Pressure-volume relation for the living human eye

References

• Gloster J. Tonometry and Tonography. London: J & A Churchill Ltd; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Silver DM, Farrell RA. Validity of pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements. Survey Ophthalmol Suppl. 1994; 38:S72–S80.
   Google Scholar
• Silver DM, Farrell RA, Yoshida A. Estimation of pul-satile ocular blood flow. J Eye (Atarashii Ganka). 1990;7:1705–1707.
   Google Scholar
• Silver DM, Farrell RA, Langham ME, O'Brien V, Schilder P. Estimation of pulsatile ocular blood flow from intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 191. 1989;67: 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenwald JS. Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1937;20:985–1024.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins ES. Ocular volume and ocular rigidity. Exp Eye Res. 1981;33:141–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prijot E. La rigidité de 1'0261 humain. Acta Ophthalmol. 1958;36:865–873.
   Google Scholar
• Prijot E, Weekers R. Contribution a l'étude de la rigidité de rceil humain normal. Ophthalmologica. 1959;138:1–
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prijot E. Contribution a l'étude de la tonométrie et de la tonographie en ophtalmologie. Docum Ophthamol. 1961;15:1–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ytteborg J. The role of intraocular blood volume in rigidity measurements on human eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1960;38:410–435.
   Google Scholar
• Ytteborg J. The effect of intraocular pressure on rigid-ity coefficient in the human eye. Acta Ophthalmol. 1960;38:548–561.
   Google Scholar
• Ytteborg J. Influence of bulbar compression on rigidity coefficient of human eyes, in vivo and enucleated. Acta Ophthalmol. 1960;38:562–577.
   Google Scholar
• Ytteborg J. Further investigations of factors influenc-ing size of rigidity coefficient. Acta Ophthalmol. 1960; 38:643–657.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenlohr JE, Langham ME, Maumenee AE. Manomet-ric studies of the pressure-volume relationship in living and enucleated eyes of individual human subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1962;46:536–548.
   Google Scholar
• Langham ME. Manometric, pressure-cup, and tono-graphic procedures in the evaluation of intraocular dynamics. The rate of recovery of the intraocular pres-sure in normal and glaucomatous eyes. In: Glaucoma Symposium Tutzing Castle 1966. Basel: Karger; 1967: 126–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ. The eyeball and its dimensions. In: Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit, 8' ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997;chap 6:217.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ. Anatomy of the human eye, orbit, and adnexa. In: Davson H, ed. The Eye, 3' ed. New York: Academic Press; 1984;vol la:chap 1:5.
   Google Scholar
• Duke-Elder S, Wybar KC. The anatomy of the visual system. In: Duke-Elder S, ed. System of Ophthalmol-ogy. St Louis: Mosby; 1961;chap 2:80–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sappey PC. Traité d 'Anatomie Descriptive, 4th ed. Paris: Lecrosnier et Babe; 1889;vol 3:701.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Schwickerath G, Gerke E. Biometric studies of the eyeball and retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984;68:29–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krogsaa B, Fledelius H, Larsen J, Lund-Andersen H. Photometric oculometry: a slit-lamp technique for de-termination of intraocular distances. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1985;222:212–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downey DB, Nicolle DA, Levin MF, Fenster A. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the eye. Eye. 1996;10:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano A, Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Reinstein DZ, Rondeau MJ, Ursea R, Daly SM, Lloyd HO. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:300–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher Y, Hanutsaha P, Tong S, Fenster A, Mazarin G, Mandava N. Three-dimensional ophthalmic contact B-scan ultrasonography of the posterior segment. Retina. 1998;18:251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southall JPC. Introduction to Physiological Optics. London: Oxford University Press; 1937:134–135.
   Google Scholar
• McBrien NA, Adams DW. A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:321–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin BJ, Karlin DB. Axial length measurements and fundus changes of the myopic eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;71:42–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang NC, Schmid KL, Carney LG. Hyperopia is pre-dominantly axial in nature. Current Eye Res. 1998;17: 380–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RS, Grosvenor T. Structural model for emmetropic and myopic eyes. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 1993;13:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossniklaus HE, Green WR. Pathologic findings in pathologic myopia. Retina. 1992;12:127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz M. The human eye as an optical system. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA, eds. Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997;chap 33:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels DD. Visual Optics and Refraction, a Clinical Approach. St Louis: Mosby; 1985:175.
   Google Scholar
• Fledelius H. Ultrasound oculometry and exophthal-mometry in high myopia with reference to the occur-rence of retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. 1971; 49:707–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grignolo A, Cambiaggi A, Rivara A. The axial length of the eye of normal subjects and of patients with reti-nal detachment. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1969;8:118–124.
   Google Scholar