Neural pathways subserving negative lens-induced emmetropization in chicks – Insights from selective lesions of the optic nerve and ciliary nerve

References

• Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD et al. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res. 1988;28:639–657.
   Google Scholar
• Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1992; 12:448–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res. 1995;35:1175–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott ML, Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J et al. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegwart JT, Norton TT. Refractive and ocular changes in tree shrews raised with plus or minus lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL, 3rd., Hung LF, Harwerth RS. Effects of opticallyinduced blur on the refractive status of young monkeys. Vision Res. 1994;34:293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EL, 3rd. Hung LF. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 1999;39:1415–1435.
   Google Scholar
• Graham B, Judge SJ. The effect of spectacle wear in infancy on eye growth and refractive error in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vision Res. 1999;39:189–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF. Myopization and the effects of optic nerve section revisited - A study in chick. In: Myopia 2000. Proceedings of the VIII International Conference on Myopia. 2000. Boston, USA: Conference on Myopia Inc; 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Troilo D, Gottlieb MD, Wallman J. Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. Curr Eye Res. 1987;6:993–999.
   Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Pettigrew J. Experimental myopia and anom-alous eye growth patterns unaffected by optic nerve section in chickens: Evidence for local control of eye growth. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;3:99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Wallman J, Adams II. Developmental aspects of experi-mental myopia in chicks: Susceptibility, recovery and rela-tion to emmetropization. Vision Res. 1987;27:1139–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troilo D, Wallman J. The regulation of eye growth and refractive state: An experimental study of emmetropization. Vision Res. 1991;31:1237–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF. Retinal control of eye growth and refractive error in the chick. PhD thesis. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Queensland: Brisbane, Australia; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Schmid KL. Optical correction of form deprivation myopia inhibits refractive recovery in chick eyes with intact or sectioned optic nerves. Vision Res. 2000;40:3273–3282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nau AC, Wildsoet CF, Troilo D. Hyperopic defocus from spectacle lenses alters the pattern of accommodation behavior in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40: S846.
   Google Scholar
• Troilo D, Boisvert N, Nau A. How is accommodation related to the development of refractive state? Evidence from experimental studies using animal models. In: Myopia 2000. Proceedings of the VIII International Conference on Myopia. 2000. Boston, USA: Conference on Myopia Inc; 254–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann M, Schaeffel F, Hagel G et al. Constant light affects retinal dopamine levels and blocks deprivation myopia but not lens-induced refractive errors in chickens. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Hagel G, Hartmann M et al. 6-Hydroxy dopamine does not affect lens-induced refractive errors but suppresses deprivation myopia. Vision Res. 1994;34: 143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee CS, Marzani D, Wallman J. Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42 :575–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikado T, Kawasaki Y, Suzuki A et al. Retinal function with lens-induced myopia compared with form-deprivation myopia in chicks. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997;235:320–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer M, Feldkaemper M, Schaeffel F. Visually induced changes in components of the retinoic acid system in fundal layers of the chick. Exp Eye Res. 2000;70:97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Yew KL, Wildsoet CF. The usual effects of high-power neg-ative lenses and diffusers show differential susceptibility to disruption to the diurnal light cycle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 :ARVO abstract#1979.
   Google Scholar
• Schwahn HN, Schaeffel E Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxy dopamine treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35: 3516–3524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Troilo D, Wallman J et al. Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus. Vis Neurosci. 1990;4:177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Howland HC, Falconer S et al. Chromatic aberration and accommodation: Their role in emmetropiza-tion in the chick. Vision Res. 1993;33:1593–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks. Vision Res. 1996;36:1023–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner A, Karten HJ, Gamlin PDR et al. Parasympathetic ocular control: Functional subdivisions and circuitry of the avian nucleus of Edinger-Westphal. Trends Neurosci. 1983;6:140–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Howland HC, Farkas L. Natural accommoda-tion in the growing chicken. Vision Res. 1986;26:1977–1993.
