Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components

References

• Sharma A, Khanna R, Reiter G. A thin film analog of the corneal mucus layer of the tear film: An enigmatic long range non-classical DLVO interaction in the breakup of polymer films. Coll Surf B: Biointer.1999;14:223–235.
   Google Scholar
• Dilly PN. Structure and function of the tear film. In: Sullivan D, ed., Lacrimal Gland,Tear Film,and Dry Eye Syndromes.New York: Plenum Press; 1994:239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson AW, Gast AP. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces.New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc; 6th ed., 1997:Chapter 10.
   Google Scholar
• Miller C, Neogi P. Interfacial Phenomena: Equilibrium and Dynamic Effects.Surfactant Science Series. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985:54–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lam CNC, Wu R, Li D, Hair MIL, Neumann AW. Study of the advancing and receding contact angles: Liquid sorption as a cause of contact angle hysteresis. Adv Coll Inter Sci.2002;96:169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Refojo MF. Wettability of hydrogels I. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Biomed Mater Res.1975;9:315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MC, Graham AD, Polse KA, Mandell RB, McNamara NA. Measurement of post-lens tear thickness. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci.1999;40(12):2833–2839.
   Google Scholar
• Wong H, Fatt I, Radke CJ. Deposition and thinning of the human tear film. J Coll Inter Sci.1996;184:44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Quére, D. On the minimal velocity of forced wetting in partial wetting. C R Acad Sci Paris.1991 ;313(2):313–318.
   Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Lemp M. The preocular tear film and dry eye syndrome. International Ophthalmology Clinics Series.Boston: Little, Brown & Co;1973:Vol. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Fatt I. Observations of tear film break up on model eyes. CLAO J.1991;17:267–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivowetta-bility of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res.2001; 23(1):51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarver M, Bowman L, Bauman E, DiMartino R, Lau D, Umeda W. Wettability of some gas-permeable hard contact lenses. Intern Contact Lens Clin.1984 ;11(8):479–487.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Herskowitz R. Is there more than one angle to the wetting characteristics of contact lenses? Contact Lens Spectrum.1992;7(10):26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cunanan CM, Ghazizadeh M, Buchen SY, Knight PM. Contact-angle analysis of intraocular lenses. J Catar Refrac Surg.1998;24:341–351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiffany J. Measurement of wettability of the corneal epithe-1Mm II: Contact angle method. Acta Ophthalmol.1990; 68:182–187.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, SL, Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH et al.A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomat.2001 ;22(24):3261–3272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobe GL, Valint PL, Ammon DM. Surface chemical structure for soft contact lenses as a function of polymer processing. J Biomed Mater Res.1996;32:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Refojo MF. Water wettability of proteins adsorbed at the hydrogel-water interface. In: Andrade JD, ed., Hydro-gels for Medical ands Related Applications.ACS Sympo-sium Series 31, Chapter 20,1976:267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Refojo MF, Holly F. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: A possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Lens J.1977;3:23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Lemp M. Wettability and wetting of corneal epithelium. Exp Eye Res.1971;11:239–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valint, PJ, Ammon DM Jr, Grobe GL III, McGee JA. In-situsurface modification of contact lens polymers, In: Ratner BD, Caster DG, eds. Surface Modification of Polymeric Biomaterials.New York: Plenum Press; 1997: 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lai Y-C, Friends GD. Surface wettability enhancement of silicone hydrogel lenses by processing with polar plastic molds. J Biomed Mat Res.1997;35(3):349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Merill EW. Poly(ethylene glycol) chemistry: Biotechnical and biomedical applications. In: Harris JM, ed. Poly(ethyl-ene glycol) Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Appli-cations.New York: Plenum Press; 1992:199–219.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur SL, McLean K, St. John HAW, Griesser HJ. XPS and surface-MALDI-MS characterisation of worn HEMA-based contact lenses. Biomat.2001;22:3295–3304.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbleton KA. The physical and clinical characteristics of silicone hydrogel lenses: How they work? Silicone Hydro-gels.org.2002; Available at URL:http://www.siliconehy-drogels.orgieditorials/previous_editorials_kathryn.asp
   Google Scholar
• Winterton L. Personal Communication. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials - How do they work? In: Sweeney D, ed., Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses.Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Senchyna M. Protein and lipid deposition of sili-cone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Silicone Hydrogels org.2002; Available at URL:http://www.siliconehydro-gels.orgieditorials/previous_editorial jones_senchyna.asp
   Google Scholar
• Weikart CM, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda HK. Eval-uation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electro-chemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res.2001;54:597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L. MS Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• LOpez-Alemany A, Compaii V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of PurevisionTM versus Focus® Night & Day and conven-tional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater).2002;63:319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris CA, Holden BA, Papas E, Griesser HJ, Bolis S, Anderton P, Carney F. The ocular surface, the tear film, and the wettability of contact lens. In: Sullivan D, Dartt D, Meneray M, eds. Lacrimal Gland,Tear Film,and Dry Eye Syndromes 2.New York: Plenum Press; 1998:717–722.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Manthorpe R, Wollmer P. Surface activity of tear fluid in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.1998;76:438–441.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffany JM, Prandit JC, Bron AJ. Soluble mucin and the physical properties of tears. In: Sullivan D, Dartt D, Meneray M, eds. Lacrimal Gland,Tear Film,and Dry Eye Syndromes 2.New York: Plenum Press; 1998:229–234.
