Habitat selection in two Australasian treecreepers: what cues should they use?

References

• Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Gould, W. R., and Cherry, S. (2001). Concerns about finding effects that are actually spurious. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 311–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badyaev, A. V, Martin, T. E., and Etges, W. J. (1996). Habitat sampling and habitat selection by female Wild Turkeys: ecological correlates and reproductive consequences. Auk 113, 636–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson, I. A., and Stutchbury, B. J. (2000). Nesting success and nest-site selection by a neotropical migrant in a fragmented landscape. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 858–863. doi:10.1139/cjz-78-5-858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E., and Schmiegelow, F. K. A. (2002). Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157, 281–300. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braden, G. T., McKernan, R. L., and Powell, S. M. (1997). Association of within-territory vegetation characteristics and fitness components of California gnatcatchers. Auk 114, 601–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1998). ‘Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. G., and Shutler, D. (1999). Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology 80, 272–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutton-Brock, T. H. (Ed.) (1988). ‘Reproductive Success.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A. (1998). Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 141–177. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.141
   Google Scholar
• Cody, M. L. (Ed.) (1985). ‘Habitat Selection in Birds.’ (Academic Press: London.)
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. B., and Walters, J. R. (2002). Independent effects of woodland loss and fragmentation on Brown Treecreeper distribution. Biological Conservation 105, 1–10. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00172-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, E. D. (2004). A comparative approach to cooperative breeding: demography, helping behavior, and population genetics of Australasian treecreepers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, E. D., and Doerr, V. A. J. (2005). Dispersal range analysis: quantifying individual variation in dispersal behaviour. Oecologia 142, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, E. D., and Doerr, V. A. J. (In press). Comparative demography of treecreepers: evaluating multiple hypotheses for the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, V. A. J. (2003). Alternative dispersal tactics in Australasian treecreepers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Emlen, S. T. (1997). Predicting family dynamics in social vertebrates. In ‘Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach’. (Eds J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies.) pp. 228–253. (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Emlen, S. T., and Wrege, P. (1991). Breeding biology of white-fronted bee-eaters at Nakurus: the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. Journal of Animal Ecology 60, 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, H. A., Barrett, G. W., Saunders, D. A., and Recher, H. F. (2001). Why have birds in the woodlands of southern Australia declined? Biological Conservation 97, 71–88. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00101-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S. D., and Lucas, H. L. J. (1969). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 19, 16–36. doi:10.1007/BF01601953
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, S. T., and Crowley, G. M. (2000). ‘The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2000.’ (Environment Australia: Canberra.)
   Google Scholar
• Guisan, A., and Zimmermann, N. E. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135, 147–186. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. V, and Velleman, P. F. (1981). Building multiple regression models interactively. Biometrics 37, 391–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M., and Steele, W. K. (Eds) (2001). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 5: Tyrant-flycatchers to Chats.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R. T., Marra, P. P., and Sherry, T. W. (1996). Habitat-specific demography of breeding black-throated blue warblers (Dendroica caerulescens): implications for population dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 65, 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P. D. (1996). Habitat selection by American Redstarts along a successional gradient in northern hardwoods forest: evaluation of habitat quality. Auk 113, 875–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, F. C., and McCulloch, C. E. (1990). Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: panacea or Pandora's box? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21, 129–166.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. (2001). Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118, 557–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, C. J. (1994). ‘Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance.’ (Harper Collins: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Luck, G. W. (2002). Determining habitat quality for the cooperatively breeding Rufous Treecreeper Climacteris rufa. Austral Ecology 27, 229–237. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2002.01173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. E. (1987). Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 453–487. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.002321
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T. E. (1998). Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79, 656–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthysen, E. (1990). Behavioral and ecological correlates of territory quality in the Eurasian nuthatch (Sitta europaea). Auk 107, 86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, K. L., Stamps, J. A., Krishnan, V. V., and Willits, N. H. (1997). The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds (Troglodytes aedon). American Naturalist 150, 650–661. doi:10.1086/286087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, J. H., Bronstein, J. L., Andersen, A. N., and Holland, J. N. (2004). Ant body size predicts dispersal distance of ant-adapted seeds: implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85, 1244–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, I. (1980). The role of food in limiting bird numbers. Ardea 68, 11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noske, R. A. (1979). Co-existence of three species of treecreepers in north-eastern New South Wales. Emu 79, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Noske, R. A. (1991). A demographic comparison of cooperatively breeding and non-cooperative treecreepers (Climacteridae). Emu 91, 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. A., and Sutherland, W. J. (1986). Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Animal Behaviour 34, 1222–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penteriani, V, Balbontin, J., and Ferrer, M. (2003). Simultaneous effects of age and territory quality on fecundity in Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus. Ibis 145, E77-E82. doi:10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippi, T. E. (1993). Multiple regression: herbivory. In ‘Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments’. (Eds S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch.) pp. 183–210. (Chapman and Hall: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. M., and Dobson, A. P. (1993). Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8, 253–256. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90201-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. R. W. (1999). ‘Threatened and Declining Birds in the New South Wales Sheep-Wheat Belt: I. Diagnosis, Characteristics and Management.’ (CSIRO Wildlife and Ecology: Canberra.)
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., and Traill, B. J. (1996). Conserving woodland birds in the wheat and sheep belts of southern Australia. Conservation Statement No. 10, Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. L. (1985). Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In ‘Habitat Selection in Birds’. (Ed. M. L. Cody.) pp. 517–540. (Academic Press: London.)
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. L. (1991). Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137, S5-S28. doi:10.1086/285137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, R. J. (2004). Adaptive site selection rules and variation in group size of barn swallows: individual decisions predict population patterns. American Naturalist 164, 121–131. doi:10.1086/422198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saether, B.-E. (1990). Age-specific variation in reproductive performance of birds. Current Ornithology 7, 251–283.
   Google Scholar
• Southwood, T. R. E. (1977). Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 337–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, P. B., and Koenig, W. D. (Eds) (1990). ‘Cooperative Breeding in Birds.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, J. A. (2001). Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. In ‘Dispersal’. (Eds J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols.) pp. 230–242. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W. J. (1996). ‘From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Switzer, P. V. (2002). Territory quality, habitat selection, and competition in the amberwing dragonfly, Perithemis tenera (Say) (Odonata: Libellulidae): population patterns as a consequence of individual behavior. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 75, 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyre, A. J., Possingham, H. P., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2001). Inferring process from pattern: can territory occupancy provide information about life history parameters? Ecological Applications 11, 1722–1737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horne, B. (1983). Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 893–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. J., and Wells, J. V. (1992). Is density an indicator of breeding success? Auk 109, 706–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. A. (1985). Habitat selection in variable environments: shrub-steppe birds. In ‘Habitat Selection in Birds’. (Ed. M. L. Cody.) pp. 227–251. (Academic Press: London.)
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. A., and Rotenberry, J. T. (1981). Censusing and the evaluation of habitat occupancy. Studies in Avian Biology 6, 522–532.
   Google Scholar