   Google Scholar
• Troilo D, Wallman J. Changes in corneal curvature during accommodation in chicks. Vision Res. 1987 ;27 :241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troilo D, Francis E, Yi G. The temporal characteristics of eye growth control mechanisms differ following optic nerve section. In: Vision Science & Its Applications. Sante Fe: Optical Society of America; 1997,134–137.
   Google Scholar
• Choh V, Wildsoet CF. Time course of axial changes to ocular components of optic nerve sectioned chick eyes. In: Myopia: Strategies for the 21st Century 9th International Conference on Myopia. 2002. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University, p. 35.
   Google Scholar
• Nickla DL, Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66:163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Obstfeld H. Astigmatism. In: Optics in Vision. Boston: Butterworths; 1978,46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lin T, Zhu X, Capehart C et al. The ciliary ganglion and vitreous cavity shape. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Howland H. Modulation of constant light effects on the eye by ciliary ganglionectomy and optic nerve section. Vision Res. 2000;40:2249–2256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Wallman J. Is the rate of lens compensation proportional to the degree of defocus? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:5461.
   Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Pettigrew JD. Kainic acid-induced eye enlargement in chickens: Differential effects on anterior and posterior segments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich D, Sattayasai J, Zappia J et al. Effects of selective neurotoxins on eye growth in the young chick. In: Bock GR, Widdows K, eds. Myopia and the Control of Eye Growth. Chichester: Wiley; 1990,63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Stone RA, Lin T, Desai D et al. Photoperiod, early post-natal eye growth, and visual deprivation. Vision Res. 1995;35:1195–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diether S, Schaeffel F. Local changes in eye growth induced by imposed local refractive error despite active accommodation. Vision Res. 1997;37:659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Howland HC. Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken. Vision Res. 1991;31:717–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid GF, Papastergiou GI, Lin T et al. Autonomic denervations influence ocular dimensions and intraocular pressure in chicks. Exp Eye Res. 1999;68:573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich D. Regional specialization of the chick retina as revealed by the size and density of neurons in the ganglion cell layer. J Comp Neurol. 1981;195:643–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles FA. Centrifugal control of the avian retina. I. Recep-tive field properties of retinal ganglion cells. Brain Res. 1972;48:65–92.
   Google Scholar
• Miles FA. Centrifugal control of the avian retina. II. Recep-tive field properties of cells in the isthmo-optic nucleus. Brain Res. 1972;48:93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Miles FA. Centrifugal control of the avian retina. III. Effects of electrical stimulation of the isthmo-optic tract on the receptive field properties of retinal ganglion cells. Brain Res. 1972;48:115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Miles FA. Centrifugal control of the avian retina. W Effects of reversible cold block of the isthmo-optic tract on the receptive field properties of cells in the retina and isthmo-optic nucleus. Brain Res. 1972;48:131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Howland HC. A true neuronal consensual pupillary reflex in chicks. Vision Res. 1999;39:897–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, McBrien NA, Clark IQ. Atropine inhibition of lens-induced effects in chicks: Evidence for similar mechanisms underlying form deprivation and lens-induced myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35: 2068.
   Google Scholar
• Stone RA, Lin RL, Laties AM. Muscarinic antagonist effects on experimental chick myopia. Exp Eye Res. 1991; 52:755–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer AJ, Miethke P, Morgan IG et al. Cholinergic amacrine cells are not required for the progression and atropine-mediated suppression of form-deprivation myopia. Brain Res. 1998;794:48–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Hartmann M, Hagel G et al. Studies on the role of the retinal dopamine/melatonin system in experimental refractive errors in chickens. Vision Res. 1995;35:1247–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faktorovich EG, Steinberg RH, Yasumura D et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor and local injury protect photoreceptors from light damage in the rat. J Neurosci. 1992;12:3554–3567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer J, Wallman J. Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. Vision Res. 2002 ;42 :2651–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean RC, Wallman J. Severe astigmatic blur does not interfere with spectacle lens compensation. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:449–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Feldkaemper MP, Winawer JA et al. What ocular components underlie the inhibition of myopia or hyperopia by glucagon or by its antagonist? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 ;42(ARVO Abstracts): S57.
   Google Scholar