   Google Scholar
• Tettamanti G, Pigman W. Purification and characterization of bovine and ovine submaxillary mucins. Arch Biochem. Biophys.1968;124(1):41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L. Biomimetic surfaces of biomaterials using mucin-type glycoproteins. Trends Glycosci Glycotech.2000; 12(66):229–239.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett Q, Garrett RL, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.1998;40(5):897–903.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller RJ, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci.1990;31:1119–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Gachon AM, Richard J, Dastugue B. Human tears: Normal protein pattern and individual protein determinations in adults. Curr Eye Res.1982 ;2(5): 301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Stuchell RN, Farris RL, Mandel ID. Methods of studying proteins in the tear fluid. In: Holly FJ, ed. The PreocularTear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbock, TX: Dry Eye Institute; 1986:462–470.
   Google Scholar
• Selsted ME, Marinez RI Isolation and purification of bac-tericides from human tears. Exp Eye Res.1982;34(3): 305–318.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiszig SMJ, Zuide T, Ramphal R, Pier GB. Modulation of pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence to the corneal surface by mucus. Amer Soc Microbiol.1994;62(5):1799–1804.
   Google Scholar
• Creeth JM, Bridge JL, Horton JR. An interaction between lysozyme and mucus glycoproteins: Implications for density-gradient separations. Biochem J.1979 ;181(3): 717–724.
   Google Scholar
• Veronese F. Peptide and protein PEGylation: A review of problems and solutions. Biomat.2001;22:405–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MJ, Bentley MD, Harris JM. Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation. Adv Drug Delivery Rev.2002;54(4):459–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin WJ, Piccolo M, Toubiana HA. Wettability: A blink by blink account. Inter Contact Lens Clin.1984;11:492–496.
   Google Scholar
• Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface: Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.1987; 28:842–849.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy CD. Initial in vivotear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Opt Vis Sci.1990;67(7):504–511.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnert J, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.1988;29(3):362–373.
   Google Scholar
• Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replace-ment frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Opt Vision Sci.1998;75(9):697–705.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson TM, Lo J. Protein adsorp-tion on hydrogels 2: Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact-lens surfaces. Biomat.1985;6(5):338–345.
   Google Scholar
• Refojo MF, Leong FL. Microscopic determination of the penetration of protein and polysaccharides into poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and similar hydrogels. J Poly Sci C-Poly Symp.1979;66:227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Senchyna M, Louie D, Schickler J. A comparative evaluation of lysozyme and lipid deposition on etafilcon, balafilcon, and lotrafilcon contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2001;42(4) #3816 Suppl. S.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan NA, Coles M-L. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Inter Contact Lens Clin.2000;27:75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Wedler FC, Illman BL, Horensky DS, Mowrey-McKee M. Analysis of protein and mucin components deposited on hydrophiliccontact lenses. Clin Exp Optom.1987;90(2): 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hart DE, Plociniak MP, Grimes GW. Defining the physio-logically normal coating and pathological deposit: An analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J.1998;24(2):85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tighe B, Franklin V. Lens deposition and spoilation. In: Larke JR, ed. The Eye in Contact Lens Wear.2nd edition, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997;Chapter 4.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward JT, Ullman A, Schwartz DK. Self-assembled monolayer growth of octadecylphosphonic acid on mica. Langmuir.1996;12(15):3626–3629.
   Google Scholar