Visual function thresholds in children

Reference

• France TD, France LW. Low contrast visual acuity cards in pediatric ophthalmology. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:158–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. Low contrast letter charts and sinewave grat-ing tests in ophthalmological and neurological disorders. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2:235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Regan D. Low contrast visual acuity test for pediatric use. Can J Ophthalmol. 1988;23:224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Reese D, Brown B. Low con-trast letter acuity in childhood amblyopia. Clin Vision Sci. 1990;5:243–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kothe AC, Regan D. Crowding depends on contrast. Optom Vision Sci. 1990;67:283–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods RL, Woods JM. The role of contrast sensitivityand contrast letter charts in clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom. 1995;78:43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Gray LS, McGraw PV, Winn B. Contour Interaction for High and Low Contrast Optotypes in Normal and Amblyopic Observers. Ophthal Physiol Opts. 1999;19:253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL. Simplifying contrast sensitivity testing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982;59:12.
   Google Scholar
• Regan D, Neima D. Low contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:1192–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D, Neima D. Low contrast letter charts in early diabetic retinopathy, ocular hypertension, glaucoma and Parkinson's disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984;68:885–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flom MC, Weymouth FW, Kahneman D. Visual reso-lution and contour interaction. J Opt Soc Am A. 1963; 53:1026–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Anker S, Evans C, Hall R, Pimm-Smith E. Visual acuity testing of young children with the Cam-bridge Crowding Cards at 3 m and 6 m. Acta Ophthalmo-logica. 1988;66: 505–508.
   Google Scholar
• Knowler E, Martins AJ. Eye movements of pre-school children. Science. 1982;215:997–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothe AC, Regan D. The component of gaze selection/ control in the development of visual acuity in children. Optom Vision Sci. 1990;67:770–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D, Giaschi DE, Kraft SP, Kothe AC. Method for identifying amblyopes whose reduced line acuity is caused by defective selection and/or control of gaze. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 1992;12:425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer G, McKee SP. Visual acuity in the presence of retinal image motion. J Opt Soc Am A. 1975;52:847–850.
   Google Scholar
• De Valois RL, De Valois KK. Optics. In Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer G, McKee SP. Integration regions for vi-sual hyperacuity. Vision Res. 1977;17:89–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer G. Scaling of visual acuity measurements. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:327–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKee SP, Levi DM. Dichoptic hyperacuity: The pre-cision of nonius alignment. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;1:620–627.
   Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Klein SA. Vernier acuity, crowding and am-blyopia. Vision Res.1985;25: 979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Klein SA, Aitsebaomo AP. Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Res. 1985; 25:963–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw PV, Winn B. Glasgow acuity cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1993;13:400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaschi ED, Regan D, Kraft SP, Kothe AC. Crowding and contrast in amblyopia. Optom Vision Sci. 1993;70: 192–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch JM, Williams RA. Development of clinical tests of vision: Initial data on two hyperacuity paradigms. Percept Psychophys. 1983 ;33 :314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshminarayanan V, Aziz S, Enoch JM. Variation of hyperacuity gap function with age. Optom Vision Sci. 1992;69:423–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer G. Visual Hyperacuity. In Progress in Sen-sory Physiology. New York: Springler-Verlag, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw PV, Winn B, Whitaker D, McFadzean R. Po-sitional acuity in amblyopia: does a perceptual conse-quence of neural recruitment exist? Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1998;18:423-429.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch T, Taylor HR. Clini-cal grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:422–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. Ananalysis of varience test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52:591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assess-ing agreement between two methods of clinical measure-ment. The Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmers, AJ, Gray, LS, McGraw PV and Winn, B. Func-tional loss in amblyopia and the effect of occlusion therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40;2859–2871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw PV. Studies of human macular function: de-velopmental anomalies. PhD Thesis. Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Spowart K. Screening for Am-blyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:465–469.
   Google Scholar
• Fern KB, Manny RE. Visual Acuity of the Preschool Child: A Review. Am J Optom Phys Opt. 1986;63:319–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salt AT, Sonksen PM, Wade A, Jayatunga R. The Matu-ration of Linear Acuity and Compliance with the Sonksen-Silver Acuity System in Young Children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995;37:505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern KB, Manny RE, Davis JR, Gibson RR. Contour interaction in the pre-school child. Am J Optom Phys Opt. 1986;63:313–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown B, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal popula-tion. Optom Vision Sci. 1989;66:467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot DB, Bullimore MA. Assessing the reliability, dis-criminative ability and validity of disabilty glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:108–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Braddick 0, Moar K. Development of con-trast sensitivity over the first 3 months of life. Vision Res. 1977;17: 1037–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hamer RD. High visual contrast sensitivity in the human infant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:44–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Winn B. The effect of abnormal fixational eye movements upon visual acuity in congential nystagmus. Curr Eye Res. 1999;18:194–202.
   Google Scholar
• Gwiazda J. Development of grating acuity and Vernier acuity in the detection of amblyopia in human infants. In Lenk-Schafer M, ed. Orthoptic Horizons: Transac-tions of the Sixth International Orthoptic Congress. London: British Orthoptic Society, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Augliere R. Preferential look-ing acuity is temporally tuned. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:5.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham T, Watkins R. The effect of stimulus con-trast and luminance on oscillatory movement displace-ment thresholds. Perception. 1990;19:391.
   Google Scholar
• Van Essen DC, Gallant JL. Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system. Neuron. 1994;13:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Smith EL III, Duncan GC, Crawford MU, Von Noorden GK. Multiple sensitive periods in the de-velopment of the primate visual system. Science. 1987;232:235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar