1997, Advances in sensor development and demonstration of superconducting gradiometers for mobile operation, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 7, 3287-3293. Clem, T.R., Overway, D.J., Purpura, J.W., Bono, J.T., Koch, R.H., Rozen, J., Keeefe, G.A., Willen, S. and Mohling, R.A., 2001, High-Tc SQUID gradiometer for mobile magnetic anomaly detection, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 11, 871-875.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D. and Holstein, H., 2006, Innovative data processing methods for gradient airborne geophysical data sets. The Leading Edge, 25(1), 87-94.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D., Argast, D., Paterson, R. and Holstein, H., 2009, Full tensor magnetic gradiometery processing and interpretation developments, 11th SAGA Technical Meeting and Exhibition, Swaziland, 16-18 September, 2009, 265-272.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D., Argast, D., Paterson, R. and Holstein, H., 2010, Progress on interpreting dykes from full tensor magnetic gradiometry, SEG Expanded Abstracts, 29, 1162, doi:10.1190/1.3513050
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, S. And Munschy, M., 2010, Review of magnetic functions for geophysical prospecting, Abstract #NS23A-1441, AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, C., 2006, The improvements in source resolution that can be expected from inversion of magnetic field tensor data, The Leading Edge, 25(1), 81-84.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, P., 2007, Analysis of potential field gradient data: forward modelling, inversion and near-surface exploration, Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, H., Fitzgerald, D., Willis, C.P. and Foss, C., 2011, Magnetic gradient tensor eigen-analysis for dyke location, 73rd EAEG Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, May 23-27, 2011, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, K.P., Horton, T.J. and Keene, M.N., 2005, Detection of mobile targets from a moving platform using an actively shielded, adaptively balanced SQUID gradiometer, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 15 (2), 753-756.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, C.C. and Sharp, J.A., 1983, Werner deconvolution for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt’s inverse modeling, Geophysics, 48, 754-774.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, K.E., Bick, M., Binks, R.A., Tilbrook, D.L., Clark, D.A., Schmidt, P.W., Cusack, P.J., Thorn, R.G., Blay, K. R. And Sullivan, P.R., 2005, Performance issues for a spinning gradiometer, 10th International Superconductive Electronics Conference (ISEC 2005); Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. 2005: OO-01.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, K.E., Blay, K., Clark, D., Schmidt, P., Tilbrook, D., Bick, M. and Foley, C., 2007, Helicopter trial of magnetic tensor gradiometer. ASEG 19th International Conference, December 2007, Perth, Western Australia, 4 pp., CD ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, E.A., Irimia, A. and Wikswo, J.P., 2006, The magnetic inverse problem, In J. Clarke and A.I. Braginski (Eds.), The SQUID Handbook, Vol. II Applications of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp.139-267. McRae, W., Veryaskin, A.V., Greager, D., Ju, L., Blair, D., Chin, E-J, Dumas, J-C and Lee, B., 2004, String magnetic gradiometer system: recent airborne trials, Society of Exploration Geophysicists 74th Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts 23, 790-793.
   Google Scholar
• Nara, T., Suzuki, S., and Ando, S., 2006, A Closed-Form Formula for Magnetic Dipole Localization by Measurement of Its Magnetic Field and Spatial Gradients, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 42, 3291-3293.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L.B. and Rasmussen, T.M., 1990, The gradient tensor of potential field anomalies: Some implications on data collection and data processing of maps, Geophysics, 55, 1558-1566.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A.B., 1980, Aeromagnetic Survey Design, Geophysics, 45, 973-976.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P.W., 2006, Inversion using Euler deconvolution of the magnetic gradient tensor, Australian Earth Sciences Congress, Melbourne, Extended Abstracts, 3pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., Clark, D., Leslie, K., Bick, M., Tilbrook, D. and Foley, C., 2004, GETMAG – A SQUID magnetic tensor gradiometer for mineral and oil exploration, Exploration Geophysics, 35, 297-305.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P.W. and Clark, D.A., 2006, The magnetic gradient tensor: Its properties and uses in source characterization, The Leading Edge, 25(1), 75-78.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, M.A., Morrison, G.W., Orr, T.O.H., Foley, A.M. and Wormald, P.J., 1995, The Mount Leyshon magnetic anomaly, Exploration Geophysics, 26, 84-91.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, R., L. Fritzsch, and H.-G. Meyer, 1999, LTS SQUID sensor with a new configuration, Superconductor Science and Technology, 12, 806.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, R., Zakosarenko, V., Schulz, M., Chwala, A., Fritzsch, L., Meyer, H.-G. and Kostlin, E. O., 2006a, Magnetic fulltensor SQUID gradiometer system for geophysical applications, The Leading Edge, 25 (2), 178-180.
   Google Scholar
• R. Stolz, A. Chwala, V. Zakosarenko, M. Schulz, L. Fritzsch, and H.-G. Meyer, 2006b, SQUID technology for geophysical exploration. SEG Expanded Abstracts 25, 894-898; DOI:10.1190/1.2370400.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, A., Golden, H., McRae, W., Veryaskin, A., Ju, L. and Blair, D., 2009, Results from a novel direct magnetic gradiometer, Exploration Geophysics, 40, 222-226.
   Google Scholar
• Tilbrook, D.L., 2004, The design of a new concept HTSC axial gradiometer, Physica C, 407, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tilbrook, D.L., Clark, D.A. and Blay, K.R., 2006, Data Extraction and Calibration of a Superconducting Rotating Magnetic Tensor Gradiometer, Applied Superconductivity Conference, Seattle, August 27 – September 1, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Veryaskin, A.V., 2001, Magnetic gradiometry: a new method for magnetic gradient measurement, Sensors and Actuators A, 91, 233-235. Wiegert, R., Oeschger, J., and Tuovila, E., 2007, Demonstration of a novel man-portable magnetic STAR technology for real time localization of unexploded ordnance, Proceedings of MTS/IEEE Oceans 2007, DOI 10.1109/OCEANS.2007.4449229.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H., 1985. Analysis of the Magnetic Gradient Tensor. Defence Research Establishment Pacific, Canada, Technical Memorandum, 85-13, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, W.M., Frahm, C.P., Carroll, P.J., Clark, R.H., Wellhoner, J. and M.J. Wynn, 1975, Advanced superconducting gradiometer/magnetometer arrays and a novel signal processing technique, IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-11, 701-707.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, W.M., 1995, Magnetic dipole localization using the gradient rate tensor measured by a five-axis magnetic gradiometer with known velocity, Proc. SPIE, 2496, 357-367.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, W.M., 1997, Magnetic dipole localization with a gradiometer: obtaining unique solutions, IGARSS ’97. Remote Sensing – A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE International, Vol. 4, 1483-1485.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, W.M., 1999, Detection, localization, and characterization of static magnetic-dipole sources, In C.E. Baum (Ed.), Detection and Identification of Visually Obscured Targets, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, pp. 337-374.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J.A., S.T. Keenan, D.A. Clark, K.E. Leslie, P. Sullivan, P. Fairman, C. Williams, C.P. Foley and S.D. Billings, 2010, A Superconducting Magnetic Tensor Gradiometer for Underwater UXO Detection. 21st International Geophysical Conference & Exhibition (ASEGPESA 2010); Sydney [extended abstract]. 4 pp. CD ROM.
   Google Scholar